Jump to content


Give back the WTE100 back


  • Please log in to reply
59 replies to this topic

Anublister #21 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 18:06

    Captain

  • Players
  • 68702 battles
  • 1,045
  • [--T--] --T--
  • Member since:
    05-26-2013
No.

jamesdoz #22 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 23:28

    Major

  • Players
  • 39093 battles
  • 3,383
  • [AMOX] AMOX
  • Member since:
    05-08-2012
I think the prob;em is the WT is what WG did when they took it away, They should have given everyone who had it a choice, get your exp and credits back crew retrained to any tank in the tree or take the new td, Because many many people spent real money to free exp to the WTe100,  I just wish we had a choice, But yes it should not come back it was OP, the only way it could or should come back is if it has a 3 round clip, or something like that.

StepChild_TO #23 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 23:40

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 36122 battles
  • 447
  • Member since:
    05-30-2011

All "op" tds are removed or nerfed due to one group of special whiners here in this game. The Russian med mafia. When I had the tier 10 patton and I could pen a ru meds turret, they nerfed the gun. When I worked my fingers off to get the wote100 and started to assassinate all the meds, who had, and still have, 5 sec reloads and insane accuracy, nerf then removed. When I got he fv215b183, guess what? Yeah all those stat padders who have 4k or more battles in their tier 10 ru meds started to cry, YET again, and wham: gun nerfed. Will they ever nerf a Russian med? NOT A CHANCE. Unless its the t-22, which they almost all cheated to get anyways.

Yeah, so hear me on this.



Heldar #24 Posted Jan 10 2019 - 23:41

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 33584 battles
  • 109
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    03-06-2012
No.  Its broken.  The only way it COULD come back is if it was heavily nerfed.  Then all you [edited]will complain that its not the same anymore.

dominator_98 #25 Posted Jan 11 2019 - 00:21

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 22956 battles
  • 3,841
  • [PUBBY] PUBBY
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

View PostDixonCider563, on Jan 09 2019 - 22:08, said:

 

This makes zero sense, They WT may have been powerful but how it is more broken then the FV4005, or the Deathstar that they allowed to keep in game when they switched to the badger? So they removed the WT and then add a bunch more broken tanks into the game Like the Type 4 and 5. So any idea when they remove them other broken tanks???

 

1. Take what progress we can get. I'd remove any gun that can kill a full hp same tier tank in under 8 seconds, as well as ammorack detonations (and arty, in an ideal world).

2. Being able to clip out a Maus with relative ease was more broken than the 4005.



leeuniverse #26 Posted Jan 11 2019 - 02:06

    Major

  • Players
  • 38646 battles
  • 7,975
  • [LAMP] LAMP
  • Member since:
    01-30-2013

1. The "WT" is the T9 Tank....  The T10 was the WAFFLE.  Proper terminology is important.

 

2. I really wish people would stop saying the IS3A is "op" or even more laughable the new Waffle.

The IS3A is massive trash...  First the IS3 hasn't been good in a long time, the 3A is worse in every way save having an auto-loader.

But the auto-loader doesn't mean crap when you're slow as donkey crap and have no armor.

 

The tank only does "as good" as the IS3 when top tier, thus that makes the tank isn't even close to being "good" let alone "op".



D1rkjr #27 Posted Jan 11 2019 - 02:16

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 22189 battles
  • 415
  • Member since:
    11-26-2012
If you think WT E-100 was bad... consider the fact the real life FV 4005 was an autoloader... 

CardboardJedi #28 Posted Jan 11 2019 - 03:04

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 13217 battles
  • 690
  • [DDVR] DDVR
  • Member since:
    02-19-2012

View Postmlinke, on Jan 09 2019 - 23:30, said:

Remember when I first saw a wt. I was in 62a and I know how to use my turret. I was in hull down position, guy came out, shot through my gun mantlet few times and I was dead. worst surprise ever.

 

i just ran into a foch B the other night in my T95, even did "the wiggle" and he penned every shot, sent me packing. but this is different, right?

Flarvin #29 Posted Jan 11 2019 - 03:15

    Major

  • Players
  • 54273 battles
  • 16,123
  • Member since:
    03-29-2013

View PostHeldar, on Jan 10 2019 - 17:41, said:

No.  Its broken.  The only way it COULD come back is if it was heavily nerfed.  

 

Heavily nerfed? Why?

 

Based on its tank curve graph, it was far from OP. 

 

I loved going against them. They were huge and easily spotted. Basically no armor, so you could HE them. 

 

The only time I saw them played well, was with a platoon of good players. So they could reload protected.



Heldar #30 Posted Jan 11 2019 - 04:58

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 33584 battles
  • 109
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    03-06-2012

View PostFlarvin, on Jan 10 2019 - 20:15, said:

 

Heavily nerfed? Why?

 

Based on its tank curve graph, it was far from OP. 

 

I loved going against them. They were huge and easily spotted. Basically no armor, so you could HE them. 

 

The only time I saw them played well, was with a platoon of good players. So they could reload protected.

 

Youre right.  A tank that can clip out a tier 10 from full hp in a few seconds isnt op.

rivercushion #31 Posted Jan 11 2019 - 14:44

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 6334 battles
  • 24
  • Member since:
    10-21-2017
+1 Would like to see the WT Auf E100 in its un-nerfed state.

Pela46 #32 Posted Jan 11 2019 - 15:50

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 56024 battles
  • 85
  • [NOB] NOB
  • Member since:
    03-26-2014

View Post23X3, on Jan 10 2019 - 03:43, said:

since they kelp the foch 155 when the foch b came out why couldn't we kelp the WTE100 when the Grille came out

Siiii que lo devuelvan, el tiempo que perdi en conseguirlo, es mi tiempo y no de uds WG,  si yo me tome la molestia de conseguirlo, quiero que me lo devuelvan y lps llorones que hagan lo mismo..  Pero esto es comun que WG se cague en los jugadores



Colonel_Lonewolf #33 Posted Jan 11 2019 - 16:50

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 33494 battles
  • 116
  • Member since:
    01-02-2013

I would like my Waffle back, please.

 



24cups #34 Posted Jan 11 2019 - 17:24

    Major

  • Players
  • 24369 battles
  • 4,060
  • [D-DAY] D-DAY
  • Member since:
    01-25-2013

View PostColonel_Lonewolf, on Jan 11 2019 - 10:50, said:

I would like my Waffle back, please.

 

Leggo my Eggo. 



Trauglodyte #35 Posted Jan 11 2019 - 17:35

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 22577 battles
  • 3,549
  • [GSH] GSH
  • Member since:
    06-04-2016

View PostAsassian7, on Jan 10 2019 - 06:02, said:

No. That tank could die in a fire. It deserves its fate in the pit of hell where broken tanks go.

It was unbalanceable. Completely. It was a one trick pony. It peeke out, it clipped one tank out from full health, it got HE spammed to death. What awful, stale, stupid gameplay.

 

I emphasized the one part that made the WT E 100 broken.  It WAS broken at that time in that gaming environment.  IF it were just being introduced to the game, given the landscape of the game, do you think that they'd make the same mistake?  Case in point, would THIS be considered OP/broken:

 

128 mm

 

Damage:  490

Penetration:  246 mm

Reload:  24.06/20.06/16.04/12.34

Clip Size:  4

Clip Damage:  1,960 / 12 seconds

Intra-Clip Reload:  3.7 seconds

 

150 mm

 

Damage:  750

Penetration:  279 mm (APCR as base)

Reload:  25.52/21.27/17.02

Clip Size:  3

Clip Damage:  2,250/15.9 seconds

Intra-Clip Reload:  5.3 seconds

 

In both of those cases, you're getting a worse WT Pz. IV/Jagdtiger/Grille 15 with a clip.  So, in today's setting with that setup, WOULD it still be broken/OP, let alone bad for the game?

 

View PostCardboardJedi, on Jan 11 2019 - 03:04, said:

 

i just ran into a foch B the other night in my T95, even did "the wiggle" and he penned every shot, sent me packing. but this is different, right?

 

The T95 doesn't wiggle and, even if you did, that doesn't mean that hitting your topside tumors is difficult.  Anyway, there is a major difference between getting hit by up to 6 rounds from the Foch B for 400 per and getting hit for up to 4 times in under 6 seconds for 750 per shot.



Cruiser133 #36 Posted Jan 11 2019 - 20:07

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 34997 battles
  • 553
  • Member since:
    05-28-2013
I had a waffle and had no issues playing against them, even the unnerfed ones. At least you had a chance to get away and return fire unlike the current sh1tbarn and deathstar. One shot and poof. I took out a batchat 25t the other day in my 183 that way, dude was not happy.

I_QQ_4_U #37 Posted Jan 11 2019 - 20:15

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 22188 battles
  • 6,490
  • Member since:
    10-17-2016

View PostCardboardJedi, on Jan 11 2019 - 03:04, said:

 

i just ran into a foch B the other night in my T95, even did "the wiggle" and he penned every shot, sent me packing. but this is different, right?

 

And he probably sent it in to one of the Youtubers as a miracle game.

leeuniverse #38 Posted Jan 11 2019 - 21:29

    Major

  • Players
  • 38646 battles
  • 7,975
  • [LAMP] LAMP
  • Member since:
    01-30-2013

I would just at least want my T10 Tank to have a ***** TURRET....!!!

 

Pisses me off that they would screw us that way, with their "limited radius" turret which makes the tank "unplayable" for me (i.e. I want to enjoy playing tanks, not have to deal with **** ).



Astralite #39 Posted Jan 11 2019 - 21:37

    Captain

  • Players
  • 25648 battles
  • 1,554
  • Member since:
    12-24-2013
Put it back in, its not like it won't be completely balanced by the 3,257 Type 5's running around. 

Flarvin #40 Posted Jan 11 2019 - 23:40

    Major

  • Players
  • 54273 battles
  • 16,123
  • Member since:
    03-29-2013

View PostHeldar, on Jan 10 2019 - 22:58, said:

Youre right.  A tank that can clip out a tier 10 from full hp in a few seconds isnt op.

 

Sorry, that the actual data does not match how you feel. 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users