SawUcomin, on Jul 14 2019 - 17:17, said:
Pipinghot, on Jul 14 2019 - 19:31, said:
No. Most people have no interest in WoT having later period tanks, only a small group. Never said anything about later periods of tanks beside who are you to speak for everyone else. This lacks evidence
Well, for starters your own poll provides evidence. If you trust your own poll then you have to admit that 75% majority of people don't want another tier added.
And even if you don't trust your own poll, this is not a new idea. It's been suggested before and there are always more people against it than for it, the history on these forums provides additional evidence.
SawUcomin, on Jul 14 2019 - 17:17, said:
Pipinghot, on Jul 14 2019 - 19:31, said:
Terrible idea. Why because it mean contributing monetarily to contribute to the well being of the game
No, because it's a F2P game and locking content behind a pay wall is (almost) universally bad for F2P games. That's not my thinking, that's how industry analysts think and how most F2P games conduct their business. The game is not made up of "Free players" and "Paying players", the vast majority of the player base spends money intermittently, sometimes buying a premium tank, sometimes buying a premium premium subscription for a period of time that they wish, and denying people the right to play the top tier tanks unless they're currently a premium subscriber would chase away more money than it would make. And if you don't believe me, the proof is that Wargaming has never even experimented with such an idea, the people who have made millions and millions of dollars from this game already know that it would be a terrible idea, because they study the game industry and they see how it has affected other F2P games. WoT does not exists in a vacuum, they are well aware of their place in the gaming industry and how ideas like this would affect them.
SawUcomin, on Jul 14 2019 - 17:17, said:
Pipinghot, on Jul 14 2019 - 19:31, said:
No. unsubstaciated either way
You started with an unsubstantiated claim, but that didn't stop you from printing it as though you had a clue. You don't get to throw out the "unsubstantiated" card just because you don't like the reply. Edit your OP and print a retractions, if you're an honest person.
SawUcomin, on Jul 14 2019 - 17:17, said:
Pipinghot, on Jul 14 2019 - 19:31, said:
You're a class act, way to go.Not here to appease you !
Never said you were, you're making another false argument. And right back at ya' , you were a jerk in your OP and I don't care whether you like being told that.
SawUcomin, on Jul 14 2019 - 17:17, said:
Pipinghot, on Jul 14 2019 - 19:31, said:
Yeah, you're definitely classy. So impressive. It isnt my Gif thats shows the dogs nuts! And once again..Who are you?(Or who do you think you are)
Someone who knows a jerk when he sees one.
p.s. It's a kitten, if you're going to try to trade insults at least get it right.
SawUcomin, on Jul 14 2019 - 17:17, said:
Pipinghot, on Jul 14 2019 - 19:31, said:
Your own post puts the lie to this statement, you're not fooling anyone. Its tongue in cheek, are you really that tightly wound ?
Haha nice try, but no, you're not fooling anyone.
1
This topic is locked
