Jump to content


* * * - - 2 votes

Update 1.2 Feedback


  • Please log in to reply
51 replies to this topic

Poll: Update 1.2 (65 members have cast votes)

Are you enjoying update 1.2 so far?

  1. Yes (33 votes [50.77%])

    Percentage of vote: 50.77%

  2. No (19 votes [29.23%])

    Percentage of vote: 29.23%

  3. Not sure (13 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

What is your favorite new feature?

  1. Obj 279e Campaign (4 votes [6.15%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.15%

  2. New/Reworked Maps (33 votes [50.77%])

    Percentage of vote: 50.77%

  3. Preferential MM Rework (24 votes [36.92%])

    Percentage of vote: 36.92%

  4. New Clan features (Creation for Credits, Clan application process) (4 votes [6.15%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.15%

Are you experiencing any new technical issues with the update? (please elaborate in the thread below)

  1. Yes (25 votes [38.46%])

    Percentage of vote: 38.46%

  2. No (40 votes [61.54%])

    Percentage of vote: 61.54%

Vote Guests cannot vote Hide poll

Rommelman1 #21 Posted Oct 11 2018 - 03:25

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 22545 battles
  • 113
  • [VDLS] VDLS
  • Member since:
    02-10-2017

every single game so far has been total blowout  , glad to see they did nothing for match making , hit registration is terrible , game is worse than ever , i'm done with WoTs and they can keep all their money grabs from now on , enjoy cashing out , and I hope you make enough to retire in the next year , every single person on my friends list and clan is done with this game , so another 100+ quit.

you did exactly what you set out to do , placate your "old time players" over the ones who actually spend money on this game.

 

lets see how this works out for you.

 

this game will die within a year



GuillotineSpirit #22 Posted Oct 11 2018 - 15:17

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 17669 battles
  • 345
  • Member since:
    04-24-2015




I am seeing a bug with the Accelerate Crew Training box. When you switch back and forth between selecting and deselecting, the tank will render with UK camouflage. Selecting another tank and then returning back to the bugged tank will return to the normal camo. It's not a serious issue, just reporting it so that it is known.

 

 



JTM78 #23 Posted Oct 11 2018 - 15:47

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 23319 battles
  • 1,081
  • [OBSCN] OBSCN
  • Member since:
    08-16-2013
The 112 is still garbage. Does not have enough pen versus tier 8 and against tier 9s 99% of the time it is joke. The armor of the tank does not hold up against tier 8s and is nothing to tier 9s.If the 112 had the is 6's effect armor thickness it might be better but it does not.

The T-34-3 just sucks still. The 182 pen just is not enough with the long aim time, long reload, bad rng and HORRIBLE soft gun stats. It needs more love.

Both of these tanks might be fun versus tier 6 and 7 but they just don't see them!

Lord_Audley_ #24 Posted Oct 12 2018 - 07:54

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 21258 battles
  • 39
  • [REL-A] REL-A
  • Member since:
    05-09-2017

Holy god please change the customization back to what it was.  Please please please stop having James "the iphone guy" design things for the game.  Its a pc game, crap like (spin-out radial menu) that belongs on a phone app - not on pc.  I'm having flashbacks to your "improvement" of personal missions (which made that pretty unusable too) (and new store - old one is so much better).

 

*pc players like functionality, like things be organized in a linear fashion and fully accessible.  We hate things that are animated, or pop-out, or are gimmicky like this - uugh*



Vulcan_Spectre #25 Posted Oct 12 2018 - 15:18

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 3802 battles
  • 601
  • [XGD] XGD
  • Member since:
    12-25-2017

View PostDomoSapien, on Oct 10 2018 - 15:24, said:

Definitely odd. I've been logged in since server went back up. 

 

This was taken about 15 minutes ago.

 

um, why dont you have "accelerate crew training" on? 

 

EDIT: nice camo too


Edited by Vulcan_Spectre, Oct 12 2018 - 15:18.


zhimbo2018 #26 Posted Oct 12 2018 - 15:58

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 6637 battles
  • 38
  • [VAHLA] VAHLA
  • Member since:
    08-01-2018

Running a vanilla client after a clean re-install.

 

1. Since 1.2 dropped I cannot independently join Stronghold skirmishes, either through my clan or as a legionnaire with other clans.  Clicking on the Stronghold button just results in a "loading content" window with a spinning gear that persists.  The only way I can participate in a SH skirmish is if I get a direct invite from the detachment.

 

2. Occasionally completing a mission results in the game "locking up" when it enters the window reporting such.  I have to use a task manager to kill the game client and restart it.  Attempting to use the "Missions" tab while in garage causes the crash to recur.

 

Z

 

 


Edited by zhimbo2018, Oct 12 2018 - 15:59.


Jesse_the_Scout #27 Posted Oct 12 2018 - 20:45

    Captain

  • Players
  • 37790 battles
  • 1,157
  • [EF-WD] EF-WD
  • Member since:
    12-22-2011
Empire Border or whatever is just plain painful. The elevations are so extreme a heavy tank will spend half the game at 10-20kph, no exaggeration. Some of the roads are literally 30 degree turf. This is a bit ridiculous, hills do not need to be cliff faces which drag games out into draws because no one can get anywhere.

anonym_coetYwgaGYR2 #28 Posted Oct 12 2018 - 22:47

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 0 battles
  • 20
  • Member since:
    01-18-2019
Favorite Feature? None of the above. Never saw any new maps or changes to existing.
Technical issues? RNG is the worst I have seen lately. Fired 12 shots and only one was a direct hit. Next game, fired 11 shots, only one direct hit. Minimal damage and no kills. Rounds hitting nowhere near where I was aiming.
Still getting placed bottom tier EVERY battle. Always killed by player 2 tiers higher shooting gold ammo.
Battles last only 4 minutes. Top kills is 1 player with 6 kills and everyone else is 0 to 3 kills.
I'm done. Parking my tanks and finding a different game. I will watch patch notes to see if anything gets done on MM and RNG. Until then, I'm not interested.

WIZD #29 Posted Oct 13 2018 - 15:17

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 12043 battles
  • 765
  • [ASP] ASP
  • Member since:
    08-16-2015
Just played Empire's Border. Who designs these maps? K lines side has 3/4 of the map that is behind a hill. A line has 1-2 line (where the fighting will occur). They need to push down that and then push to the center of the map to reach the enemy base. K line pushes up 1-2 and reaches A line's base. How is that balanced? It doesn't take a genius to know who will win more matches. Rework that A.S.A.P.

Milos1389 #30 Posted Oct 13 2018 - 15:54

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 29229 battles
  • 44
  • Member since:
    04-08-2011

The way the game is now pref mm premiums should see only the same and lower tier. My T-34-3 has no busyness against tier 9 heavies ( E-75, Mimi mouse, VK Heavy, Type 4....)

they type 59 and that tank is still easy better then T-34-3. Totally not cool! Tier 10 should stay with tier 10 and it should be only plus 1 minus 1 for the rest.

Premuim prefer mm tanks can’t see anything higher then them.

 

Just my few points. 



Jumper_170 #31 Posted Oct 13 2018 - 20:19

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 24214 battles
  • 8
  • Member since:
    12-22-2014
It's all about Tanks there is nothing about arty's ever you can buy a tank but you can't buy an arty WG has done nothing to help arty's NOTHING! if they've done anything, they made things worse for us arty's by giving all the perks to a bunch of DAT's. there it is I have said my piece. not that anyone listens or cares.

jpli #32 Posted Oct 14 2018 - 22:04

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 45460 battles
  • 600
  • [ALL] ALL
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011

Hi,

 

As of now, the updates is fine, thank you.

However, there are details that give me a problem. How should one accept to have so many regular tanks inferior to premium tanks example : (T-34-2 <T-34-3)  or tanks with a preferential matchmaker being better tanks that do not have it (59-patton/Panther mit 8,8 cm L/71 < type 59) ?

 

Any response from WG ?

 

Cheers.

 

 

 



iAmEbola #33 Posted Oct 15 2018 - 14:57

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 12477 battles
  • 7,314
  • Member since:
    02-06-2015

View PostJTM78, on Oct 11 2018 - 08:47, said:

The T-34-3 just sucks still. The 182 pen just is not enough with the long aim time, long reload, bad rng and HORRIBLE soft gun stats. It needs more love.

 

It got a 186 pen now.  You can't be afraid to run HEAT when needed (which, vs Tier IX, happens quite a bit).  It can't make a lot of money unless you run premium time as well and get a significant amount of wins.

 

I run mine with the heavys.  Almost need to because of the gun handling stats are completely unreliable at anything more than CQC zone.  The reload doesn't much allow you to wolfpack with other MTs.  Anyone that knows you just fired will jump on you and overwhelm you before you get reloaded.  

 

You have to be aggressive with it.  Get to the front of the pack where you know the other heavys will be, try to get a few spots, then let your HTs come up to support.  You'll be surprised how many you can keep at bay because they lose 390 alpha if they try to push on you.  Let your heavys continue to whittle them down while you take calculated shots of opportunity.  You'll be surprised how many kills and damage you can get.



Milos1389 #34 Posted Oct 15 2018 - 15:14

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 29229 battles
  • 44
  • Member since:
    04-08-2011

View PostiAmEbola, on Oct 15 2018 - 13:57, said:

 

It got a 186 pen now.  You can't be afraid to run HEAT when needed (which, vs Tier IX, happens quite a bit).  It can't make a lot of money unless you run premium time as well and get a significant amount of wins.

 

I run mine with the heavys.  Almost need to because of the gun handling stats are completely unreliable at anything more than CQC zone.  The reload doesn't much allow you to wolfpack with other MTs.  Anyone that knows you just fired will jump on you and overwhelm you before you get reloaded.  

 

You have to be aggressive with it.  Get to the front of the pack where you know the other heavys will be, try to get a few spots, then let your HTs come up to support.  You'll be surprised how many you can keep at bay because they lose 390 alpha if they try to push on you.  Let your heavys continue to whittle them down while you take calculated shots of opportunity.  You'll be surprised how many kills and damage you can get.

Exactly, we got premium tank with prem mm to make some money not to use HEAT. This negates the fact of premium anything.....



iAmEbola #35 Posted Oct 15 2018 - 15:38

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 12477 battles
  • 7,314
  • Member since:
    02-06-2015

View PostMilos1389, on Oct 15 2018 - 08:14, said:

Exactly, we got premium tank with prem mm to make some money not to use HEAT. This negates the fact of premium anything.....

 

Eh...I'm sure someone more in tune with the flow of battle and higher knowledge of lanes of fire could exploit firing on side and rear more to have to rarely use HEAT.  I know I'm just not there yet.  

 

It is still a decent money maker (or can be) and a great crew trainer.  So for me, that's what premium tanks are advertised as, so I'm not really disappointed.  I got exactly what I paid for.  



Milos1389 #36 Posted Oct 15 2018 - 15:43

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 29229 battles
  • 44
  • Member since:
    04-08-2011

View PostiAmEbola, on Oct 15 2018 - 14:38, said:

 

Eh...I'm sure someone more in tune with the flow of battle and higher knowledge of lanes of fire could exploit firing on side and rear more to have to rarely use HEAT.  I know I'm just not there yet.  

 

It is still a decent money maker (or can be) and a great crew trainer.  So for me, that's what premium tanks are advertised as, so I'm not really disappointed.  I got exactly what I paid for.  

 

So if you can chose between type 59 and t-34-3 which one you think is the better tank....

iAmEbola #37 Posted Oct 15 2018 - 15:46

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 12477 battles
  • 7,314
  • Member since:
    02-06-2015

View PostMilos1389, on Oct 15 2018 - 08:43, said:

So if you can chose between type 59 and t-34-3 which one you think is the better tank....

 

I don't have the Type 59, so I have no opinion on it.  I'm not sure it would be a good fit for me.  Can you give me an example tank that it plays very similar to?  

 

I will say though that the uniqueness of how the T-34-3 can be used aggressively to fight first and second line support with the Heavys is right up my alley due to how aggressive I am.   



Milos1389 #38 Posted Oct 15 2018 - 15:52

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 29229 battles
  • 44
  • Member since:
    04-08-2011

View PostiAmEbola, on Oct 15 2018 - 14:46, said:

 

I don't have the Type 59, so I have no opinion on it.  I'm not sure it would be a good fit for me.  Can you give me an example tank that it plays very similar to?  

 

I will say though that the uniqueness of how the T-34-3 can be used aggressively to fight first and second line support with the Heavys is right up my alley due to how aggressive I am.   

 

I don't have really. My point is that type 59 is just better overall than t34-3 in what those two tanks do...

 



iAmEbola #39 Posted Oct 15 2018 - 15:57

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 12477 battles
  • 7,314
  • Member since:
    02-06-2015

View PostMilos1389, on Oct 15 2018 - 08:52, said:

I don't have really. My point is that type 59 is just better overall than t34-3 in what those two tanks do...

 

How so?

 

Type 59 seems like an overall good MT, while the T-34-3 fills a niche roll.  Comparing them that way doesn't seem very fair or logical, IMHO.



Milos1389 #40 Posted Oct 15 2018 - 15:59

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 29229 battles
  • 44
  • Member since:
    04-08-2011

View PostiAmEbola, on Oct 15 2018 - 14:57, said:

 

How so?

 

Type 59 seems like an overall good MT, while the T-34-3 fills a niche roll.  Comparing them that way doesn't seem very fair or logical, IMHO.

 

Ok, lets agree to disagree then. 




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users