Jump to content


Ban stat padding unicums


  • Please log in to reply
213 replies to this topic

Poll: Ban stat padding unicums from random battles (185 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 100 battles in order to participate this poll.

Should WG ban stat padding unicums?

  1. Of course (65 votes [35.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 35.14%

  2. No,i am a stat padding unicum (120 votes [64.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 64.86%

Vote Hide poll

GeorgePreddy #41 Posted Jun 30 2018 - 20:33

    Major

  • Players
  • 14345 battles
  • 10,438
  • Member since:
    04-11-2013

View PostWOLPERTINGER_, on Jun 30 2018 - 15:44, said:

 

Just pick up the pace and carry. You might actually improve your skill and stats in this game.

 

Wasting your text, WOLPER, that type of player is never going to make the large invest of time and effort required to improve their skill and consequently their stats. Whining, complaining and hating on WoT is much easier and convenient.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Spammy #42 Posted Jun 30 2018 - 20:35

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 62523 battles
  • 272
  • [4HIM] 4HIM
  • Member since:
    08-01-2010

View Posttemplars8, on Jun 30 2018 - 11:11, said:

Simple question IF the game detects that a certain player barely moves he gets banned from random battles,they can pad in SH,CWs and advances.

Really bad players such as yourself label any good player doing something said bad player doesn't approve of as a stat padder. Here's a sad truth that you won't be able to deal with: these unicums are simply much better players than you and understand the game far better. 


Edited by Spammy, Jun 30 2018 - 20:36.


24cups #43 Posted Jun 30 2018 - 20:38

    Major

  • Players
  • 23190 battles
  • 2,729
  • [D-DAY] D-DAY
  • Member since:
    01-25-2013

View Posttemplars8, on Jun 30 2018 - 12:34, said:

 

i am tired of repeating myself over and over again,my EU account has 7k recents/48  WR

How could you be so good on EU but so bad on NA ?



Rush_91 #44 Posted Jun 30 2018 - 20:39

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 11904 battles
  • 1,360
  • [FATED] FATED
  • Member since:
    01-23-2016
Wait isn't templars8 the guy with the 6 or 7k wn8 on the EU server that he can't tell us about? Doesn't that make him a stat padding unicum? So should we just ban templars8?

24cups #45 Posted Jun 30 2018 - 20:41

    Major

  • Players
  • 23190 battles
  • 2,729
  • [D-DAY] D-DAY
  • Member since:
    01-25-2013

View PostUnicorn_, on Jun 30 2018 - 13:36, said:

A game that has players with skilled crews and 6th sense, spamming gold VS. new players with stock tanks in low tiers – that's a Rigged game that isn't based on competitive skill. It's why stats are meaningless, and a lot of shills have inflated egos with their pay2win stats. This is game caters to players who don't rely on skill and need handicap built-in advantages over others. That's why there's 3/5/7 and limited available power creeps. This game is all about grinding and buying in-game advantages. It's not about playing with more skill. WoT wants people to believe their games have fair play when they don't. WoT is a freemium pay2win game no better than the likes of Clash of Clans.

What does this have to do with this thread  ?



DrWho_ #46 Posted Jun 30 2018 - 20:49

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 16009 battles
  • 1,265
  • Member since:
    07-29-2017

View PostWOLPERTINGER_, on Jun 30 2018 - 19:38, said:

 

Newsflash....We all started out one day like that!

 

It's still a bad thing. I would have quit this game long ago if I didn't have a friend who's also playing this game and showed me the basics, I was on the verge of quitting when he stepped in. These days they don't bother me because whenever I play lower tiers I can hold my own against those guys for the most part but for a newbie ....

We need newbies to have a reasonably good experience if this game is to survive because over time people move on to other things. Just because you and I worked through it (me with some valuable help) doesn't mean everyone will and we probably lose a good few people who over time would be willing to spend time and money on this game. Not saying it's a *huge* problem but can we really afford to lose players to this at all ?

Winterpeger #47 Posted Jun 30 2018 - 21:41

    Major

  • Players
  • 51233 battles
  • 2,239
  • [DD-S] DD-S
  • Member since:
    10-25-2011

View Posttemplars8, on Jun 30 2018 - 11:34, said:

 

i am tired of repeating myself over and over again,my EU account has 7k recents/48  WR

 

Nope.... as you can not provide any proof of your bs claim..   sorry bull[edited]ting "contract" doesn't cut it.   So until you can provide REAL evidence.. stfu about your imaginary EU account. 

SkaerKrow #48 Posted Jun 30 2018 - 22:08

    Captain

  • Beta Testers
  • 17301 battles
  • 1,492
  • Member since:
    09-24-2010
I’d rather see them forum ban salty whiners, personally.

Silversound #49 Posted Jun 30 2018 - 22:15

    Major

  • Players
  • 38784 battles
  • 4,746
  • [-P-] -P-
  • Member since:
    08-22-2011

View PostUnicorn_, on Jun 30 2018 - 10:41, said:

 

That's because they don't care losing, which is what people mean when they say the game doesn't encourage team play. Those players just want to spam gold for damage so they can boost their WN8 and feel better about themselves. WN8 and WR are BS stats that don't accurately represent skill, but it's the only thing players have to go by. That's why rerolling and stat padding is so popular in this rigged game

 

Triggered?

 

Unicorn you're doing fine for the number of battles you have.

Stop undermining your progress with self pity.

 

Are you an 'Everyone should be equal.' kinda thinker?

If so, where did you pick up that stinkin' thinkin'?

 

Life is not a zero sum game.

 

Sometimes the gold spam, old skewl, try hard, wins a lot guy will be on your team.

Sometimes they will be on the other team.

And more often than not, they will be on both teams.



spud_tuber #50 Posted Jun 30 2018 - 22:38

    Major

  • Players
  • 53417 battles
  • 6,795
  • Member since:
    08-26-2013
I mean, there are players out there who do pad using techniques that might be what the OP is describing. They're not particularly common, though.

Their stats are usually a dead give away as well. Compared to their WR, their spots/game are usually quite low and their DPG high. My rule of thumb is generally wn8 2 color brackets higher than WR*, or maybe 3 if high average tier and/or lots of scouts played.

* using the wotlabs scale.  Again, rule of thumb, I'm sure there are exceptions.

leon_phelps #51 Posted Jun 30 2018 - 22:54

    Major

  • Players
  • 36002 battles
  • 3,422
  • Member since:
    03-25-2012

View Posttemplars8, on Jun 30 2018 - 17:11, said:

Simple question IF the game detects that a certain player barely moves he gets banned from random battles,they can pad in SH,CWs and advances.

Can you show us another stolen picture of a three marked tank please



MountainLion1 #52 Posted Jun 30 2018 - 22:56

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 23248 battles
  • 1,534
  • Member since:
    10-13-2014
What I like about this game is that all are welcome. Just remember when a game starts picking who can play, they may not allow you to play as well. 

templars8 #53 Posted Jun 30 2018 - 23:07

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 25616 battles
  • 265
  • Member since:
    09-15-2012

View PostDrWho_, on Jun 30 2018 - 19:49, said:

 

It's still a bad thing. I would have quit this game long ago if I didn't have a friend who's also playing this game and showed me the basics, I was on the verge of quitting when he stepped in. These days they don't bother me because whenever I play lower tiers I can hold my own against those guys for the most part but for a newbie ....

We need newbies to have a reasonably good experience if this game is to survive because over time people move on to other things. Just because you and I worked through it (me with some valuable help) doesn't mean everyone will and we probably lose a good few people who over time would be willing to spend time and money on this game. Not saying it's a *huge* problem but can we really afford to lose players to this at all ?

That friend didnt do a good job teaching you the basics



leon_phelps #54 Posted Jun 30 2018 - 23:10

    Major

  • Players
  • 36002 battles
  • 3,422
  • Member since:
    03-25-2012

View PostUnicorn_, on Jun 30 2018 - 18:58, said:

 

I've done that, which is why I stopped caring. It's completely rigged and meaningless. If WG gave me free premium and free OP tanks, my stats would sky rocket just like when I spent a week spamming gold. I stopped playing the game though. Chasing stats in a pay2win game isn't rewarding to me.

Of please tell everyone about the christmas event was to hard for you so you and your buddies quit then you came back because wargaming apologized and compensated you for the unfair event



DrWho_ #55 Posted Jun 30 2018 - 23:48

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 16009 battles
  • 1,265
  • Member since:
    07-29-2017

View Posttemplars8, on Jun 30 2018 - 23:07, said:

That friend didnt do a good job teaching you the basics

 

 

I love you too Tempy



_Tsavo_ #56 Posted Jun 30 2018 - 23:49

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 42749 battles
  • 17,665
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    02-16-2011

View Posttemplars8, on Jun 30 2018 - 17:07, said:

That friend didnt do a good job teaching you the basics

 

He's outperforming you, so he's doing something right.

RedBaronK #57 Posted Jun 30 2018 - 23:51

    Major

  • Players
  • 40855 battles
  • 2,990
  • [MAIDS] MAIDS
  • Member since:
    11-26-2012
This post wins the award for either the dumbest post of the year, or lamest troll of the year.

DrWho_ #58 Posted Jul 01 2018 - 00:04

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 16009 battles
  • 1,265
  • Member since:
    07-29-2017

View Post_Tsavo_, on Jun 30 2018 - 23:49, said:

 

He's outperforming you, so he's doing something right.

 

Would be kinda embarrassing if I didn't outperform Tempy with over 10k battles on my account, doesn't pretty much everyone do that once they've learned how to play ?

TAR_b #59 Posted Jul 01 2018 - 01:49

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 30335 battles
  • 607
  • Member since:
    08-22-2012
WHEN IS THE 1v1????!!!!!!

Unicorn_ #60 Posted Jul 01 2018 - 03:06

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 6350 battles
  • 367
  • Member since:
    02-10-2015

View PostSilversound, on Jun 30 2018 - 22:15, said:

 

Triggered?

 

Unicorn you're doing fine for the number of battles you have.

Stop undermining your progress with self pity.

 

Are you an 'Everyone should be equal.' kinda thinker?

If so, where did you pick up that stinkin' thinkin'?

 

Life is not a zero sum game.

 

Sometimes the gold spam, old skewl, try hard, wins a lot guy will be on your team.

Sometimes they will be on the other team.

And more often than not, they will be on both teams.

 

lol, what self-pity? I stopped playing the game.

I'm a "game should be fair" thinker. Fair doesn't mean equal. It means skill is the deciding factor in the game. Grinding and buying in-game advantages is not rewarding for people who want real competition without any unfair advantages. That's why Pay2win is universally looked down on in the gaming. I'm not insecure enough to take advantage of a rigged system and be proud about it.
 




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users