Jump to content


The worst mistake of WoT yet


  • Please log in to reply
35 replies to this topic

General_Greg101 #21 Posted Nov 07 2018 - 07:05

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 17230 battles
  • 698
  • Member since:
    03-20-2014
We should ask WG to allow for more customization. Maybe even have an option to put the machine gun up again...

T_Bo #22 Posted Nov 07 2018 - 16:53

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 39841 battles
  • 937
  • [REJEX] REJEX
  • Member since:
    02-10-2011

Worst mistake, for me it was grinding and purchasing the Grille-15.

 



Deputy276 #23 Posted Nov 07 2018 - 16:59

    Major

  • Players
  • 20397 battles
  • 5,973
  • [3_NZ] 3_NZ
  • Member since:
    06-17-2013
Geez...I would hate to be the guy assigned to STAND BEHIND that thing when they needed to shoot down planes or spray infantry. Talk about making a dandy target. :facepalm:

NeatoMan #24 Posted Nov 07 2018 - 16:59

    Major

  • Players
  • 28089 battles
  • 20,160
  • Member since:
    06-28-2011
Since camo values are based on tank height, they must do everything to maintain exaggerated soviet tank camo values.

Croveski #25 Posted Nov 08 2018 - 01:25

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 13183 battles
  • 82
  • [B0RT] B0RT
  • Member since:
    05-14-2011

View PostNeatoMan, on Nov 07 2018 - 09:59, said:

Since camo values are based on tank height, they must do everything to maintain exaggerated soviet tank camo values.

 

True but afaik those don't include machine guns propped up on top of various tanks in the game (or if they do then that's stupid because you can't spot a tank by just being able to see the decorative machine gun (I'm actually not sure about that tho))

leeuniverse #26 Posted Nov 08 2018 - 01:47

    Major

  • Players
  • 38646 battles
  • 7,974
  • [LAMP] LAMP
  • Member since:
    01-30-2013

IS7 will NEVER even START to be "free" again until they remove the "Derps" off of Heavy Tanks.

Among the:

 

- Physics Nerf

- Stun Nerf

- Gun Nerfs

- Speed Nerfs

 

done to this game, the "Derp Heavy's" is yet another **** you by Wargaming to its player base.



Staz211 #27 Posted Nov 08 2018 - 01:52

    Major

  • Players
  • 27045 battles
  • 3,906
  • Member since:
    06-11-2012

View PostCroveski, on Nov 07 2018 - 19:25, said:

 

True but afaik those don't include machine guns propped up on top of various tanks in the game (or if they do then that's stupid because you can't spot a tank by just being able to see the decorative machine gun (I'm actually not sure about that tho))

 

Honestly, it might include machine guns. I've spotted a few tanks where, honest to God, the only thing showing above the ridge was their machine gun. Maybe a sliver of their cupola poked up that I didn't notice, but it really seems like it was just the machine gun. 

 

Then again, vision and spotting have been borked since 1.0, so...yea, ha. 



NeatoMan #28 Posted Nov 08 2018 - 03:21

    Major

  • Players
  • 28089 battles
  • 20,160
  • Member since:
    06-28-2011

View PostCroveski, on Nov 07 2018 - 19:25, said:

True but afaik those don't include machine guns propped up on top of various tanks in the game (or if they do then that's stupid because you can't spot a tank by just being able to see the decorative machine gun (I'm actually not sure about that tho))

IIRC there was some uproar over the leopard 1 having worse camo values because of the machine gun on the turret.



EmperorJuliusCaesar #29 Posted Nov 09 2018 - 09:15

    Major

  • Players
  • 36992 battles
  • 5,702
  • [EOR] EOR
  • Member since:
    03-16-2014

View PostGeneral_Greg101, on Nov 07 2018 - 13:05, said:

We should ask WG to allow for more customization. Maybe even have an option to put the machine gun up again...

 

WG announced this was "coming soon"™...



_Steel_Casket_ #30 Posted Nov 09 2018 - 15:13

    Captain

  • Players
  • 87706 battles
  • 1,396
  • [T_U_C] T_U_C
  • Member since:
    07-09-2012
Maybe they will put the gun back on so we can shoot at some zombies!

Zeds_Tank #31 Posted Nov 09 2018 - 16:33

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 21827 battles
  • 895
  • Member since:
    02-10-2012
A button push--like for the Swedish TD travel/siege modes--extends or retracts your burp gun.

Gr8Kh4l1 #32 Posted Nov 09 2018 - 17:19

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 16196 battles
  • 334
  • Member since:
    04-03-2015

View PostThat1Villain, on Nov 05 2018 - 16:09, said:

Worst mistake was playing this game in the first place, it's like a crack addiction, you know it hurts to play but you can't stop

 

The truest words that were not a lie.



Hurk #33 Posted Nov 09 2018 - 23:05

    Major

  • Players
  • 55849 battles
  • 17,382
  • [KGR] KGR
  • Member since:
    09-30-2012

View PostNeatoMan, on Nov 07 2018 - 08:59, said:

Since camo values are based on tank height, they must do everything to maintain exaggerated soviet tank camo values.

they used to be, they changed that. now its just a balance factor. 



read_these_nikes #34 Posted Nov 09 2018 - 23:10

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 18501 battles
  • 359
  • Member since:
    02-13-2015
i guess im the only one who likes it down like it us now.

SGT_Ronson_1 #35 Posted Nov 09 2018 - 23:32

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 48909 battles
  • 806
  • [RATP] RATP
  • Member since:
    11-17-2014
are you crazy,    the devs   did not include it so that the IS7 could be stealthy.   if it had that crown on its head you could spot the gun from anywhere and the IS7 would not be able to surprise anyone

Croveski #36 Posted Nov 11 2018 - 22:57

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 13183 battles
  • 82
  • [B0RT] B0RT
  • Member since:
    05-14-2011

View PostSGT_Ronson_1, on Nov 09 2018 - 16:32, said:

are you crazy,    the devs   did not include it so that the IS7 could be stealthy.   if it had that crown on its head you could spot the gun from anywhere and the IS7 would not be able to surprise anyone

 

Afaik the machine guns on tanks aren't counted in the camo value. The gun could be 300 feet tall and it wouldn't matter, it's the hull and turret that matter




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users