Jump to content


OBj430U need massive hull armor nerf.


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

ArcticTankHunter #1 Posted Sep 18 2018 - 20:19

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 13703 battles
  • 527
  • [OSU-V] OSU-V
  • Member since:
    05-22-2014

The 5th time I've face this tank. But this time this player didn't spam premuim rounds so I block a few shots unlike last games where every shot penetrations without aiming for the commander hatch.

 

This is absolute proof Obj430U armor is broken. Even the side. I started firing premuim rounds and it also bounce.

 

http://wotreplays.eu/site/4544950#cliff-arctictankhunter-tortoise

 

Please nerf its side armor at least so it can't side scrap like other Russian meds, it already has OP front hull armor. Its broken as fk.

 

WG is better off adding the T-64 at this rate.


Edited by ArcticTankHunter, Sep 18 2018 - 20:21.


BabA_YA6A #2 Posted Sep 18 2018 - 20:25

    Captain

  • Players
  • 26287 battles
  • 1,157
  • [GRIMY] GRIMY
  • Member since:
    08-09-2013

View PostArcticTankHunter, on Sep 19 2018 - 03:19, said:

The 5th time I've face this tank. But this time this player didn't spam premuim rounds so I block a few shots unlike last games where every shot penetrations without aiming for the commander hatch.

 

This is absolute proof Obj430U armor is broken. Even the side. I started firing premuim rounds and it also bounce.

 

http://wotreplays.eu/site/4544950#cliff-arctictankhunter-tortoise

 

Please nerf its side armor at least so it can't side scrap like other Russian meds, it already has OP front hull armor. Its broken as fk.

 

WG is better off adding the T-64 at this rate.

 



rohanikov123 #3 Posted Sep 18 2018 - 20:28

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 25783 battles
  • 341
  • Member since:
    03-14-2012
Most of the shots that you bounced were either because it missed the side and hit the upperplate/turret or hit the tracks but missed the hull. You only failed to pen one side shot and thats because it went into the spaced armor along the side at a pretty good angle.

Benjeeh_CA #4 Posted Sep 18 2018 - 20:30

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 30075 battles
  • 880
  • [DBLTP] DBLTP
  • Member since:
    04-18-2012
They are adding a t-64 prototype the obj 432 premium LT

Hellsfog #5 Posted Sep 18 2018 - 20:34

    Major

  • Players
  • 34037 battles
  • 5,074
  • [_SF_] _SF_
  • Member since:
    06-22-2011
How do you have the stats you have with shooting that bad? By the way the other tortoise bounced two point blank shot off of you, the tortoise needs armor nerf. 

agtdetructor #6 Posted Sep 18 2018 - 20:37

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 15170 battles
  • 1,178
  • [TAM10] TAM10
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014
Moderated by Volier_Zcit

Edited by Volier_Zcit, Sep 19 2018 - 06:45.


BabA_YA6A #7 Posted Sep 18 2018 - 20:44

    Captain

  • Players
  • 26287 battles
  • 1,157
  • [GRIMY] GRIMY
  • Member since:
    08-09-2013
Moderated by Volier_Zcit

 


Edited by Volier_Zcit, Sep 19 2018 - 06:46.


Blazzy #8 Posted Sep 18 2018 - 20:46

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 30600 battles
  • 902
  • Member since:
    03-05-2012
It's Russian, it'll get buffed soon.

GeorgePreddy #9 Posted Sep 18 2018 - 20:53

    Major

  • Players
  • 14345 battles
  • 9,820
  • [L_LEG] L_LEG
  • Member since:
    04-11-2013

Dear WG;

 

I like my 430U... please don't change it.  But if you feel you must change it, just buff all the armor on it just a bit and make it about 10 kliks faster.

 

Thank you.

 

 



ZoM_2014 #10 Posted Sep 18 2018 - 21:00

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 14800 battles
  • 200
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014

View PostArcticTankHunter, on Sep 18 2018 - 13:19, said:

The 5th time I've face this tank. But this time this player didn't spam premuim rounds so I block a few shots unlike last games where every shot penetrations without aiming for the commander hatch.

 

This is absolute proof Obj430U armor is broken. Even the side. I started firing premuim rounds and it also bounce.

 

http://wotreplays.eu/site/4544950#cliff-arctictankhunter-tortoise

 

Please nerf its side armor at least so it can't side scrap like other Russian meds, it already has OP front hull armor. Its broken as fk.

 

WG is better off adding the T-64 at this rate.

 

rant rant rant

Hurk #11 Posted Sep 18 2018 - 23:05

    Major

  • Players
  • 51687 battles
  • 17,158
  • [KGR] KGR
  • Member since:
    09-30-2012

its fing stupid OP. 



leeuniverse #12 Posted Sep 19 2018 - 01:15

    Major

  • Players
  • 34664 battles
  • 7,234
  • [LAMP] LAMP
  • Member since:
    01-30-2013

Block Quote

OBj430U need massive hull armor nerf.

 

Wrong...!  Medium Armor and many Heavy Armor tanks need a massive Hull armor BUFF...  Heavy's generally don't have the armor they should actually have to be enjoyable classes to play.

430U is actually how medium armor SHOULD work.

 

Further, what is wrong with you all.

Do you not comprehend that there are Heavy's that in fact are Light tanks, and all kinds of other variations?

The tank is essentially a Heavy tank, though more accurately between heavy and medium, though more on the Heavy side.

 

And FYI, per-tank Winrates DON'T MEAN SHIP....!!!

I have tanks that's I'm ship in but have amazing Winrates, and I have tanks I'm good in with crappy or mediocre Winrates.

Stop looking at "per- tank" Winrates, they don't mean anything in general.  Not saying it can't be useful info, but as a general rule you all are using it wrong if you're using it to claim the tank is "op" because of its good Winrate.

 

Another key factor ignored is the amount of UNICORNS (good players) playing the tank compared to the general populous.  There is simply not enough regular people playing the tank to judge it as "op".



Duqe #13 Posted Sep 19 2018 - 01:26

    Major

  • Players
  • 26170 battles
  • 8,462
  • [BERT] BERT
  • Member since:
    06-19-2011
It's doing pretty well considering it's just about as utterly broken and overpowered, post-meta dominant as all other Russian tree mediums are.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users