Chippy67, on Jun 22 2019 - 11:48, said:
We all accept the possibility, which is exactly why we look for information from the people who have tracked their actual data rather than using confirmation bias as their guiding light.
1) Many (many) people have tried to prove that the game is rigged.
2) None have succeeded.
Not only have they failed to provide proof, no one has even managed to provide some degree of valid evidence Even that lower standard of "valid evidence" has never been met, not in the entire history of WoT. There have been lots and lots of posts with "proof" and "evidence" that turned out to be junk, most of the failures were based on cherry picking, followed by drawing overly broad conclusions from insufficient data, to just plain old bad logic.
3) Therefore, under the most basic rules of reasoning and critical thinking, the game is not rigged.
Just like any theory, it must be assumed that rigging is not taking place until or unless someone is able to provide valid evidence for rigging. If you're as smart as you think you should have no problem understanding this concept.
You can believe whatever you want, but if you want anyone to take that belief seriously you're going to have to do the honest work of providing valid evidence.