Jump to content


Why is the Churchill family so bad in-game when the Churchill was historically such a successful des...

Churchill I Churchill III Churchill VII Churchill GC Black Prince

  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

Poll: The Churchill line, one of WoT's problem children (52 members have cast votes)

Are any of the Churchill tanks actually playable?

  1. Churchill I (20 votes [22.73%])

    Percentage of vote: 22.73%

  2. Churchill III (31 votes [35.23%])

    Percentage of vote: 35.23%

  3. Curchill VII (8 votes [9.09%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.09%

  4. Churchill GC (4 votes [4.55%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.55%

  5. Black Prince (14 votes [15.91%])

    Percentage of vote: 15.91%

  6. Absolutely not. (11 votes [12.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.50%

Vote Guests cannot vote Hide poll

Chaplain_5 #21 Posted Dec 03 2018 - 21:06

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 1355 battles
  • 46
  • Member since:
    03-29-2018

It's often up to people's play style. To an extent, whatever tank you find most fun/most effective under your playstyle is the best tank for you. I mean people tell me arty is OP, arty is a noob tank, only cheap noobs play arty, etc. In fact I generally dislike playing arty and make very few credits with my SPGs. I find it incredibly frustrating for a few rare moments of reward. Odd, I guess.

 

That said there are some objective problems with the Churchills. What they are is disagreed upon, but there are problems. If you like the series, all well and good, you've found ways to work around the problems and take advantage of the benefits!



Cargo_Joe #22 Posted Jan 24 2019 - 19:13

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 12365 battles
  • 104
  • Member since:
    03-06-2016

View PostStuG_Life_Ausf_G, on Nov 10 2018 - 10:19, said:

As the title says. Historically the Churchill was considered one of the better heavy tanks, but in-game they are just short of unplayable for the most part, and the Churchill I in particular is basically a handicap for your entire team even when fully upgraded. What gives, and what can one do to at least somehow make them work?

 

IT was a successful tank at what it was assigned to do; support infantry.  I have not found a lot of tank to tank action involving the Churchill.  It was successful in Tunisia against PZ III and IV tanks.  I really like the tank in the game EXCEPT that the Churchill I is unganly looking wih the hull howitzer that does not funciton AND was removed from the actual Churchill's early on.  Sad that the best Churchill is the Churchill III in the SOVIET line. Periodically you will see a Churchill III with a British or Candain flag on the side to help us remember that it was first and foremost a British tank.

pepe_trueno #23 Posted Feb 10 2019 - 06:00

    Major

  • Players
  • 41451 battles
  • 6,384
  • Member since:
    05-21-2011

View Postmworthy, on Nov 21 2018 - 19:42, said:

 

But what would the tier 7 heavy for the brits be if this were to occur, as much as i hate to see my BP move down a tier, personally it needs a pen buff considering its tier and it has similar pen to the IS

 

well there is the heavy valiant meme tank or they can go with the churchil AVRE that actualy existed be either the 290mm spigot vertion or the 300mm ardeer aggie or the 165mm L9 becouse you know WG loves adding guns on tanks that never used them or were drawings at best but wont give guns that actualy existed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Trakks #24 Posted Feb 11 2019 - 10:53

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 3363 battles
  • 175
  • Member since:
    11-24-2011
The Churchill was not made with the same design philosophy as the Tiger or the KV tanks. Those were designed with killing other tanks as a primary mission. The Churchill was designed as infantry support, not for fighting other tanks. 

SteelRonin #25 Posted Feb 22 2019 - 21:06

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 23438 battles
  • 4,886
  • [SAKAI] SAKAI
  • Member since:
    09-13-2010
The Churchills were excellents HTs for all purpose except to fight tanks

Chief_OPF #26 Posted Mar 02 2019 - 02:46

    Private

  • Players
  • 6088 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    04-09-2013

Finally unlocked Caernarvon this morning. Phew that was a dreadful grind. I can deal with the crappy everything of CH/BP but what I absolutely loathed was the speed. 3 entire tiers of slow-mo. High percentage of matches I would die by arty half way to engagement and if I managed to get there (which means we are winning lol), most of the enemy is dead and I have to scrap to get a couple shots in. Super frustrating!!

 

With full upgrades it's a little more forgiving but the speed is the real killer for CH/BP. It'll be more "playable" if nothing else, speed was bumped up 7-10 km/h. Only way to get xp is to use premium ammo. There's just no way around this. S. Conqueror better be worth all the suffering and hoping one day it'll lead to the Chieftain. 



WaywardChild #27 Posted Mar 02 2019 - 17:19

    Captain

  • Players
  • 35769 battles
  • 1,026
  • [EOR] EOR
  • Member since:
    11-27-2013
Yeah, I only liked the Church 1. You can keep the rest..... Soviet #3 is just a @#$%$#@

1lt_wert #28 Posted Mar 02 2019 - 21:10

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 29788 battles
  • 810
  • [KGR] KGR
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013

Historically, one of the Churchill's outstanding features was it's ability to handle steep slopes. It should not loose as much speed going up hill and it should be capable of navigating steeper slopes than other tanks.



Chaplain_5 #29 Posted Mar 02 2019 - 22:20

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 1355 battles
  • 46
  • Member since:
    03-29-2018
It had the ability to handle steep slopes going down and up, as well as gaps/other obstacles. It could handle them. That doesn't mean it was quick to do so. Other tanks couldn't handle them at all, much less quickly. ;) I've run the Churchill series up and especially down rough slopes that would be entirely impassable for other vehicles.

Rolkatsuki #30 Posted Mar 02 2019 - 23:15

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 15912 battles
  • 110
  • [SPCTR] SPCTR
  • Member since:
    09-03-2014
Because WoT isn't fully a historical game but one with some arcade elements.

mworthy #31 Posted Apr 14 2019 - 00:31

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 10984 battles
  • 905
  • [941ST] 941ST
  • Member since:
    05-14-2011

View PostChief_OPF, on Mar 01 2019 - 20:46, said:

Finally unlocked Caernarvon this morning. Phew that was a dreadful grind. I can deal with the crappy everything of CH/BP but what I absolutely loathed was the speed. 3 entire tiers of slow-mo. High percentage of matches I would die by arty half way to engagement and if I managed to get there (which means we are winning lol), most of the enemy is dead and I have to scrap to get a couple shots in. Super frustrating!!

 

With full upgrades it's a little more forgiving but the speed is the real killer for CH/BP. It'll be more "playable" if nothing else, speed was bumped up 7-10 km/h. Only way to get xp is to use premium ammo. There's just no way around this. S. Conqueror better be worth all the suffering and hoping one day it'll lead to the Chieftain. 

 

i'd argue the BP is decent, i liked it much better than the church 6, it really needs a pen buff though and perhaps a rof buff as well for that matter, tier 9s is generally no hope unless you get lucky, tier 8 is somewhat manageable though that depends map to map, and yes it will be worth it, i got the Conqueror, working on the tier 10, and hell its awesome, i liked the caernarvon more than my IS-3

Edited by mworthy, Apr 14 2019 - 00:35.


Exiledcrow #32 Posted Apr 14 2019 - 22:29

    Major

  • Players
  • 48237 battles
  • 2,099
  • [SABOT] SABOT
  • Member since:
    11-26-2011
The Conq and Super Conq are amazing. STILL can't bring myself to grind that line, I gave up on the Churchill I and just can't make myself go back ...




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users