Jump to content


Premium ammo for bonds instead of gold or credits?

Premium ammo Special ammo bonds

  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

The_Iron_Bullet #1 Posted Feb 10 2019 - 23:18

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 19683 battles
  • 603
  • [WONKA] WONKA
  • Member since:
    08-28-2014

What if premium ammo cost bonds instead of gold or silver? That way everyone technically has the same advantage since you can't buy bonds, only earn them playing the game. This will create a greater bond sink making them more valuable to everyone. Also it will entice more people to do tournaments and CW to earn more bonds. But you also need to price ammo to bonds, so maybe 1 bond for 3 or 5 shells? Or make it RoF dependent so lets say a T62A's premium ammo cost is 1 bond for 5 shells while the Jg.Pz E100's premium ammo will cost 1 bond for 2 shells.

 

What do you guys think?



FrozenKemp #2 Posted Feb 10 2019 - 23:27

    Major

  • Players
  • 53380 battles
  • 9,837
  • [8ARMY] 8ARMY
  • Member since:
    04-24-2011

Oh god no.

 

This would basically take things back to square 1, when premium ammunition was so expensive that it was basically only available to those with a reliable gold income, i.e. those doing well in Clan Wars. 



Echo_Saber #3 Posted Feb 10 2019 - 23:45

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 22164 battles
  • 2,555
  • [NEET] NEET
  • Member since:
    03-17-2015
Sometimes I think that it wouldn't even be possible to have worse ideas about balance than wargaming, but then I go on the forums and get reminded that no, there are definitely worse ideas out there.

The_Iron_Bullet #4 Posted Feb 10 2019 - 23:45

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 19683 battles
  • 603
  • [WONKA] WONKA
  • Member since:
    08-28-2014

View PostFrozenKemp, on Feb 10 2019 - 17:27, said:

Oh god no.

 

This would basically take things back to square 1, when premium ammunition was so expensive that it was basically only available to those with a reliable gold income, i.e. those doing well in Clan Wars. 

 

Yes but back then it was p2w, and it still is. With bonds there is no p2w. This could also give WG a reason to bring back tier 6 and 8 CW. 

The_Iron_Bullet #5 Posted Feb 10 2019 - 23:47

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 19683 battles
  • 603
  • [WONKA] WONKA
  • Member since:
    08-28-2014

View PostEcho_Saber, on Feb 10 2019 - 17:45, said:

Sometimes I think that it wouldn't even be possible to have worse ideas about balance than wargaming, but then I go on the forums and get reminded that no, there are definitely worse ideas out there.

 

Why? Can you please explain?

Garandster #6 Posted Feb 10 2019 - 23:51

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 6134 battles
  • 1,232
  • Member since:
    04-12-2018
It's a terrible idea that will leave people screaming about how it makes the good players better and is P2W.

Heat_Stroke #7 Posted Feb 15 2019 - 16:29

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 30614 battles
  • 259
  • Member since:
    02-16-2014
Although they are trying to make the game fun so people will play it, the ultimate goal is to sell you something. Even more so if they can sell it to you over, and over, and over.





Also tagged with Premium ammo, Special ammo, bonds

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users