Jump to content


Give back the WTE100 back


  • Please log in to reply
50 replies to this topic

kuxan #41 Posted Jan 11 2019 - 23:55

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 52559 battles
  • 474
  • [PL1AD] PL1AD
  • Member since:
    06-17-2011

To be honest since we have so many broken autoloaders in the game i don't  think it will hurt the game much if they brought back a nerfed version of the Waffle. 

Something like this maybe.

---4 shots 440 damage 

--- 5 seconds between shots 

--- 3 seconds aim time

--- 38 seconds reload.

 



AnT1BiOt1C #42 Posted Jan 11 2019 - 23:58

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 24847 battles
  • 517
  • [STD-] STD-
  • Member since:
    07-23-2013

View PostPela46, on Jan 11 2019 - 07:50, said:

Siiii que lo devuelvan, el tiempo que perdi en conseguirlo, es mi tiempo y no de uds WG,  si yo me tome la molestia de conseguirlo, quiero que me lo devuelvan y lps llorones que hagan lo mismo..  Pero esto es comun que WG se cague en los jugadores

 

........

AnT1BiOt1C #43 Posted Jan 12 2019 - 00:05

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 24847 battles
  • 517
  • [STD-] STD-
  • Member since:
    07-23-2013
I would definitely like it back.  I didn't free XP it, I ground it out and it does annoy me that every other tank they seemingly replace, people get to keep and also get the T10 replacement.  I got stuck with the Grille.....and did not keep the Waffle.

Edited by AnT1BiOt1C, Jan 12 2019 - 00:06.


Heldar #44 Posted Jan 13 2019 - 04:56

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 32113 battles
  • 58
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    03-06-2012

View PostFlarvin, on Jan 11 2019 - 16:40, said:

 

Sorry, that the actual data does not match how you feel. 

 

If youre gonna say someone is wrong, make sure they are.  WTF100 had a 5 round magazine @ 490 damage per round.  that gives you an average clip potential of 2450.   Thats enough in 1 clip to take out over half of the tier 10 tanks in the game, excluding some heavies, and enough for every tier 9 and below, and that clip size was the nerfed version.  It originally had 6 rounds..  The tank was broken.  It should stay gone.

Edited by Heldar, Jan 13 2019 - 05:00.


Firemoth #45 Posted Jan 13 2019 - 05:15

    Major

  • Players
  • 37363 battles
  • 4,040
  • Member since:
    05-21-2011

View PostHeldar, on Jan 13 2019 - 13:56, said:

 

If youre gonna say someone is wrong, make sure they are.  WTF100 had a 5 round magazine @ 490 560 damage per round.  that gives you an average clip potential of 2450 2800.   Thats enough in 1 clip to take out over half of the tier 10 tanks in the game, excluding some heavies, and enough for every tier 9 and below, and that clip size was the nerfed version.  It originally had 6 rounds..  The tank was broken.  It should stay gone.

same gun as the JT, the long 12.8.

 



Heldar #46 Posted Jan 13 2019 - 09:41

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 32113 battles
  • 58
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    03-06-2012

View PostFiremoth, on Jan 12 2019 - 22:15, said:

same gun as the JT, the long 12.8.

 

 

my bad.  I was going off current tanks.gg stats.  560 damage proves my point further.

The_Next_Penetration #47 Posted Jan 13 2019 - 11:41

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 45542 battles
  • 309
  • [DD214] DD214
  • Member since:
    08-24-2013
I don't want the WT back but it's hard to argue they took it out because it was OP when you have tanks like the Type 5, Obj 430u, and Super Conq in the game. At the least the WT had a weak spot

AdmrHackett #48 Posted Jan 13 2019 - 13:30

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 3933 battles
  • 176
  • Member since:
    10-21-2013

View Postkapri25, on Jan 10 2019 - 08:33, said:

 

It's not. If you have a platoon or more of them then yes. But alone, no. It's a weaker version of the defender...just with an autoloader gun. It can be OP against people who make mistakes (like me:confused:) at times or those who have no clue what that tube thing is sticking out of the top of your turret.

 

Weaker then a Defender maybe, but far stronger than a regular IS-3. Just because it’s not as OP as the other OP tier 8 Russian heavy doesn’t mean it’s not OP.

Heldar #49 Posted Yesterday, 09:34 AM

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 32113 battles
  • 58
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    03-06-2012

View PostThe_Next_Penetration, on Jan 13 2019 - 04:41, said:

I don't want the WT back but it's hard to argue they took it out because it was OP when you have tanks like the Type 5, Obj 430u, and Super Conq in the game. At the least the WT had a weak spot

 

There is a difference though.  While i agree that all the tanks you listed are indeed OP to a degree (and some points are debatable, but all three punch above their weight classes - type 5 being the worst offender IMO), none of those three can delete any 1 tank who IS shooting at their weakspots reliably, within seconds of the engagement starting.  The wthcould.  Consistently.

Edited by Heldar, Yesterday, 09:34 AM.


24cups #50 Posted Yesterday, 06:08 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 23292 battles
  • 2,981
  • [D-DAY] D-DAY
  • Member since:
    01-25-2013

View PostHeldar, on Jan 15 2019 - 03:34, said:

 

There is a difference though.  While i agree that all the tanks you listed are indeed OP to a degree (and some points are debatable, but all three punch above their weight classes - type 5 being the worst offender IMO), none of those three can delete any 1 tank who IS shooting at their weakspots reliably, within seconds of the engagement starting.  The wthcould.  Consistently.

And RNGesus help you if you ran into a platoon of them. 



Bill_Nye_the_RussianSpy #51 Posted Yesterday, 11:05 PM

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 24073 battles
  • 2,030
  • Member since:
    03-30-2015
No way




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users