Jump to content


when are we going to get some new Artillery


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

Muzzlebrakes2017 #1 Posted Oct 08 2018 - 15:57

    Private

  • Players
  • 8536 battles
  • 9
  • [CDN] CDN
  • Member since:
    12-14-2012
i would love to see some chinese or another nation with some artillery. Is this possible or going to happen at any point.

fred_632 #2 Posted Oct 08 2018 - 15:59

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 6430 battles
  • 198
  • Member since:
    09-15-2015

We don't have time for that kind of negativity in the game. We have enough "balanced" arty

 

If you want to play with Artillery go join the army


Edited by fred_632, Oct 08 2018 - 16:01.


riff_ #3 Posted Oct 08 2018 - 16:01

    Major

  • Players
  • 28830 battles
  • 10,120
  • Member since:
    08-02-2013

Soon.

WG will introduce some vehicle that the majority of players do not like and do not want in the game.


:)


Edited by riff_, Oct 08 2018 - 16:02.


Vulcan_Spectre #4 Posted Oct 08 2018 - 16:01

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 3818 battles
  • 614
  • [XGD] XGD
  • Member since:
    12-25-2017
probally never, because there were only so many artys made WWI through the cold war. and not enough of any nation, unless WG made an all arty nation mixing all nations artys it wont happen

Muzzlebrakes2017 #5 Posted Oct 08 2018 - 16:03

    Private

  • Players
  • 8536 battles
  • 9
  • [CDN] CDN
  • Member since:
    12-14-2012

View Postfred_632, on Oct 08 2018 - 14:59, said:

We don't have time for that kind of negativity in the game. We have enough "balanced" arty

 

If you want to play with Artillery go join the army

 

didnt ask for your opinion on them just because you cant play them

Muzzlebrakes2017 #6 Posted Oct 08 2018 - 16:05

    Private

  • Players
  • 8536 battles
  • 9
  • [CDN] CDN
  • Member since:
    12-14-2012

View PostVulcan_Spectre, on Oct 08 2018 - 15:01, said:

probally never, because there were only so many artys made WWI through the cold war. and not enough of any nation, unless WG made an all arty nation mixing all nations artys it wont happen

 

and again this is also WWII tanks as well an the japanese had artillery in WWII so did most other nations

Vulcan_Spectre #7 Posted Oct 08 2018 - 16:14

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 3818 battles
  • 614
  • [XGD] XGD
  • Member since:
    12-25-2017

View PostMuzzlebrakes2017, on Oct 08 2018 - 10:05, said:

 

and again this is also WWII tanks as well an the japanese had artillery in WWII so did most other nations

 

ok they had arty. but they wernt moutned on tank hulls

 

and its not WWII tanks, do you know when the M48 patton was used? or the M103A2? or the m51 sheridan? and the chaffee and m41 bulldog was korean war so was the M36 KR



heavymetal1967 #8 Posted Oct 08 2018 - 16:16

    Major

  • Players
  • 71527 battles
  • 21,049
  • [HSOLO] HSOLO
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012

We're not because more would screw up their cap limit.  Though they may bring the Lef and/or Sexton out for a limited time run/event prize every now and then.

 

From last month.

 

Tanker's Day Q&A from Rita's. Posted on her site 9-10-18.

 

https://ritastatusreport.live/2018/09/10/wg-minsk-tankers-day-qa/

 

– Crew perks against stunning: There are a few things being looked to in the crew skill rework along these lines.

 

– The crew skill rework is continuing to be worked on, though it isn’t an easy process. There are people who have a huge amount of time invested in perks. We’ll announce something in the near future.

 

– Urgent action on the arty is not expected. No real concrete plans in the future.

 

– Artillery: We believe that the current mechanic is quite enough to satisfy all the fans of the SPGs. No plans for adding new branches, though there is plenty of material.

 

 

 

 



Christojojo #9 Posted Oct 08 2018 - 16:24

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 34591 battles
  • 2,492
  • [CHEAP] CHEAP
  • Member since:
    10-09-2010

View PostMuzzlebrakes2017, on Oct 08 2018 - 09:57, said:

i would love to see some chinese or another nation with some artillery. Is this possible or going to happen at any point.

 

Too many cry babies that think they deserve to win every game to ever have more arty introduced.

BattlecryGWJ #10 Posted Oct 08 2018 - 17:00

    Major

  • Players
  • 35335 battles
  • 7,394
  • [RSRDD] RSRDD
  • Member since:
    12-20-2011
We'll probably see new artillery sometime after players stop complaining about it.

LeaveIT2Beaver #11 Posted Oct 08 2018 - 17:12

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 37234 battles
  • 9,915
  • [J4F] J4F
  • Member since:
    07-04-2014
I can hear the triggering from here ... :trollface:

_Tsavo_ #12 Posted Oct 08 2018 - 17:15

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 45467 battles
  • 19,349
  • [BRVE] BRVE
  • Member since:
    02-16-2011
I'd hope not,  I don't think adding more arty would be healthy for the game

Mikosah #13 Posted Oct 08 2018 - 18:03

    Major

  • Players
  • 17582 battles
  • 4,430
  • Member since:
    01-24-2013
We've all seen just how eager WG is to pump out as many premiums as humanly possible even in spite of all the criticism they get for doing so. It should really give pause to think that premium SPGs are the one thing they refuse to hawk at us. If it is just a vocal minority that would oppose premium SPGs and if the mechanics truly are finalized and perfect, why on earth wouldn't we be up to our necks on premium SPGs?

zimmlock #14 Posted Nov 09 2018 - 10:36

    Corporal

  • Beta Testers
  • 40100 battles
  • 48
  • [9-PDH] 9-PDH
  • Member since:
    01-11-2011
Maybe WG can give the arty's each 4 rounds of AP back to silence the anti arty lobby. Arty is the most nerved thing in the game, not only the machines them selves, but also by the terrain, maps are more open, with virtual no cover, castles have been added to rims of mountains, mountains have been reshaped. No ! arty deserves better.

Edited by zimmlock, Nov 09 2018 - 10:37.


Tank_You_All #15 Posted Nov 12 2018 - 19:24

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 43599 battles
  • 166
  • [-23-] -23-
  • Member since:
    01-17-2015
The people that like to hide in the rear in a bush no matter the class that they are playing tend to complain most about arty. In the real world, shoot and scoot is a life saving doctrine. What those people hate is the situation where they are camped, get uncovered and the arty that has been waiting then sends a shell that will arrive in three seconds their way. Yes, their sixth sense went off, but they said to them selves that nothing would happen. In other words, the people that feel that they should not have to consider where a shot from the arty may come from, these are those that complain the most. Just for fun, watch a Unicum replay sometimes. They talk about taking being arty safe into their game play. The point is, arty is real people, it can mess up your life in the real world and belongs in the game.

Primace #16 Posted Nov 13 2018 - 03:26

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 9 battles
  • 270
  • [FDM] FDM
  • Member since:
    07-18-2012
there suppose to be a Chinese arty line, until the KDW halts their partnership with WG 

xN2deepx #17 Posted Dec 22 2018 - 07:53

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 48422 battles
  • 28
  • Member since:
    02-21-2013
[edited]all arty and [edited]all arty players......nuff said

xN2deepx #18 Posted Dec 22 2018 - 07:54

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 48422 battles
  • 28
  • Member since:
    02-21-2013
fukk all arty and fukk all arty shat lord players

KaiserWilhelmShatner #19 Posted Dec 22 2018 - 08:29

    Major

  • Players
  • 16742 battles
  • 4,752
  • [F_O_G] F_O_G
  • Member since:
    03-03-2012

View PostxN2deepx, on Dec 21 2018 - 22:54, said:

fukk all arty and fukk all arty shat lord players

 

Did someone miss their anger management class and soy latte today?

Ekidutu #20 Posted Dec 22 2018 - 10:43

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 9960 battles
  • 117
  • Member since:
    08-04-2013
Would adding another arty line mean more players playing arty or mostly arty players playing different arty?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users