Jump to content


Give back the WTE100 back


  • Please log in to reply
56 replies to this topic

23X3 #1 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 04:43

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 29680 battles
  • 10
  • [SWRA] SWRA
  • Member since:
    12-09-2012
since they kelp the foch 155 when the foch b came out why couldn't we kelp the WTE100 when the Grille came out

dominator_98 #2 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 04:51

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 21181 battles
  • 3,717
  • [NUFFS] NUFFS
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

The Foch swap happened to make the line interesting.

 

The WT swap happened because the WT was a broken tank.

 

That's why you can't still play the WT.



YANKEE137 #3 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 04:53

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 11708 battles
  • 4,401
  • [6-ACR] 6-ACR
  • Member since:
    08-17-2015
I thought it was cool looking. Too bad they can't just nerf that gun.  Either way the Grille 15 certainly solved that problem. The Russian fanboys can sleep at night again.

_Red_Saaryn_ #4 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 05:01

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 17330 battles
  • 799
  • [-IKR-] -IKR-
  • Member since:
    08-09-2015
But they gsve the wfe100 back, just that it isnt t10 nor german and nowadays goes by the name is3A

iiNSaNiiTY #5 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 05:04

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 16461 battles
  • 1,322
  • [_B-Z_] _B-Z_
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014
WTE100 was removed from the game because he is not Russian

DixonCider563 #6 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 05:08

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 37797 battles
  • 488
  • Member since:
    08-29-2012

View Postdominator_98, on Jan 10 2019 - 03:51, said:

The Foch swap happened to make the line interesting.

 

The WT swap happened because the WT was a broken tank.

 

That's why you can't still play the WT.

 

This makes zero sense, They WT may have been powerful but how it is more broken then the FV4005, or the Deathstar that they allowed to keep in game when they switched to the badger? So they removed the WT and then add a bunch more broken tanks into the game Like the Type 4 and 5. So any idea when they remove them other broken tanks???

Stormer100 #7 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 05:12

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 15187 battles
  • 331
  • [PRGY] PRGY
  • Member since:
    02-13-2014

Wasn't it readded to the chinese servers as a premium?

 

And it's still in the console version in its unnerfed state.


Edited by Stormer100, Jan 10 2019 - 05:15.


gpc_4 #8 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 05:13

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 40797 battles
  • 4,211
  • [DHO-X] DHO-X
  • Member since:
    07-06-2014

View PostDixonCider563, on Jan 10 2019 - 05:08, said:

 

This makes zero sense, They WT may have been powerful but how it is more broken then the FV4005, or the Deathstar that they allowed to keep in game when they switched to the badger? So they removed the WT and then add a bunch more broken tanks into the game Like the Type 4 and 5. So any idea when they remove them other broken tanks???

 

4005 and Deathstar are bad tanks. They can have big games but they are not OP. In fact, they have terrible win rates and are very difficult to play well. The WT could pick out any tank in the game and decide they were dead. It was terrible for the game and should never come back. 

mlinke #9 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 05:30

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 50355 battles
  • 903
  • [DD-S] DD-S
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011
Remember when I first saw a wt. I was in 62a and I know how to use my turret. I was in hull down position, guy came out, shot through my gun mantlet few times and I was dead. worst surprise ever.

Winnipeg_Jets_Fan #10 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 05:52

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 472 battles
  • 210
  • [-LHN-] -LHN-
  • Member since:
    06-05-2012

well they have a test server for a reason, then they decide having a autoloader isnt good, then they nerf then they remove it with no compensation and a easily penned lower hull and non fully rotatable turreted td is give to the masses, then they reintroduce autoloaders galore.

 

everyone with their IS3 A's are happy, maybe next year they will be replaced and all given IS-6's with no refund.

 

A bad decision removing it, they could have kept adjusting it, or given it the grill gun. what should have happened is all the XP to research the WT should have went into free xp, the crew reset and retrainable to any tank, and 6 million credits added to your account.  Not give everyone a TD they never ground for.



Asassian7 #11 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 06:02

    Major

  • Players
  • 25213 battles
  • 11,743
  • [YOUJO] YOUJO
  • Member since:
    12-26-2011
No. That tank could die in a fire. It deserves its fate in the pit of hell where broken tanks go.

It was unbalanceable. Completely. It was a one trick pony. It peeke out, it clipped one tank out from full health, it got HE spammed to death. What awful, stale, stupid gameplay.

IndignantMapleBacon #12 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 06:13

    Major

  • Players
  • 25132 battles
  • 2,410
  • Member since:
    04-20-2013
whats everybody's take on the IS-3A then, is it truly OP? 

airsoft_man #13 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 07:10

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 16124 battles
  • 356
  • [REL-A] REL-A
  • Member since:
    10-26-2015
Honestly, in today's meta I don't think the WT AUF E100 would be that op. 

Avalon304 #14 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 07:20

    Major

  • Players
  • 20778 battles
  • 8,867
  • [BRVE] BRVE
  • Member since:
    09-04-2012

View PostDixonCider563, on Jan 09 2019 - 21:08, said:

 

This makes zero sense, They WT may have been powerful but how it is more broken then the FV4005, or the Deathstar that they allowed to keep in game when they switched to the badger? So they removed the WT and then add a bunch more broken tanks into the game Like the Type 4 and 5. So any idea when they remove them other broken tanks???

 

The FVs cant just delete a Maus from the battlefield. A WT E100 could. FVs arent likely to pen you with their HESH unless youve given them a really clean shot. A WT E 100s gun was good enough to pen you 5 times in quick succession.

 

Yes the Type 4 and 5 are broken. Thats not an excuse to readd another broken tank.



DeathComesForU #15 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 07:42

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 10957 battles
  • 58
  • [EOR] EOR
  • Member since:
    06-29-2013

>WT exists

>WT too stronk

>Nerf WT

>Still too stronk

>Remove WT

...

>Bring back WT?

 

I don't get what part of WT was too OP you don't understand. The Foch wasnt OP so obviously people got to keep it. The Death Star is the idol in the game and engraved so far into WoTs history it would have caused an outrage if removed. 

 

But if you are upsetti about WG removing your OP tank and not giving it back to you in reward tank form. Boo hoo. 



tigerhunterz #16 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 07:58

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 40657 battles
  • 171
  • [ICON-] ICON-
  • Member since:
    04-03-2013
Yeah bring it back but this time give us a 10 round clip

kapri25 #17 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 09:33

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 14905 battles
  • 725
  • [13A] 13A
  • Member since:
    03-21-2014

View PostIndignantMapleBacon, on Jan 10 2019 - 00:13, said:

whats everybody's take on the IS-3A then, is it truly OP? 

 

It's not. If you have a platoon or more of them then yes. But alone, no. It's a weaker version of the defender...just with an autoloader gun. It can be OP against people who make mistakes (like me:confused:) at times or those who have no clue what that tube thing is sticking out of the top of your turret.

_Red_Saaryn_ #18 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 10:10

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 17330 battles
  • 799
  • [-IKR-] -IKR-
  • Member since:
    08-09-2015
But you all already have the wte100 back. Just is that it isnt german anymore but russian and neither t10 but tier 8. Nowadays is called is3A.

24cups #19 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 16:07

    Major

  • Players
  • 23301 battles
  • 3,032
  • [D-DAY] D-DAY
  • Member since:
    01-25-2013

View PostDeathComesForU, on Jan 10 2019 - 01:42, said:

>WT exists

>WT too stronk

>Nerf WT

>Still too stronk

>Remove WT

...

>Bring back WT?

 

I don't get what part of WT was too OP you don't understand. The Foch wasnt OP so obviously people got to keep it. The Death Star is the idol in the game and engraved so far into WoTs history it would have caused an outrage if removed. 

 

But if you are upsetti about WG removing your OP tank and not giving it back to you in reward tank form. Boo hoo. 

Actually the original Deathstar was the Jageroo. It's still here. The British one wasn't even here that long, so not really "engraved in WoT history ".



Kerosedge #20 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 18:05

    Captain

  • Players
  • 21067 battles
  • 1,308
  • [CRIMZ] CRIMZ
  • Member since:
    05-05-2013
Give it a 3 round clip and put it back in. So many broken tanks now, need something to keep those Type5s in check.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users