Jump to content


Thanks for adding "numbers" to the customization option


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

SteelRonin #1 Posted Feb 07 2019 - 17:10

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 23164 battles
  • 4,695
  • [SAKAI] SAKAI
  • Member since:
    09-13-2010

Yes, thanks, another step forward in the customization area, but is not enough.

 

You can still profit a lot more if you add more camos, better patterns, historical ones, custom tools like fuel tanks, and camo nets (no additional camo values).

 

Heading to historical and realistic customization is far better than having a football field camo in the tank, imho.

 

As a customer, I don't mind spending 2k gold to paint my favorite tank the way I want, adding the number according to the batallion I want to represent, adding the "political allowed" symbols where they should be, and using the most historical camo pattern possible.

 

Preset camos don't allow you to put numbers so, WG, be smart here, and again, you can profit more with less preset camos and more individual customization.

 

best regards

 

 



Sturm_Teufel #2 Posted Feb 07 2019 - 17:14

    Major

  • Players
  • 45836 battles
  • 3,781
  • [-P-] -P-
  • Member since:
    07-22-2011

I just want to put a great, big, 13 on my German vehicles. Is that so bad?

:trollface:


Edited by Sturm_Teufel, Feb 07 2019 - 17:14.


motoracedave #3 Posted Feb 07 2019 - 17:18

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 18708 battles
  • 953
  • [HSOLO] HSOLO
  • Member since:
    05-21-2013
3-5-7 seems more appropriate. 

Sturm_Teufel #4 Posted Feb 07 2019 - 17:27

    Major

  • Players
  • 45836 battles
  • 3,781
  • [-P-] -P-
  • Member since:
    07-22-2011

View Postmotoracedave, on Feb 07 2019 - 08:18, said:

3-5-7 seems more appropriate. 

 

Lol, 3-5-7, just like the "cake" in Portal.:teethhappy:

StoveBolt54 #5 Posted Feb 07 2019 - 18:05

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 26543 battles
  • 1,002
  • Member since:
    09-17-2013

View Postmotoracedave, on Feb 07 2019 - 09:18, said:

3-5-7 seems more appropriate. 

 

357 works but 666 doesn't.

 

Darn it all. I'll keep my gold then.

 

:P



mlinke #6 Posted Feb 07 2019 - 18:45

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 50736 battles
  • 967
  • [DD-S] DD-S
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011
I want haken kreuz on my tanks.

GeorgePreddy #7 Posted Feb 07 2019 - 19:18

    Major

  • Players
  • 14345 battles
  • 11,197
  • Member since:
    04-11-2013

I've already applied "747" to both sides of my T-34-85M turret.

 

Of the more than 100 types of aircraft I flew during my 42 year professional pilot career... the 747 was by far my favorite.

 

 

 

 

 

 



Dragon6actual #8 Posted Feb 07 2019 - 21:25

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 14627 battles
  • 40
  • [PRIC] PRIC
  • Member since:
    03-01-2011
I like but you can really only put the "turret" number of one side of most Tiger's I and II

stevezaxx #9 Posted Feb 08 2019 - 00:46

    Captain

  • Players
  • 39010 battles
  • 1,076
  • [COD] COD
  • Member since:
    08-02-2011

View PostStoveBolt54, on Feb 07 2019 - 12:05, said:

 

357 works but 666 doesn't.

 

Darn it all. I'll keep my gold then.

 

:P

 

you cant put 666 or 420 or 088... by no means have i checked ALL the other numbers.... but those three at least, are banned

64sherman #10 Posted Feb 08 2019 - 01:05

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 26532 battles
  • 604
  • [MOZZY] MOZZY
  • Member since:
    03-21-2013

View Poststevezaxx, on Feb 07 2019 - 17:46, said:

 

you cant put 666 or 420 or 088... by no means have i checked ALL the other numbers.... but those three at least, are banned

 

How bout 69? 

Edited by 64sherman, Feb 08 2019 - 01:05.


stevezaxx #11 Posted Feb 10 2019 - 06:19

    Captain

  • Players
  • 39010 battles
  • 1,076
  • [COD] COD
  • Member since:
    08-02-2011

View Post64sherman, on Feb 07 2019 - 19:05, said:

 

How bout 69? 

 

069 is allowed. All two-digit numbers are dissallowed

 

014 is not allowed. Why, you say? Perhaps from this thread:

http://forum.worldof...-tanks/#topmost






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users