Jump to content


What are the tanks you think need a buff?


  • Please log in to reply
84 replies to this topic

terminator2114 #1 Posted Jul 09 2018 - 15:27

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 32244 battles
  • 151
  • [-A1D] -A1D
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013

These I believe need a buff

-maurbrecher- more armor, less dpm. (makes this a true heavy

-amx 65t- better frontal hull, engine and turret. (this would make id a better hull down tank)

-t-34-2- more accuracy on the 122 (make this tank actually good.

-leapard1-give an alternative turret with more armor with worse gun handling, increase dpm on stock turret (would make it competitive against other meds)

-m41 bulldog, it doesn't make sense this has 100 less hp than the 90mm version



gatorken #2 Posted Jul 09 2018 - 15:32

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 73687 battles
  • 285
  • [M-M-E] M-M-E
  • Member since:
    12-29-2013
IS-M - maneuverability....and MM for all tier 8's.

HENRYOFORANGE #3 Posted Jul 09 2018 - 15:36

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 9944 battles
  • 308
  • [DEVON] DEVON
  • Member since:
    08-14-2011
tiger-p- buff the cheeks and give it better speed

xXTheGameAceXx #4 Posted Jul 09 2018 - 15:37

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 9580 battles
  • 346
  • Member since:
    10-07-2015
Too many to name. The reward tanks are definitely big ones that could use love though. Jagdpanzer IV is another off the top of my head that's a really garbage tank. Same with the T25/2. Both could use some serious pen buffs.

Zanarkand_C #5 Posted Jul 09 2018 - 15:47

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 25303 battles
  • 327
  • [CLAWS] CLAWS
  • Member since:
    12-06-2014

STB-1 

 

Either aim time buff "or" slight turret armor buff.

 

Also Obj.277

 

Slight upper plate armor buff. T10 has more reliable upper hull armor... in my opinion.


Edited by Zanarkand_C, Jul 09 2018 - 15:49.


NiteDog #6 Posted Jul 09 2018 - 15:52

    Major

  • Players
  • 27208 battles
  • 6,137
  • [HSOLO] HSOLO
  • Member since:
    08-09-2011
Type 59

The_Illusive_Man #7 Posted Jul 09 2018 - 15:58

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 12051 battles
  • 2,087
  • [RDDT] RDDT
  • Member since:
    08-30-2014

T110E5, Reverse the hull nerf, and reduce the size of the tumor.

Challenger, Full turret traverse. And a better turret.

Conway, Full turret traverse.

 

 

There are ALOT of tanks that need buffs.


Edited by The_Illusive_Man, Jul 09 2018 - 16:02.


the_dude_76 #8 Posted Jul 09 2018 - 16:02

    Major

  • Players
  • 31839 battles
  • 2,536
  • [GSRM] GSRM
  • Member since:
    12-27-2011

None, if you find one tank underwhelming pick one of the hundreds of others to play. 

 

Seriously, the arms race needs to stop eventually. There will ALWAYS be tanks that are underwhelming because every time you buff the tanks that are, a new set becomes the bottom of the barrel and people start calling for them to be buffed. It's a never ending, and completely unnecessary, cycle.



Joe150 #9 Posted Jul 09 2018 - 16:02

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 23374 battles
  • 1,767
  • Member since:
    01-09-2016
The Pershing.Either give it some speed or dpm or both.

enya1ius #10 Posted Jul 09 2018 - 16:05

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 27640 battles
  • 197
  • [SBW] SBW
  • Member since:
    01-18-2013

View Postthe_dude_76, on Jul 09 2018 - 15:02, said:

None, if you find one tank underwhelming pick one of the hundreds of others to play. 

 

Seriously, the arms race needs to stop eventually. There will ALWAYS be tanks that are underwhelming because every time you buff the tanks that are, a new set becomes the bottom of the barrel and people start calling for them to be buffed. It's a never ending, and completely unnecessary, cycle.

 

bro, serious question, what do you agree with? all you ever seem to do is jump on threads and muddy the water. if you think that tanks shouldnt be buffed then do you agree that tanks that are overperforming should be nerfed? or just have entirely pointless lines? its easy to disagree, but you never offer a rebuttal. What is the solution for these lines that statistically underperform? or is it just disagree with everything?

 



Tanya_von_Degurechaf #11 Posted Jul 09 2018 - 16:06

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 21236 battles
  • 238
  • [AWOO] AWOO
  • Member since:
    03-14-2014

Some tanks that dont need a buff:

- Maurbrecher: is a premium tank you take this to make some money and not to play all day like a non-prem tank. (and the actually armor is more than enough to rape equal tiers and low tiers and even some tier 9s"

- AMX 65t: in my opnion is more like a better tier 7 than a tier 8, i dont think it does need a buff since you will only take a few days driving to get a tier 9 and going for top of the tree.

-Leopard 1: Well more armor means less speed, i dont trade speed for just a "better turrent armor" plus, a heavy tower is not good if you want gun handling. (check the gun handling of the STB-1, heavy tower and a silly gun handling)

-M41 bulldog: is a Light Tank..your job is scout and only that.

 

Tanks that maybe needs a buff:

T-34-2: well, is chinese..BUT imo is more like a tank for "collection" than a tank for you to spend time playing, it can easily face the same "fate" as the (type 59) did, and become a special tank, but maybe with a small armor buff and gun handling, this tank back from the dead. (maybe)

STB-1: Maybe we could give the Leopard 1 aiming time to the STB. (maybe)

E-100: a turrent that can hold heat more easily.? (i can kill E100s so easily)

 

   Well, i have tons of tanks that need buffs/nerfs but well..WG will never listen to us as usual..

 



ethics_gradient #12 Posted Jul 09 2018 - 16:09

    Captain

  • Players
  • 36566 battles
  • 1,973
  • [DHO-X] DHO-X
  • Member since:
    04-22-2011

View Postthe_dude_76, on Jul 09 2018 - 10:02, said:

None, if you find one tank underwhelming pick one of the hundreds of others to play.

 

Seriously, the arms race needs to stop eventually. There will ALWAYS be tanks that are underwhelming because every time you buff the tanks that are, a new set becomes the bottom of the barrel and people start calling for them to be buffed. It's a never ending, and completely unnecessary, cycle.

 

I agree.  Really the better path is nerfing.  It's easier than WoT's pattern of introducing an OP tank that leaves all others relatively unbalanced by comparison.

Edited by ethics_gradient, Jul 09 2018 - 16:09.


el_mucho_dingdong #13 Posted Jul 09 2018 - 16:11

    Captain

  • Players
  • 23370 battles
  • 1,677
  • [NCA] NCA
  • Member since:
    11-01-2012
Arty, all of them.

Tanya_von_Degurechaf #14 Posted Jul 09 2018 - 16:13

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 21236 battles
  • 238
  • [AWOO] AWOO
  • Member since:
    03-14-2014
In my honest opnion the new tanks that WG is adding to this game is literally being way too good to fight against the old ones that we have...so is more like Nerf them instead buff. (but we have to agree that some tanks in World of Tanks really does need a buff so can back to battle.

Mrbadness87 #15 Posted Jul 09 2018 - 16:15

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 4237 battles
  • 26
  • [TEXAS] TEXAS
  • Member since:
    05-10-2015
imo give a small refund to the buyers of the lefh18b2 and nerf that to be more of a t5 equivalent, instead of a tier 6 equivalent. type t34, is the redhead step bro of the russian t34.   i agree with the e5 being more of a medium then a heavy now.     if i recall i remember old premiums having some weakness compared to tree tanks to offset the extra xp and creds that they make. seems the pay to win is the name of the game now, or pay to have and skip all the learning curve

Edited by Mrbadness87, Jul 09 2018 - 16:17.


Tanya_von_Degurechaf #16 Posted Jul 09 2018 - 16:16

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 21236 battles
  • 238
  • [AWOO] AWOO
  • Member since:
    03-14-2014
Plus we all know as well that 175 gun pen now days is nothing basically.

JEDIDIEUGH #17 Posted Jul 09 2018 - 16:19

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 16083 battles
  • 862
  • [TOMAS] TOMAS
  • Member since:
    12-11-2013

M5 Stuart.  I consider it to be the worst tank in the game. It needs so kind of serious buff and it has needed a buff for yearssss.



Tanya_von_Degurechaf #18 Posted Jul 09 2018 - 16:20

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 21236 battles
  • 238
  • [AWOO] AWOO
  • Member since:
    03-14-2014

View PostJEDIDIEUGH, on Jul 10 2018 - 00:19, said:

M5 Stuart.  I consider it to be the worst tank in the game. It needs so kind of serious buff and it has needed a buff for yearssss.

 

Why buff a low tier? in other words buffing low tiers will only call "stats padders" to the game.

moogleslam #19 Posted Jul 09 2018 - 16:22

    Major

  • Players
  • 36489 battles
  • 3,777
  • [CLAWS] CLAWS
  • Member since:
    12-20-2013

Off the top of my head (i.e. not looking through a bunch of stats to figure this out):

 

  • Churchill Gun Carrier
  • Tiger (P)
  • STB-1
  • FCM 50 t
  • T34
  • IS-6


Tanya_von_Degurechaf #20 Posted Jul 09 2018 - 16:24

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 21236 battles
  • 238
  • [AWOO] AWOO
  • Member since:
    03-14-2014

Bring back this glorious machine! (only the strong ppl know)

 


Edited by Tanya_von_Degurechaf, Jul 09 2018 - 16:24.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users