Jump to content


Some People Just Have RNG Armor


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

destroika #1 Posted Jul 14 2019 - 06:44

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 18136 battles
  • 94
  • Member since:
    03-17-2012
https://streamable.com/m8ax1

JakeTheMystic #2 Posted Jul 14 2019 - 06:56

    Major

  • Players
  • 24982 battles
  • 2,889
  • [OPIC] OPIC
  • Member since:
    12-30-2011
the LeFH is a horrible tank, change my mind...

Lucasonoff #3 Posted Jul 14 2019 - 13:55

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 22426 battles
  • 92
  • Member since:
    04-19-2014

since they nerf the LeFH it has been horrible because it misses most shot shoot wide and of course has no stun damage...what is a piss of is that arty was good before nerfing and hence why I spent money buying, but WG does not care they put tank on sale with high rate of damage to entice buying then they nerf them...they should be force to reimburse player.

 

in real life when you buy something and it is not what was advertised they have to reimburse you...but Russian could care less about the player base...just rake cash...



GenPanzer #4 Posted Jul 14 2019 - 14:09

    Major

  • Players
  • 44875 battles
  • 3,790
  • [EFFIT] EFFIT
  • Member since:
    08-15-2011

View PostLucasonoff, on Jul 14 2019 - 07:55, said:

since they nerf the LeFH it has been horrible because it misses most shot shoot wide and of course has no stun damage...what is a piss of is that arty was good before nerfing and hence why I spent money buying, but WG does not care they put tank on sale with high rate of damage to entice buying then they nerf them...they should be force to reimburse player.

 

in real life when you buy something and it is not what was advertised they have to reimburse you...but Russian could care less about the player base...just rake cash...

 

Read the license agreement you agreed to. WG CAN CHANGE ANYTHING THEY WANT WITHOUT ANYONE'S PERMISSION. No refund for you!



HOTA_CHATON #5 Posted Jul 14 2019 - 14:26

    Major

  • Players
  • 13573 battles
  • 14,768
  • [MSG] MSG
  • Member since:
    09-28-2011
The Leaf Blower has not been nerfed.  I don't know where you get your information but it's still the same as it was.  The last one to get nerfed was the Type 59 and it needed it.  Besides, I happen to love my LB.

destroika #6 Posted Jul 14 2019 - 18:09

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 18136 battles
  • 94
  • Member since:
    03-17-2012
Actually, I like the LEF just fine, it normally does really good. Occasionally my gunner just gets a bit drunk before a match and I'd like to slap him sober.

InfinityGamer #7 Posted Jul 14 2019 - 18:29

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 34939 battles
  • 253
  • [GIVUP] GIVUP
  • Member since:
    03-29-2013
You are playing arty and you missed a few shots... One of the most pointless forum posts I've seen.

Pipinghot #8 Posted Jul 14 2019 - 19:33

    Major

  • Players
  • 25960 battles
  • 10,551
  • [IOC] IOC
  • Member since:
    11-20-2011

View PostLucasonoff, on Jul 14 2019 - 07:55, said:

since they nerf the LeFH

[Edit: Correction to my post provided by Apache1990]


Edited by Pipinghot, Jul 15 2019 - 01:41.


Mad_Dog_Seabee #9 Posted Jul 14 2019 - 20:01

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 14996 battles
  • 1,847
  • [-RG--] -RG--
  • Member since:
    10-07-2015
Stun only sucks when are suffering in it, but is incredibly fun when you are slinging it, change my mind.

Apache1990 #10 Posted Jul 14 2019 - 20:19

    Major

  • Players
  • 35603 battles
  • 6,976
  • Member since:
    06-16-2011

View PostHOTA_CHATON, on Jul 14 2019 - 09:26, said:

The Leaf Blower has not been nerfed.  I don't know where you get your information but it's still the same as it was.  The last one to get nerfed was the Type 59 and it needed it.  Besides, I happen to love my LB.

View PostPipinghot, on Jul 14 2019 - 14:33, said:

That didn't happen, what are you talking about?

 

It's nerfed in accuracy and RoF compared to when it was a T4, but it kept enough to stay really annoying.



Flarvin #11 Posted Jul 14 2019 - 20:20

    Major

  • Players
  • 54814 battles
  • 17,053
  • Member since:
    03-29-2013

View PostApache1990, on Jul 14 2019 - 14:19, said:

It's nerfed in accuracy and RoF compared to when it was a T4, but it kept enough to stay really annoying.

 

Link to patch notes would help. 



Apache1990 #12 Posted Jul 14 2019 - 20:55

    Major

  • Players
  • 35603 battles
  • 6,976
  • Member since:
    06-16-2011

View PostFlarvin, on Jul 14 2019 - 15:20, said:

Link to patch notes would help. 

 

The patch notes are completely missing for the full balance changes for some reason, but here:

.49 base accuracy before (pre-0.8.6 artillery nerf/rework): https://web.archive.org/web/20130512052726/http://wiki.worldoftanks.com/105_leFH18B2

.74 base accuracy now: https://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Tank:F28_105_leFH18B2

(it was accuracy only rather than RoF, but I was still partly right)



Flarvin #13 Posted Jul 14 2019 - 21:27

    Major

  • Players
  • 54814 battles
  • 17,053
  • Member since:
    03-29-2013

View PostApache1990, on Jul 14 2019 - 14:55, said:

 

The patch notes are completely missing for the full balance changes for some reason, but here:

.49 base accuracy before (pre-0.8.6 artillery nerf/rework): https://web.archive.org/web/20130512052726/http://wiki.worldoftanks.com/105_leFH18B2

.74 base accuracy now: https://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Tank:F28_105_leFH18B2

(it was accuracy only rather than RoF, but I was still partly right)

 

Thanks. 

 

There are so many false claims about changes, providing a source is about the only way to be trusted. 



Pipinghot #14 Posted Jul 15 2019 - 01:42

    Major

  • Players
  • 25960 battles
  • 10,551
  • [IOC] IOC
  • Member since:
    11-20-2011

View PostApache1990, on Jul 14 2019 - 14:55, said:

The patch notes are completely missing for the full balance changes for some reason, but here:

.49 base accuracy before (pre-0.8.6 artillery nerf/rework): https://web.archive.org/web/20130512052726/http://wiki.worldoftanks.com/105_leFH18B2

.74 base accuracy now: https://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Tank:F28_105_leFH18B2

(it was accuracy only rather than RoF, but I was still partly right)

Thank you from me too, for the same reason. I've edited my previous post to show that I was wrong.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users