Urabouttudie, on Apr 22 2019 - 19:54, said:
What would be the point? I got my answer, I'm sorry you're still searching for yours but they've changed the MM...regardless whether I ever had anything to do with it [pure speculation of course]...the fact remains, they've changed it. I can no longer replicate results with the current MM because they changed the very aspect of the MM that governed what I was doing.
Piss off...go log thousands of your own battles if you want to find answers. Do your own damned testing and research rather than sit around the forums passive-aggressively demanding someone convince you you're wrong. I'm not here to convince you, Neato or anyone else taking up this argument although you all seem to love demanding proof.
Why do I need you or anyone else to "vette my data"? Do you think I collected it all for your benefit...or mine? Hmmm? ...and really...are you so naive as to accept my data if I did post it? How would you ever know if I fabricated it all or not now?
Nice try...now go do your own damned homework.
UrA
This from a guy who thinks the game is trash, plays, complains and invokes RIDICULOUS arguments based on data that he won't share.
Sounds totally legit.
I don't need to 'do my own damned homework' I am satisfied based on my own observations, some research and reading of the research of others to be QUITE COMFORTABLE that the Random MM is exactly that -- Random -- inasmuch that there is no 'predilection' by MM to "choose" based on some insidious and purposeful intent to 'screw' players over. I've seen absolutely NO INDICATION in any of all of that to lead me to wear the same Foil Covered Outfit you sport.
So, again, put up, provide SOLID evidence based information that supports your claims that can be vetted by others or recognize that your lunacy is showing and you expose yourself to ridicule for being ridiculous.
OvO