Jump to content


German Twin-Barrel Tank Destroyer tech-tree suggestion!

TechTree Suggestion German TD TankDestroyer Poll

  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

Poll: German Twin-Barrel Tank Destroyer tech-tree suggestion! (15 members have cast votes)

How was the suggestion?

  1. Great, these tanks look exciting to play. (6 votes [40.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 40.00%

  2. Good, but like all things, it needs to be tweaked for balance. (1 vote [6.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.67%

  3. Bad, why more tank destroyers? try another class and ask again. (1 vote [6.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.67%

  4. Awful, I think these things would be unhealthy for the game in all aspects. (7 votes [46.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 46.67%

Do you think anything is too strong about these tanks?

  1. Yes, the gun. (6 votes [40.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 40.00%

  2. Yes, the speed. (1 vote [6.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.67%

  3. Yes, the weight/armor.. (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. Not really... (8 votes [53.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 53.33%

How good should the camo values be from STRV(23) to 4005(1.37)?

  1. Progetto 65 camo.~ (15.39) (3 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  2. FVB183 camo.~ (9.98) (3 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  3. Obj.277 camo.~ (6.84) (3 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  4. Jpz.E100 camo.~ (3.02) (3 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  5. 4005 camo.~ (1.37) (3 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

Would you consider trying these new tanks?

  1. Um, yeah? without a doubt. (7 votes [46.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 46.67%

  2. Probably, at some point. (2 votes [13.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.33%

  3. Nope, the list is too long already, get in line. (1 vote [6.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.67%

  4. The tanks are awful, won't consider. (5 votes [33.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 33.33%

Response(1): Why do you think the tier X tank gun is too strong?

  1. Accuracy (.29 single) (.32 Double) (2 votes [18.18%])

    Percentage of vote: 18.18%

  2. Aim-time (1.7 seconds) (3 votes [27.27%])

    Percentage of vote: 27.27%

  3. Intra-clip reload speeds/ burst time (2.5s single) (3.33s double) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. High penetration HE shells (120mm pen) (4 votes [36.36%])

    Percentage of vote: 36.36%

  5. DPM/Reload speed (36 seconds single) (40 seconds double) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  6. Gun depression (-6 Standard Mode) (-11 Siege Mode) (1 vote [9.09%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.09%

  7. No answer. (It isn't.) (1 vote [9.09%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.09%

Response(2) Why do these tanks look unappealing to play?

  1. Gun is too complicated. (i hav smol bran) (1 vote [16.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.67%

  2. Doesn't have a turret. (MeTa oNly) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. Huge cheese lower plate on a big tank. (cant autopilot) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. Maps too small to effectively use this new gun system. (clean my house) (1 vote [16.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.67%

  5. 3 second siege switch time. (can't take risky positions) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  6. Too strong. (i fight for justice) (2 votes [33.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 33.33%

  7. wow this tank is fun to play actually (2 votes [33.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 33.33%

Vote Guests cannot vote Hide poll

Einzelganger7 #21 Posted Jul 13 2019 - 17:19

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 7993 battles
  • 34
  • [WOLFD] WOLFD
  • Member since:
    09-12-2017

View PostCheshil, on Jul 12 2019 - 20:36, said:

THIS, is how i would want the tanks to act. you are right.

Spoiler

excuse my paint skills also. lol

I see, it is in fact a good parameter for them, the more armored they get, the better they get their cannons to point out at the same direction, I imagine the VT1-1 being kind of similar as how the Badger behaves, second line TD but with assault properties as well, though using mostly the single cannon due to the same fact of being separated on each side of the hull.

p.s: I can see that is a good paint skill, mine was a disaster if we compare them. heh...



BadCorps #22 Posted Jul 13 2019 - 21:33

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 10995 battles
  • 301
  • [4PLDG] 4PLDG
  • Member since:
    07-22-2017
How would sniper mode work with two separate guns?

Cheshil #23 Posted Jul 14 2019 - 04:17

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 14278 battles
  • 129
  • Member since:
    04-09-2015

I'm glad you asked.

I haven't decided if the cannons should be visible or not in double mode. 

Imagine an ELC even 90 sitting in between the guns of a 'VT prot. 101' who is tracked. Hilarious.

 



Cheshil #24 Posted Jul 14 2019 - 04:50

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 14278 battles
  • 129
  • Member since:
    04-09-2015

View PostFiremoth, on Jun 16 2019 - 03:41, said:


so its a two shot foch and a 2 shot foch 155?

 

VT1-2 / Foch comparison

 

The Tier 9 VT 1-2 deals 390 x 2 in a single shot with unparalleled accuracy at 150m or further in 0 seconds.  (.3 base accuracy) (2763 base DPM)

The Tier 9 50 Foch deals 400 x 1(4) over the course of 7.2 seconds. (.35 base accuracy) (2411 base DPM)

////////

VT 101 / Foch 155 comparison

 

The Tier 10 VT 101(120mm gun) deals 420 x 2(2) in a single shot with unparalleled accuracy at 100m or further in 2.5 seconds.  (.29 base accuracy) (2520 base DPM) (1680 total damage)

The Tier 10 Foch (155) deals 750 x 1(3) over the course of 7.2 seconds.  (.35 base accuracy) (2330 base DPM) (2250 total damage)

The Tier 10 VT 101 (152mm gun) deals 750 x 2 in a single shot with accuracy at 100m or further in 0 seconds.  (.32 base accuracy) (2600~ base DPM) (1500 total damage)

^^^^^^^(My post doesn't use the 152mm gun i just made the bottom one up. i still don't plan on using this. wee don't need more 15cms in tier X)^^^^^^^







Also tagged with TechTree, Suggestion, German, TD, TankDestroyer, Poll

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users