14 replies to this topic

[another505]

both the same tier

t59 with with stock gun of t54 and armor design of it

while t44 has the same old guns since t3485, armor is good but not as good as t54 or t59

same speed i guess

i mean whats the chance of t44 beating a t59 in a duel

unless t44 is using the 122 with luck, then pretty much there no chance of winning in anyways....

so should the  dev buff the t44 guns?

[Veneroso]

They type 59 is pretty slow.  You should be able to get around it and shoot it in the rear.

[Bean223]

I got a T59(my first Prem tank) and I gotta say its a toss up. One on one all things being even I think it'll depend on the driver. But it'll lean ever so slightly to the Type59, but not by much.

[tritri08]

t-44 can be easily penetrated by Type 59 gun. My Type 59 can bounce many shots from T-44.
The weakness of type 59 is the ammo rack and engine power. After buying Wet ammo rack and Quality oil, I feel safer when playing Type 59    
This is my experience.

[ForceX]

Quality oil = 5k per match ?

[Prav]

It's a premium tank, spending 5k on a consumable is trivial.

[ForceX]

ah, I forgot about it's premium state

[Ackshun]

ForceX, on Sep 26 2011 - 10:23, said:

Quality oil = 5k per match ?

Ok so 5k for oil 8k for repair (if destroyed) no more than 2k for ammo  match results 80k+ yeah 65k+ pure profit no thought needs to be done here really!

[JDCollie]

I don't have a T-44, but I'm not scared of them when driving my Type 59. I'll kill the the T-44 about seventy percent of the time in an even fight.

[another505]

thats the problem! t44 is wayy underpower than the t59, and its unique ability such as bouncing shells, go really fast, very low are all weaker than the t59
+ the t44 has the WORST AMMO RACK, worse than the t59
i wish the devs at least give the LB1 or 1945 d10t gun to the t44

[Arzoo]

another505, on Sep 30 2011 - 04:43, said:

thats the problem! t44 is wayy underpower than the t59, and its unique ability such as bouncing shells, go really fast, very low are all weaker than the t59
+ the t44 has the WORST AMMO RACK, worse than the t59
i wish the devs at least give the LB1 or 1945 d10t gun to the t44

Pretty sure the Type-59 has an ammo-rack that is at least as bad as the T-44s. Maybe it's just that no one realizes they need the wet-rack yet, but I've been one-shotting Type-59s all over the place lately.

[rubb3rducky]

I rememebr my Su-85 (107 mm of course) shooting the back of a T-59 (Td flanking a medium, yeah its kind of hard to explain). I just pointed my shot neatly down center. Next thing you know it says "We got him" ....DERRRPP..

[Kyoji]

please stop making threads until you know the facts.

[DeadLight]

rubb3rducky, on Oct 08 2011 - 21:29, said:

I rememebr my Su-85 (107 mm of course) shooting the back of a T-59 (Td flanking a medium, yeah its kind of hard to explain). I just pointed my shot neatly down center. Next thing you know it says "We got him" ....DERRRPP..

Just like the T-44 the T59 needs a WAR then its alright.Really i don't see the problem people are having with killing the T59.

[Mizar_Panzer]

tritri08, on Sep 26 2011 - 06:32, said:

t-44 can be easily penetrated by Type 59 gun. My Type 59 can bounce many shots from T-44.
The weakness of type 59 is the ammo rack and engine power. After buying Wet ammo rack and Quality oil, I feel safer when playing Type 59    
This is my experience.

T59 + consumeble > T44, what kind of comparison is this?

I play my T44 with quality oil + engine limit remover, and I can circle T59s as I circle panther IIs. The only irritating thing about them is the turret, and that there's just so many of them, and a lot of them are not afraid of dying.

Also, a hint: the T59 has a glaring frontal weakspot on its upper plate and by shooting there you can damage the engine and set it on fire.