133 replies to this topic

[KRZYBooP]

Howdy Boom Jockies! 

 

12Nov-26Nov The Great Railway Heist Missions Steam into game. 

 

 

Complete missions by being the top 10 base XP earner to receive 175 Bonds and 175,000 credits each day for the duration of the event. 

 

There are also top secret missions that will appear randomly for a chance to earn even more.

Keep checking out the news portal for updates on these random happenings. 

 

For more information on this event Click on the JEEF above. 

[Cowcat137]

I see where WoWs has "Le Terrible Packages" in the store.  When are you going to get us some terrible packages here?

[4TheBox]

Is win required or not?

[AppleDaD6]

4TheBox, on Nov 09 2018 - 15:10, said:

Is win required or not?

 

^This

[_Tsavo_]

Based on the information page, it states be in the top 10 in exp but does not indicate winning as a requirement.

 

https://worldoftanks...way-heist-1118/

 

2,625 space bucks to potentially be had, not bad, I s'pose.

 

 

[IndygoEEI]

[4TheBox]

_Tsavo_, on Nov 09 2018 - 15:38, said:

Based on the information page, it states be in the top 10 in exp but does not indicate winning as a requirement.

 

https://worldoftanks...way-heist-1118/

 

2,625 space bucks to potentially be had, not bad, I s'pose.

 

 

 

It has been awhile for WG that not telling or hiding a factor is not a lie for them. Not stating "win or lose" looks very suspicious to me.

If you are right, CrazyBoop should have answered my question already.

 

Edited by 4TheBox, Nov 09 2018 - 21:49.

[rockbutcher]

I appreciate the missions and will take part BUT...once again this panders to the "Momma's basement" player base who can play each and every day and not to those of us who have real lives, pay real money for pixel tanks and want more bonds but cannot spend time each day and so want to be able to grind missions when they can and this is a run-on sentence.

[KRZYBooP]

4TheBox, on Nov 09 2018 - 14:10, said:

Is win required or not?

 

4TheBox, on Nov 09 2018 - 14:48, said:

 

It has been awhile for WG that not telling or hiding a factor is not a lie for them. Not stating "win or lose" looks very suspicious to me.

If you are right, CrazyBoop should have answered my question already.

 

 

Currently looking into this, and other questions that were brought up internally. I will answer them when I receive more information on the topic. 

[xrays_]

KRZYBooP, on Nov 09 2018 - 16:10, said:

Currently looking into this, and other questions that were brought up internally. I will answer them when I receive more information on the topic. 

 

Not sure why you would have to "look into" it, as you should know before posting mission requirements.

 

x.

[__WarChild__]

xrays_, on Nov 09 2018 - 15:33, said:

 

Not sure why you would have to "look into" it, as you should know before posting mission requirements.

 

x.

 

You clearly don't know how Wargaming NA/TX works.  They get a memo from Wargaming RU and then they post it with some of their own humor/spin.  If you have questions about it, they're likely questions they have to and they submit them via email.  Due to the time zones and general RU "stuff," it takes a while to get confirmation. 

[4TheBox]

KRZYBooP, on Nov 09 2018 - 16:10, said:

 

Currently looking into this, and other questions that were brought up internally. I will answer them when I receive more information on the topic. 

Thank KRZYBooP for looking into it! Please be aware of that I have nothing against you.

However, this is a pattern I have discovered awhile ago. There is someone in your office who are omitting wining requirement intentionally to take an advantage out of it.

It is a quite smart move in short term but this kind of behavior pays its price in the long run.

 

Edited by 4TheBox, Nov 09 2018 - 23:27.

[mrmojo]

Win requirements are making any rewards harder and harder to get.

Make it top 10 for the winning side and top 7 for the losing side to at least give us the incentive to press "Battle"

[mrmojo]

4TheBox, on Nov 10 2018 - 06:24, said:

Thank KRZYBooP for looking into it! Please be aware of that I have nothing against you.

However, this is a pattern I have discovered awhile ago. There is someone in your office who are omitting wining requirement intentionally to take an advantage out of it.

It is a quite smart move in short term but this kind of behavior pays its price in the long run.

 

 

I've noticed this too. You think great, a cool mission and then see the dreaded win requirement and you realise it ain't gonna be much fun after all.

[rockbutcher]

I don't give a damn if it's a win requirement or not...in an evening of 40 games you can do that many times.  I'm pissed about the fact that all of these missions are "once per day."  This is horsepoop 'get them to sign on every day so we can expose them to our combat intelligence more!'  It's really getting to be more and more like a used car lot.

[Butknuckle]

I'm wondering if the "secret missions" that show up will do so via the grossly inefficient and oft incomprehensible mission UI. If so there is a pretty good chance I'll miss them as I've essentially stopped looking at that tab.

[NightmareMk9]

I'll be SHOCKED if there ISN'T a win requirement...

[omi5cron]

i hope there is no win requirement,but will play my normal daily allotment of matches,if it happens thats great.well i wont do the 15 matches,thats beyond my normal timeslot duration!

[BusterLoveBox]

Yep, must win it looks like. Played 1 game for the 25 bonds, then 7 more to get the 50. It broke down to 4 wins then 2 losses (I was top 3 XP every game) then the last win on my 7th game to get the bonds.

[makalu2k6]

wthI need to do total 21 games in top 10. Not the 15 in total.