Jump to content


Issue with tonights 2v2 (6/14)


  • Please log in to reply
43 replies to this topic

Ridikyool #41 Posted Jun 19 2019 - 20:23

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 22759 battles
  • 85
  • [RDDT] RDDT
  • Member since:
    07-24-2011

You people are so petty. Sometimes things don't work out. There are 4 of these tournaments every weekend. The fact that one had an issue...which at most took away an hour of your time is not a big deal. You still got some rewards, hopefully had fun playing and compensation which extends much longer than the hour. Chill out.

 

If you don't like the compensation, tough! You don't get to decide what your compensation is. Hell WargamingNA does't even get to, this all requires approval from the home office.You can provide feedback and say that you don't like the compensation and would have preferred XYZ instead, but you certainly aren't owed anything. This sense of entitlement is beyond silly. 

 



yruputin #42 Posted Jun 19 2019 - 21:50

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 29932 battles
  • 448
  • [A_P] A_P
  • Member since:
    03-08-2016

View Post1984BigBrother, on Jun 18 2019 - 14:46, said:

Hello,

 

I will explain a little better what happened. The tournament system recently had an update that caused an unforeseen issue that prevented the data from some matches from being counted the issue has since been corrected. We attempted to find the data from these matches but were unsuccessful.

 

So here is what we are going to do:

 

  • Every match that failed will manually be set to 0 points for both teams.
  • We will process the normal payout with these results.
  • Every player that was on a team that had at least 1 battle fail will also be compensated 7 days of premium time. This is because we can not tell if those were victories or losses and some players may get a lower place do to this.


Compensation has been approved and is waiting to be processed, this can take up to 2 weeks but usually gets processed much quicker.

 

Thanks, 

 

Big

 

 

could have unlocked more tanks w the higher exp. exchange. . no sorry i am not satisfied but also not disillusioned. seems to be wg wot mo:facepalm:bloody bull balls:facepalm:

 


Edited by yruputin, Jun 19 2019 - 21:54.


yruputin #43 Posted Jun 19 2019 - 21:53

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 29932 battles
  • 448
  • [A_P] A_P
  • Member since:
    03-08-2016
no . i won't be disillusioned by thinking wg would make good on the fact that i could have used the gold to exc. for more xp at a reasonable rate. bloody bull balls:facepalm:

Vevrain #44 Posted Jun 21 2019 - 19:22

    Corporal

  • Beta Testers
  • 19664 battles
  • 16
  • [DYNO] DYNO
  • Member since:
    04-01-2011

View PostRidikyool, on Jun 19 2019 - 13:23, said:

You people are so petty. Sometimes things don't work out. There are 4 of these tournaments every weekend. The fact that one had an issue...which at most took away an hour of your time is not a big deal. You still got some rewards, hopefully had fun playing and compensation which extends much longer than the hour. Chill out.

 

If you don't like the compensation, tough! You don't get to decide what your compensation is. Hell WargamingNA does't even get to, this all requires approval from the home office.You can provide feedback and say that you don't like the compensation and would have preferred XYZ instead, but you certainly aren't owed anything. This sense of entitlement is beyond silly. 

 

There's been like, 1 person who has displayed a sense of entitlement, the rest are people pretty calmly providing feedback.
WG has a PR team of people paid to play defence, they don't need you to condescend to us for free.

Additionally, the week of prem time has started automatically, so if someone is unable to log in for the next week, they won't actually see use of the "compensation". If they also got knocked down enough places in the tournament, they won't have gotten a placement reward either.


Edited by Vevrain, Jun 21 2019 - 21:31.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users