Jump to content


* - - - - 1 votes

[CT] Update 1.0.2 Test 2

1.0.2 feedback

  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

Gnomon #1 Posted May 31 2018 - 17:35

    Community Coordinator

  • Administrator
  • 782 battles
  • 307
  • [WGA] WGA
  • Member since:
    11-23-2015

Hey, everyone! 

 

The second Common Test for Update 1.0.2 is now live! 

 

Our portal article lists all changes and testing times: Update 1.0.2: Common Test 2 is Here! 

 

Also, please be aware that the test server will be restarted regularly, according to the following schedule:

 

  • First Periphery: 20:00 PT | 22:00 CT | 23:00 ET every day. Average duration will be around 25 minutes.
  • Second Periphery:  21:00 PT | 23:00 CT | 00:00 ET every day. Average duration will be around 25 minutes.
  • Central Database:  01:00 PT | 03:00 CT | 04:00 ET every day. Average duration will be around 2 minutes.

 

In this test, we fixed several issues and also included some changes to a few tanks. 

 

Be sure to check out what has been changed:

 

List of Changes

 

 

As always, please provide your feedback, comments, and suggestions below.

 

Thanks for your time, and best of luck on the battlefield! 



NiteDog #2 Posted May 31 2018 - 17:46

    Major

  • Players
  • 27307 battles
  • 6,397
  • [HSOLO] HSOLO
  • Member since:
    08-09-2011

The nerf to the OBJ 277 is unbearable.

Changed the arrangement of the internal modules (ammo rack and fuel tanks)



Lesser_Spotted_Panzer #3 Posted May 31 2018 - 18:02

    Major

  • Players
  • 75288 battles
  • 2,985
  • Member since:
    02-11-2012
K-91 really needed that buff...so props on that one.

64sherman #4 Posted May 31 2018 - 18:04

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 25948 battles
  • 439
  • [MOZZY] MOZZY
  • Member since:
    03-21-2013

The Object 277 is fine.  The map changes are okay I guess but the water on the south crossing on malinovka is still way to deep.  Teammates will rush across, fall in and drown because they cant make it up the embankment.  

Please just leave the Object 430 II exactly like it is now on the live server.  You don't have to make every single tank in the line play exactly the same.  A LOT of players would prefer some variety in game-play.  Why have a tier 10 object 416 when you can play the 416 at tier 8.  Each tank should have it's own personality, making them all clones is just plain wrong.  Nobody asked for this change.  I don't care what you do with the K-91, it will never enter my garage because the tank is modeled incorrectly.  It's supposed to have a round hull, and actually have armor.  It should play like the 430 II does now, not as some sort of super slow armorless sniper with 4 degrees of gun depression.  



T_Bagins #5 Posted May 31 2018 - 18:15

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 9428 battles
  • 20
  • [TEBAG] TEBAG
  • Member since:
    03-25-2015
I never thought the day would come where I would be selling my beloved 430 V2. I will very much so miss the best face hugging tank I have played so far. I have no interest in playing my mediums as snipers, nope no thank you! I guess I will be getting the 140 to go along with my 430u.  Goodbye old friend Obj 430 ver2.  You will be missed. 

dominator_98 #6 Posted May 31 2018 - 18:35

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 19954 battles
  • 3,500
  • [NUFFS] NUFFS
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

RIP Obj 432 fans. On the bright side, the 416 fans have a whole line now. 

 

View PostNiteDog, on May 31 2018 - 10:46, said:

The nerf to the OBJ 277 is unbearable.

Changed the arrangement of the internal modules (ammo rack and fuel tanks)

Honestly I was expecting something a lot better from this tank. The 5A is still better overall from what I’ve seen, it looks like this tank will only outdo the 113 and IS-7.



bigman33 #7 Posted May 31 2018 - 18:55

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 27232 battles
  • 14
  • [FATE] FATE
  • Member since:
    03-21-2011
Seriously WG?!?!? Stop nerfing crapmy god. Ive been playing since closed and all you guys do is think for your company not the players your nerf crap thats uneeded and buff crapwhen it isnt either then you remove maps more than you add. And on top of it you still have all these crapass map you keep in rotation and remove the one that were actually enjoyable. That whole kv5 crap is [edited]and you know it what you should do if players want to trade the kv5 give them a teir 8 prem credit which allows players who own the kv5 to choose another teir 8 prem of there choice simple and easy theres no reason you should charge players it also shouldnt be allowed since your altering a tank for worse not better you throw the kv5 into a teir 10 match it wont mean crap your nerfing a tank that a player bought. the version 2 is perfect where its at so stop thinking its fine to nerf it its not op and players to run crazy with it leave it be ok stop pulling [edited]punches to your players bite the bullet and stop trying to grab money from players because you choose to [edited]around with a tank you people seriously need to ask the community about these things more and listen to us not a group of programers who think they know what we the community wants only good youve done recently in the past years is frontlines

TwixOps #8 Posted May 31 2018 - 19:20

    Major

  • Players
  • 47382 battles
  • 4,381
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

View Postbigman33, on May 31 2018 - 13:55, said:

Seriously WG?!?!? Stop nerfing crapmy god. Ive been playing since closed and all you guys do is think for your company not the players your nerf crap thats uneeded and buff crapwhen it isnt either then you remove maps more than you add. And on top of it you still have all these crapass map you keep in rotation and remove the one that were actually enjoyable. That whole kv5 crap is [edited]and you know it what you should do if players want to trade the kv5 give them a teir 8 prem credit which allows players who own the kv5 to choose another teir 8 prem of there choice simple and easy theres no reason you should charge players it also shouldnt be allowed since your altering a tank for worse not better you throw the kv5 into a teir 10 match it wont mean crap your nerfing a tank that a player bought. the version 2 is perfect where its at so stop thinking its fine to nerf it its not op and players to run crazy with it leave it be ok stop pulling [edited]punches to your players bite the bullet and stop trying to grab money from players because you choose to [edited]around with a tank you people seriously need to ask the community about these things more and listen to us not a group of programers who think they know what we the community wants only good youve done recently in the past years is frontlines

 

Umm... those are all buffs, did you even read the post?

 



T_Bagins #9 Posted May 31 2018 - 19:49

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 9428 battles
  • 20
  • [TEBAG] TEBAG
  • Member since:
    03-25-2015

View PostTwixOps, on May 31 2018 - 19:20, said:

 

Umm... those are all buffs, did you even read the post?

 

 

  • Decreased hull and turret armor
  • Changed the turret durability from 1,600 to 1,500 HP
  • Changed the reinforced turret durability from 1,700 to 1,600 HP

 

I was just about to rip you for that comment and say you have never played the tank, but you have, and alot. Its a face hugging tank as it is and does it well. They are changing the way the tank plays, completely.  You can't be that excited to have a back line medium right?? 



bigman33 #10 Posted May 31 2018 - 19:56

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 27232 battles
  • 14
  • [FATE] FATE
  • Member since:
    03-21-2011

View PostT_Bagins, on May 31 2018 - 10:49, said:

 

  • Decreased hull and turret armor
  • Changed the turret durability from 1,600 to 1,500 HP
  • Changed the reinforced turret durability from 1,700 to 1,600 HP

 

I was just about to rip you for that comment and say you have never played the tank, but you have, and alot. Its a face hugging tank as it is and does it well. They are changing the way the tank plays, completely.  You can't be that excited to have a back line medium right?? 

Its a great tank now and should be left that way



lenticular #11 Posted May 31 2018 - 21:53

    Captain

  • Players
  • 38538 battles
  • 1,337
  • [O-VER] O-VER
  • Member since:
    06-08-2012

Block Quote

some sort of super slow armorless sniper

 

Well, the buff to engine horsepower (850hp, up from 500hp) totally changes that. Power/wt ratio now outstrips all other Soviet Tier X mediums. Feels like it'll be much more like the Obj 416. Now I don't regretting buying the Obj 430 II and re-slogging through the grind on that thing. (Can't believe Ill have ground out 750,00+ xp in it)



godofdun #12 Posted May 31 2018 - 22:04

    Major

  • Players
  • 14471 battles
  • 5,310
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    07-09-2011
Huh, actually really liking the look of these changes, I don't get to say that often.

NiteDog #13 Posted May 31 2018 - 22:20

    Major

  • Players
  • 27307 battles
  • 6,397
  • [HSOLO] HSOLO
  • Member since:
    08-09-2011

View Postdominator_98, on May 31 2018 - 09:35, said:

RIP Obj 432 fans. On the bright side, the 416 fans have a whole line now. 

 

Honestly I was expecting something a lot better from this tank. The 5A is still better overall from what I’ve seen, it looks like this tank will only outdo the 113 and IS-7.

 

I haven't played the 5A, so I can't compare tanks. I did play 1 game in the OBJ 277 and I like it. It seems like a T10 on steroids. The gun depression is horrid.

Edited by NiteDog, May 31 2018 - 22:25.


SU_Whisperer #14 Posted Jun 01 2018 - 04:47

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 5730 battles
  • 61
  • Member since:
    04-06-2015

View Post64sherman, on May 31 2018 - 12:04, said:

The Object 277 is fine.  The map changes are okay I guess but the water on the south crossing on malinovka is still way to deep.  Teammates will rush across, fall in and drown because they cant make it up the embankment.  

Please just leave the Object 430 II exactly like it is now on the live server.  You don't have to make every single tank in the line play exactly the same.  A LOT of players would prefer some variety in game-play.  Why have a tier 10 object 416 when you can play the 416 at tier 8.  Each tank should have it's own personality, making them all clones is just plain wrong.  Nobody asked for this change.  I don't care what you do with the K-91, it will never enter my garage because the tank is modeled incorrectly.  It's supposed to have a round hull, and actually have armor.  It should play like the 430 II does now, not as some sort of super slow armorless sniper with 4 degrees of gun depression.  

 

View PostT_Bagins, on May 31 2018 - 12:15, said:

I never thought the day would come where I would be selling my beloved 430 V2. I will very much so miss the best face hugging tank I have played so far. I have no interest in playing my mediums as snipers, nope no thank you! I guess I will be getting the 140 to go along with my 430u.  Goodbye old friend Obj 430 ver2.  You will be missed. 

 

Same here, the new Obj. 430 II is no longer fun to play since it's no longer the tank it used to be, feels very bad to say that, but I will sell mine too, even if it used to be my favorite, by far... I would have liked the K-91-2 though, feels like a unique tank like the entirety of the line, and also much more like Obj. 430 II which plays like the A-44, a well armoured rear-mounted assault tank that is small and agile (for the armor). The loss of my go-to tank for fun is unbearable.

SU_Whisperer #15 Posted Jun 01 2018 - 04:59

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 5730 battles
  • 61
  • Member since:
    04-06-2015

View Postdominator_98, on May 31 2018 - 12:35, said:

RIP Obj 432 fans. On the bright side, the 416 fans have a whole line now. 

 

Honestly I was expecting something a lot better from this tank. The 5A is still better overall from what I’ve seen, it looks like this tank will only outdo the 113 and IS-7.

 

I liked the Obj. 416, but not as much as the 430 II, 416 is unique and awkward to play, which I like, but the lack of armor cause it to camp way too much and you can't go support in the second line because you don't have gun depression. The problem ? They destroy my favorite tank in the process of creating a fake tank that never even existed, not even on blueprints... OK, the K-91-1 and K-91-2 did exist, but the in-game K-91 never actually existed. The joke is that WoT Blitz has their K-91 and it's far from being as bad as the new tier 10 fake tank. The WoT Blitz's K-91 is a tier 9 HT that is also known as K-91-1 in IRL. Makes no sense :angry:

Mikosah #16 Posted Jun 01 2018 - 16:01

    Major

  • Players
  • 17582 battles
  • 3,924
  • Member since:
    01-24-2013

The buff to 246 AP pen on the 430v2 was very necessary. The question is whether or not the dev team understands why it was necessary. The previous value of 219 would have only made sense if we were still talking about a very aggressive brawling playstyle and the expectation of shooting flanks, and clearly that's now off the table. Not to mention that to be an actual upgrade over the 416, it would have to use less HEAT than the 416 does. You aren't going to beat the 416 in per-tier performance, you beat it in profitability.

 

And as of the K-91, the buffs do help its situation but the trick is that its niche is still very exclusive. Some may say that it handles its role a little better than the Leo 1 does but keep in mind the single greatest problem that dedicated snipers deal with:

 



SmokeTheDestroyer563 #17 Posted Jun 10 2018 - 21:06

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 34842 battles
  • 299
  • Member since:
    08-29-2012
For the love of tanks, can you guys please REMOVE PARIS and PROVINCE from tier 6 and up???  The maps are complete [edited], also add some of the old maps back into there place like Northwest, Pearl River, Hidden Valley, Something to spice up your STALE maps and rotation!!!!!!





Also tagged with 1.0.2, feedback

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users