WOLPERTINGER_, on Jun 26 2018 - 11:01, said:

For how long....another six (6) month since two are already in test since last year.
With all the maps that have been put on the back burner to make them HD the current map selection is "ABYSMAL"! 
Abysmal? I wouldn't say that. "Stale," perhaps, but not abysmal. Abbey, Airfield, Cliff, El Halluf, Ensk, Erlenberg, Fisherman's Bay, Fjords, Glacier, himmelsdorf, Karelia, Klondike, Lakeville, Live Oaks, Malinovka, Mannerheim line, Mines, Mountain Pass, Murovanka, Nebelburg, Overlord, Paris, Prokhorovka, Province, Redshire, Ruinberg, Sand River, Serene Coast, Siegfried Line, Steppes, Tundra, Westfield. That's 32 maps. Pilsen is being reworked and is likely to return, Port is being reworked and is likely to return, Northwest is being reworked, and might return. Dragon ridge? Probably not. Pearl River? Possibly. Players have mentioned they would like to see the return of Mittengard and Ghost town as well. It's possible these will return as well.
Minsk and Studzianki have undergone quite a few waves of changes while they were on Supertest. As Gnomon pointed out they are in the polishing stages (if you check out the videos of studzianki and Minsk you'll notice that they are quite pretty/polished) so probably quite soon.
To clarify, the old maps weren't just "Made HD" - they were rebuilt from scratch. 30+ Maps in about a year's turnaround.
It's definitely difficult to process a chorus of dissenting voices, and figure out which needs to address. There isn't one correct side, in my opinion. Areas were flattened and widened in an attempt to address the concern that too many maps feature corridors, and those changes were received with a substantially negative response. If it's not a corridor then it's a field of death.
And it's not like we're not listening. Erlenberg has already received some changes. Mines is being looked at. Fjords is being looked at. It's not like we're ignoring feedback; these things take time.