Jump to content


- - - - -

Global Map Season 10 - Feedback


  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

Gnomon #1 Posted Sep 24 2018 - 16:19

    Training & QA Specialist

  • Administrator
  • 803 battles
  • 372
  • [WGA] WGA
  • Member since:
    11-23-2015

Hey, everyone! 

 

Hope that you're having a great Monday! 

 

As of today, the new season of the Global Map is now live. If you'd like more info on Season 10 of the Global Map, be sure to check out the following video or open the spoiler below: 

 

 

Global Map: Season 10

 

Now that the Global Map is live, we'd like to get your feedback over it. Please feel free to reply below with your feedback, comments, and suggestions about Season 10 of the Global Map.

 

Thanks, everyone! Hope you have a great day! 



MacDaddyMatty #2 Posted Sep 24 2018 - 16:21

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 31236 battles
  • 6,892
  • [D-DAY] D-DAY
  • Member since:
    10-07-2016

http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/587213-the-juice-is-not-worth-the-squeeze/

 

Block Quote

D-DAY is still unsure what our level of participation will be in Season 10.

Of course, we'll know better once (if?) WG posts the full set of rules.


 

In the past we have gone whole-hog on the Clan War Season, and also we have played sporadically.

Season 10 is slated to be 3 months long with a reward of cammo. We just do not see that being worth the grind, and burning out our members and much of their credits.

(The Juice... is not worth the squeeze... for us).


 

At this time we are anticipating setting a few days each week for raiding on the GM and convoys.

Most like in coordination with our bigger badder clan friends from previous Seasons.

We will use the Season as training for our newer members and callers, as we prepare for the next Campaign. Meanwhile, you'll still see us doing Advances and other detachment activity.


 

This is an FYI for clans we're worked closely with in the past.

As always, plans change, but we'll have to see what the final Season 10 rules are.


 

What are your clan's plans for Season 10?

 This was before we found out most battles would be on the LATM server...

 



H0D0R_ #3 Posted Sep 24 2018 - 16:23

    Captain

  • Players
  • 17285 battles
  • 1,855
  • [MAHOU] MAHOU
  • Member since:
    09-30-2013
This wont go over well with 90+ zones being in the LATAM server.

SodiumChIoride #4 Posted Sep 24 2018 - 16:25

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 10499 battles
  • 57
  • [TRY] TRY
  • Member since:
    12-29-2015
Get rid of the LATAM server from the global map. If 90% of the player-base naturally plays on the Central Server, why did you think making 90% of the Land on the Global Map to be on the LATAM server? 

MRPI #5 Posted Sep 24 2018 - 16:31

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 79935 battles
  • 88
  • [CRZY] CRZY
  • Member since:
    02-20-2013
Makes perfect sense, to whom I don't know but perfect sense.

The_Illusive_Man #6 Posted Sep 24 2018 - 16:37

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 13312 battles
  • 4,263
  • Member since:
    08-30-2014

If the LATAM server provinces are not removed/ reduced, then CW is dead. Here is a way to help prevent this:

 

Every clan can select one server before starting each CW season. That server is the server they will play on when defending. ALL landing zones are on the CENTRAL server.



MacDaddyMatty #7 Posted Sep 24 2018 - 16:43

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 31236 battles
  • 6,892
  • [D-DAY] D-DAY
  • Member since:
    10-07-2016

Growth market?

Why do I have the feeling that WG is encouraging / grooming SA clans for future CW leadership.

Could the growth of SA membership be surpassing NA membership?



Bae_Suzy #8 Posted Sep 24 2018 - 16:55

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 9504 battles
  • 538
  • Member since:
    11-07-2017

BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW | BTW |  

Edited by KeepYourselfSafe_xD, Dec 06 2018 - 10:52.


noboater #9 Posted Sep 24 2018 - 17:00

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 34441 battles
  • 217
  • [J4F] J4F
  • Member since:
    10-30-2013
Is that taps i hear playing in the background?

dominator_98 #10 Posted Sep 24 2018 - 17:14

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 22956 battles
  • 3,839
  • [PUBBY] PUBBY
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014
Can I get a big F for the participation in this season? I played over 100 battles during the two week campaign, doubt if I’ll play more than 10 battles in three months if all the battles are gonna be on LATAM.

Devildog8 #11 Posted Sep 24 2018 - 17:30

    Major

  • Players
  • 11075 battles
  • 7,566
  • [CRZY] CRZY
  • Member since:
    12-26-2011
LOL what did I say?  Crap Show?  here it is folks

BigDollarBillz #12 Posted Sep 24 2018 - 17:59

    Major

  • Players
  • 38764 battles
  • 4,362
  • [SBW] SBW
  • Member since:
    08-28-2011
Looks like they fixed the map.

Gnomon #13 Posted Sep 26 2018 - 16:49

    Training & QA Specialist

  • Administrator
  • 803 battles
  • 372
  • [WGA] WGA
  • Member since:
    11-23-2015

View PostBigDollarBillz, on Sep 24 2018 - 10:59, said:

Looks like they fixed the map.

 

Yup, that was just an error with the map. Cabbage clarified it here:

 

View PostCabbageMechanic, on Sep 24 2018 - 11:06, said:

Hey Tankers,

There was an error in the setup that had a bunch of provinces listed in LATAM that has since been corrected.  Some people may still be seeing that, a cache clear should show the map as it is now - fixed (according to 1984BigBrother).

 

Sorry for any confusion caused by the Provinces! Please let me know if y'all have any other feedback about Season 10 so I can add it to my report. Thanks!  

 



MacDaddyMatty #14 Posted Sep 27 2018 - 12:34

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 31236 battles
  • 6,892
  • [D-DAY] D-DAY
  • Member since:
    10-07-2016

View PostGnomon, on Sep 26 2018 - 10:49, said:

 

Yup, that was just an error with the map. Cabbage clarified it here:

 

 

Sorry for any confusion caused by the Provinces! Please let me know if y'all have any other feedback about Season 10 so I can add it to my report. Thanks!

 

 

Hey Gnom,

Feedback on the CW pyramid scheme from a bunch of try-hards loved by RNG.

;)

 

I can see this being a very useful tool for big clans and their subs. Much less chance of defaults and getting overwhelmed by coordinated attacks by other clans.  However, we tends not to hold land (partly because we have more fun chasing missions, and partly because other clans wont let us... tha bastids!) So, for us there's no benefit in giving up 20% of our influence/gold to another bunch of guys (unless we're missing something in the mechanics). Which is a bummer because diplomacy is fun.


 

Encourage Participation

Have you guys considered a 24 hr version of alliances where 2 clans can use each other as Legionaries (like in advances), and both participants get a Clan credit booster or something to encourage participation? None of the 20% nonsense, just a simple alliance. This would allow small clans to band together and be able to field a team. It would also allow medium clans (like us) to pull a smaller clan in for a short duration and get their guys some GM experience, as well as have big clans grab us to help fill the ranks to avoid days that would otherwise be defaults.

IMHO, something like this not only would get more people / clans involved, but also foster good will amongst clans.

 


Edited by MacDaddyMatty, Sep 27 2018 - 12:35.


SparkingPot #15 Posted Nov 18 2018 - 19:23

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 76949 battles
  • 23
  • Member since:
    02-04-2013

Alliances and convoys? This has turned into a joke. The top clans have alliances with the other top clans - another pyramid scheme where only the top clans succeed. The minor powers gain little in being a part of the alliance. Again the clan wars are tilted in favor of the top clans. What advantage does being a minor power in an alliance have? Give another clan 20% of your gold and receive next to nothing in return?

 

The convoys started and we were expecting that the minor powers in the alliance would be transporting to the major powers instead we're seeing clans transporting gold to themselves? What is with that?

 

We were also expecting to attack the alliance minor powers convoys who are supposed to be transporting the gold instead we're fighting the major power in the alliance (another top 10 clan). To make it competitive, only the minor powers should be allowed to battle in convoys. 

 

The bottom line is the top clans once again get all the gold and the provinces. 


Edited by SparkingPot, Nov 18 2018 - 19:23.


marianobernas #16 Posted Dec 18 2018 - 01:21

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 28365 battles
  • 17
  • [TAM10] TAM10
  • Member since:
    07-11-2012

This global map season ended preaty bad. All the big clans got in 1 single alliance and split the map for themselves, less important clans has no chance of getting anything good out of this. the big 3 alliances didnt even attacked eachother and they even became 1 big alliance at the last day of the season. Like a championship where all teams arrange matches.

Now that you are giving bonds to those big clans, they have now more advantage against minor clans that cant get bonds equipment, and not only that, after the season ended, you organized a tournament between those big clans and give them even more bonds...

How i suggest solving this issue and making more competitive for all:

-Get rid of bonds equipment

-In battle penalization for each province they own (-1% vehicle statistics per province or something like that so they cant have 40 provinces each clan, or if they can, well, they realy deserve it)

-And bring back tier 8 and tier 6 global map for even smaller clans so they can start playing competitive games. (I suggest 15 vs 15 even at low tiers). And the clans that participate in one tier cant participate in the other






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users