Jump to content


WoT Tier Analysis - Week 20

Stats

  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

NeatoMan #21 Posted May 22 2019 - 12:15

    Major

  • Players
  • 28180 battles
  • 20,578
  • Member since:
    06-28-2011

View PostMfezi, on May 20 2019 - 19:58, said:

You must be joking Neato! - use my stats then stab me in the back?. Get your own friggin numbers!

hmmm...  the only time I had to use your data to counter something has been against bikebudha/JohnnyReroll/Sotrue/SimplyPz.  :confused:



RacWisco #22 Posted May 22 2019 - 15:00

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 75094 battles
  • 915
  • [MOOBS] MOOBS
  • Member since:
    09-19-2011
I didn't think it was possible to not have at least one winning tank until now.

Bavor #23 Posted May 31 2019 - 16:54

    Major

  • Players
  • 34081 battles
  • 3,201
  • [REL-A] REL-A
  • Member since:
    04-21-2013

View PostMfezi, on May 21 2019 - 18:02, said:

Maybe Bavor would like to explain the difference between tank tier and battle tier and why he thinks that time of day is relevent?

 

Different tiers have different occurrences of top, middle, and bottom tier.  Also due to server population changes through the day, the time of day is relevant because at different times of day different tiers have different occurrences of top, middle, and bottom tier.  That's why that data is relevant.  "relevent. Adjective. Common misspelling of relevant."

 

In addition to that, tank type is also relevant.  Also, regular vs pref matchmaking tanks need to be sorted differently.  They won't get "bottom tier" battles and just be top tier or middle tier.



Bavor #24 Posted May 31 2019 - 16:57

    Major

  • Players
  • 34081 battles
  • 3,201
  • [REL-A] REL-A
  • Member since:
    04-21-2013

View PostMfezi, on May 20 2019 - 18:47, said:

 

Please point me to this alternative data source or give me some examples so that I can verify my results, I await your response with bated breath!.... :)

 



FastForward7 #25 Posted May 31 2019 - 17:10

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 11619 battles
  • 511
  • Member since:
    03-31-2011

View PostBavor, on May 31 2019 - 07:57, said:

 

 

I'm sorry, but that's such a lazy response. If you assert something, the burden is on you to provide a source to back up your claims.

Bavor #26 Posted Jun 01 2019 - 01:44

    Major

  • Players
  • 34081 battles
  • 3,201
  • [REL-A] REL-A
  • Member since:
    04-21-2013

View PostFastForward7, on May 31 2019 - 11:10, said:

I'm sorry, but that's such a lazy response. If you assert something, the burden is on you to provide a source to back up your claims.

 

I'm tired of spoon feeding easily researched information to people too lazy to find it on their own.  I found it so others can too if they bother to look.  

 

I don't need to prove anything.  This is an internet game forum not a courtroom.  If you actually searched the forums you would have noticed that NeatoMan, some other players, and I have made multiple posts about data collected from thousands of pub battles about matchmaking, battle results, tank tier battle information, etc... and other information.  Its not hard to find.  

 

Its the same on the WoT Facebook groups.  So many players will nag other people for information they can find in 15 seconds on the WoT web page or in under 30 seconds in a google search.  Instead they will make multiple posts and off topic replies nagging people for information they can very easily find on their own.  







Also tagged with Stats

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users