Jump to content


Changes to Vehicles With Preferential Matchmaking + Notes on Trade-in


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
1086 replies to this topic

nukem519 #1081 Posted Jul 26 2018 - 12:56

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 30629 battles
  • 41
  • [THUD] THUD
  • Member since:
    10-07-2013

It is about time they finally responded to this huge topic of Preferential MM. (https://worldoftanks.com/en/news/announcements/preferential-matchmaking-0718/) I guess with the big uproar from a lot of players from all over. They decided not to go through with their plans for now. Thank Goodness:teethhappy: I am very HAPPY about this news!!!

 

GL & HF:)



Cognitive_Dissonance #1082 Posted Jul 26 2018 - 13:17

    Major

  • Players
  • 39088 battles
  • 6,141
  • [ANASS] ANASS
  • Member since:
    01-31-2013

Annnnnnd ^^^^^^ I just read the article and most of these "revelations" through WG testing were suggested, have been suggested, and proposed by the player base for at least 3 years.

 

However, I guess it is good that WG did listen to the blow back, and are admitting (though with a significant delay) there is some merit to addressing 3/5/7, and the vehicles themselves to address the problems.

 

Still, the one glaring thing they blamed on pref MM was that it wrecked 3/5/7, and now they are literally going back on that entire premise. I am wondering if their marketing department is aware of the collective player base eye roll at this new suddenly realized dynamic that WG is just now discovering?


Edited by Cognitive_Dissonance, Jul 26 2018 - 13:18.


Kehox #1083 Posted Jul 26 2018 - 14:51

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 13525 battles
  • 363
  • Member since:
    01-23-2015
i guess the change on the WZ-111 ... will be applied on the Alpine Tiger ??....... at the same time... ???? it the same tank ... 

AmyAdams #1084 Posted Jul 26 2018 - 15:09

    Private

  • Players
  • 19487 battles
  • 5
  • [VOID] VOID
  • Member since:
    02-22-2013
I would like a cash refund to my T-34-3, FCM 50 t, KV-5, IS-6, JgTig.8,8 cm, T26E4 SuperPershing, M6A2E1, and all my tier 7,6 and 5 pref tanks too. Adds up to about $400-500 dollars total of all the preferential tanks I own that you owe me. Thank you Wargaming, have a nice day.

Blastyourasst #1085 Posted Jul 26 2018 - 15:26

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 18837 battles
  • 13
  • [FART-] FART-
  • Member since:
    06-12-2016

In this article and previous ones, the developers keep referring to single tier battles as being a problem.  WHY??? if you polled everyone in the game (not just on forums as they are populated by only a tiny portion of players) I am willing to bet my account that 60-70% of actual players would prefer more single tier battles.

 


 

Please put an in-game poll for everyone and see what the results are!  People will wait 1-2 mins for a match if they know they will not be cannon fodder. 


 

Also, can the Super Pershing please hit its speed limit of 40 km/hr on anything other than a cliff dive?????



flyinrat #1086 Posted Jul 26 2018 - 15:39

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 10918 battles
  • 2
  • [M_N] M_N
  • Member since:
    09-09-2012
I play the Rudy and Is3 and also have tier 9 an 8 that I don't play cause I am never higher than middle of list these tanks are horrible in mm and are always on bottom. Paid good money for rudy an now its the worst tank for mm after seeing that I will never spend a dime for a tank again.My stats isn't that good because of poor mm and after ten games I only win three so I just play lower tiers so I don't loose that much coin.

CabbageMechanic #1087 Posted Jul 26 2018 - 15:54

    Senior Community Manager

  • Administrator
  • 8248 battles
  • 395
  • [WGA] WGA
  • Member since:
    09-19-2010
Hey folks, update on this topic here.

 




3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users