Jump to content


SOLUTION FOR TWO TIER MATCHMAKING GRIPES


11 replies to this topic

Hero_or_Zero #1 Posted Jun 16 2018 - 10:40

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 6043 battles
  • 1
  • [BAL_S] BAL_S
  • Member since:
    10-19-2017
My idea is this......Wargaming should sell tier protection like they do premium accounts, premium ammo or anything else.  What is the point of letting us have rental tanks of T8 grade, then putting us in with T10 so they can use us as toilet paper??  My solution would be to sell tier protection, for any tank over T6, so that a person has a chance to get to know their tank, and actually have some success with tanks they are grinding...I have tanks I don't play anymore because I'm sick of getting crushed by higher tier tanks....WARGAMING you must fix this, you are making the game suck, and hurting your bottom line....think how many more people would buy tanks, if they knew they could play with tanks equal to them so they'd have a chance...come on guys, think out of the box on this....fun equals profits....yes I'm available for consultation...BUT YOU MUST FIX THIS>>>>ITS AN EASY FIX

Springfield_Fats #2 Posted Jun 16 2018 - 10:43

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 10320 battles
  • 249
  • Member since:
    11-04-2014
No they should fix this utter crapwithout making money off it. It's a disgrace the matchmaker has been in the state it is for years and you want them to be paid to not fix it even longer?

kebab6597 #3 Posted Jun 16 2018 - 11:57

    Major

  • Players
  • 57869 battles
  • 9,081
  • [D-DAY] D-DAY
  • Member since:
    04-16-2011

All they have to do is reverse the priority that MM looks for to make a game currently;

 

1. 3/5/7

2. 5/10

3. 15

 

They should make it;

 

1. 15

2. 5/10

3. 3/5/7

 

Or;

 

1. 5/10/

2. 15

3. 3/5/7

 

By doing that you would only see a 2 tier spread very rarely most of your games would be either against same tier or 1 tier above/below



moogleslam #4 Posted Jun 16 2018 - 14:05

    Major

  • Players
  • 45589 battles
  • 4,917
  • [GURUS] GURUS
  • Member since:
    12-20-2013

View Postkebab6597, on Jun 16 2018 - 06:57, said:

All they have to do is reverse the priority that MM looks for to make a game currently;

 

1. 3/5/7

2. 5/10

3. 15

 

They should make it;

 

1. 15

2. 5/10

3. 3/5/7

 

Or;

 

1. 5/10/

2. 15

3. 3/5/7

 

By doing that you would only see a 2 tier spread very rarely most of your games would be either against same tier or 1 tier above/below

 

Don't think I've ever seen any new MM ideas that I like.  Until now.  This one makes a lot of sense.

dominator_98 #5 Posted Jun 16 2018 - 14:10

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 22956 battles
  • 3,839
  • [PUBBY] PUBBY
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

WG will never fix this because being bottom tier means you meet more heavily armored tanks and have to shoot more gold, which means more premium sales. They’re so addicted to profit from prem sales that they’d rather remove pref mm from all premiums than actually fix the mm. It’s quite disgusting honestly.

 

How much gold did you guys have to shoot in Frontline? I don’t think they want that much profitability for the player in pub matches because they would rather milk the player base for more money.



IX_Zann #6 Posted Jun 16 2018 - 14:30

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 42446 battles
  • 916
  • Member since:
    04-23-2012

Circonflexes proposed reversing the MM priorities to 15; 5/10; 3/5/7 when the PMM issue first exploded on us.

 

I like the idea.



Hellsfog #7 Posted Jun 16 2018 - 20:20

    Major

  • Players
  • 37823 battles
  • 6,612
  • [VILIN] VILIN
  • Member since:
    06-22-2011

Because having three +2 tanks in a game makes it unplayable for the other 12 tanks? Probably not. It is more likely that the OP has bought a ton of higher tier premium tank which he has no idea how to play.  If blaming MM makes him feel better about his purchases, that's fine but no amount of MM is going to suddenly make him not terrible. 

 

The idea of changing the template MM prefers has been bounced around a long time before this thread. It simply seems to be a way for tier 8's to curb stomp on tier 6 more, which doesn't really address the complaint.  The question to be asked is which tier gets [edited] by this change. The only way to address that problem, in my opinion, is to change MM to +2/-1. Then tiers 9, 7 and 5 will get [edited]. So it's not as easy as all that.

 

Personally, I would revert to the old MM and watch as the same players who hated 3/5/7 complain about being in a match with 7 +2 tanks.  



Dadrox #8 Posted Jun 16 2018 - 21:00

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 16236 battles
  • 530
  • [77ARC] 77ARC
  • Member since:
    03-02-2013

What does this have to do with the WGC Launcher sub forum you're posting in?  Are you lost?

 

 



_Tsavo_ #9 Posted Jun 16 2018 - 21:05

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 45467 battles
  • 19,349
  • [BRVE] BRVE
  • Member since:
    02-16-2011

"I want to pay for easy-mode"

 

Yeah, no.



WIZD #10 Posted Jun 17 2018 - 18:57

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 12043 battles
  • 775
  • [ASP] ASP
  • Member since:
    08-16-2015

View Postdominator_98, on Jun 16 2018 - 14:10, said:

WG will never fix this because being bottom tier means you meet more heavily armored tanks and have to shoot more gold, which means more premium sales. They’re so addicted to profit from prem sales that they’d rather remove pref mm from all premiums than actually fix the mm. It’s quite disgusting honestly.

 

How much gold did you guys have to shoot in Frontline? I don’t think they want that much profitability for the player in pub matches because they would rather milk the player base for more money.

 

Aren't they removing gold rounds? Maybe just "fixing" them idk I heard something about it.

Springfield_Fats #11 Posted Jun 19 2018 - 02:48

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 10320 battles
  • 249
  • Member since:
    11-04-2014

View PostWIZD, on Jun 17 2018 - 18:57, said:

 

Aren't they removing gold rounds? Maybe just "fixing" them idk I heard something about it.

 

They wont. Even as credit only improved shells, people are just going to buy gold to convert to credits to afford more of them.

Fireplace4 #12 Posted Jun 20 2018 - 18:29

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 30632 battles
  • 522
  • Member since:
    11-05-2011

View PostSpringfield_Fats, on Jun 18 2018 - 20:48, said:

 

They wont. Even as credit only improved shells, people are just going to buy gold to convert to credits to afford more of them.

I really hope people aren't converting gold to credits... It's such a waste of money...





Reply to this topic



  
For security reasons, please do not provide your personal data or the personal data of a third party here because we might be unable to protect such data in accordance with the Wargaming Privacy Policy.


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users