Jump to content


Double barrels guns(Your thoughts?)


  • Please log in to reply
100 replies to this topic

MajorRenegade #1 Posted Sep 16 2019 - 16:54

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 30395 battles
  • 8,963
  • Member since:
    11-18-2010

me personally, I don't think they will be overpowered as people going to claim. They will be just a worse t30 with armor if you fire both guns at the same time and if you miss both shots during the aiming progress, good luck lol. Since we already have autoreloaders in the game, they shouldn't be to hard to fight against once players figure out how to fight them. Just like any other new tanks in the game

 

your thoughts?


Edited by MajorRenegade, Sep 16 2019 - 17:12.


HOTA_CHATON #2 Posted Sep 16 2019 - 16:56

    Major

  • Players
  • 13608 battles
  • 14,829
  • [MSG] MSG
  • Member since:
    09-28-2011
Lets just see, if they can get it right and not mess it up.  It may actually turn out to be a great option.

nuclearguy931 #3 Posted Sep 16 2019 - 17:02

    Major

  • Players
  • 82515 battles
  • 10,982
  • [UMM] UMM
  • Member since:
    08-16-2011
It's different for sure, which is why so many will want them, but in my opinion they're not necessary. 

DVK9 #4 Posted Sep 16 2019 - 17:04

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 26154 battles
  • 956
  • [-TX-] -TX-
  • Member since:
    05-15-2013

ok this helps open the door for them to bring in the Landkreuzer P. 1000 "Ratte .

2 cannons off a battleship, manned by 40 men. 20 and 128 mm side and rear turrets.

Armor 150–360 mm (5.9–14.2 in)
Main
armament
2 × 280 mm 54.5 SK C/34
Secondary
armament
1 × 128 mm KwK 44 L/55
8 × 20 mm Flak38
2 × 15 mm MG 151/15

Edited by DVK9, Sep 16 2019 - 17:05.


MajorRenegade #5 Posted Sep 16 2019 - 17:06

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 30395 battles
  • 8,963
  • Member since:
    11-18-2010

View PostDVK9, on Sep 16 2019 - 11:04, said:

ok this helps open the door for them to bring in the Landkreuzer P. 1000 "Ratte .

2 cannons off a battleship, manned by 40 men. 20 and 128 mm side and rear turrets.

Armor 150–360 mm (5.9–14.2 in)
Main
armament
2 × 280 mm 54.5 SK C/34
Secondary
armament
1 × 128 mm KwK 44 L/55
8 × 20 mm Flak38
2 × 15 mm MG 151/15


I can see them adding it as a april fool event. A real one and not a fake video that wargaming did years ago in open beta I believe


Edited by MajorRenegade, Sep 16 2019 - 17:07.


RoundsDownRange #6 Posted Sep 16 2019 - 17:08

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 28852 battles
  • 116
  • Member since:
    05-03-2013
WOT is getting desperate having to come up with crap like this.  I saw this on the Steam announcement and said wth.  I am so glad I stopped playing a while back.  WOT keeps going down hill at one point I use to play 6+ hours a day, but no more because they have lost their focus and do crap like this.  

AJABOOBOO #7 Posted Sep 16 2019 - 17:09

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7153 battles
  • 130
  • [74TH] 74TH
  • Member since:
    08-13-2011

more gimmicks and nonsense instead of re-balancing the game, turning off the patented progression limiter, removing russian bias and in general making the game an actual game where skill and experience out weighs paying money.

 

this is just another way to attempt to rebuild the player base which came out from a company that has become so detached from reality that they actually thought this would be a good idea.

 

duel firing tanks dont work because of lack of interior space and mechanical issues that arise form that.

 

not that WG cares about balance, historical realism, or anything that is not stupidly pro russian or that will make them a quick buck.

 

 


Edited by AJABOOBOO, Sep 16 2019 - 17:10.


_Tsavo_ #8 Posted Sep 16 2019 - 17:16

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 46542 battles
  • 19,882
  • [RELIC] RELIC
  • Member since:
    02-16-2011

It's just gonna be more "Balans, Comrade" tanks.  

 

I'd rather see another American medium tree, or more Brit tanks than even more Soviet tanks.  Just bland-o-matic RUtonks


Edited by _Tsavo_, Sep 16 2019 - 17:17.


Nonamanadus #9 Posted Sep 16 2019 - 17:16

    Major

  • Players
  • 32433 battles
  • 4,100
  • [HBG] HBG
  • Member since:
    02-02-2013
Rather have them put in a Big Bertha gun. 

iiNSaNiiTY #10 Posted Sep 16 2019 - 17:22

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 19267 battles
  • 1,532
  • [-TRD-] -TRD-
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014


TVWizard2 #11 Posted Sep 16 2019 - 17:38

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 723 battles
  • 150
  • Member since:
    06-21-2018

No no no...

 

I thought wheeled tanks were bad enough, last thing I want in this game is ANOTHER extremely broken tank, a DOUBLE BARREL TANK?? wthWG

 

god this game is just gonna get worse and worse, WG will never get their heads out of their a$$es



Tao_Te_Tomato #12 Posted Sep 16 2019 - 17:48

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 27827 battles
  • 2,788
  • [TER] TER
  • Member since:
    02-28-2016
I'm going to hold out for a gatling.   Something in 57mm, spamming gold, mounted on, say, a Defender hull and turret....

Edited by Tao_Te_Tomato, Sep 16 2019 - 17:49.


TVWizard2 #13 Posted Sep 16 2019 - 17:50

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 723 battles
  • 150
  • Member since:
    06-21-2018

View PostTao_Te_Tomato, on Sep 16 2019 - 17:48, said:

I'm going to hold out for a gatling.

really wouldn't put it past WG at this point, they'll throw anything they can into their cesspit of a game

 

Triple barreled E-100?? SURE, PUT THAT IN THERE

Double barreled STI?? WHY NOT, SOUNDS LIKE A GREAT ADDITION

Experimental German Gauss cannon tank?? Sure, be sure to give it 2000 alpha

 

ugh :facepalm:



Mancu #14 Posted Sep 16 2019 - 17:53

    Major

  • Players
  • 21647 battles
  • 2,189
  • [T_K_O] T_K_O
  • Member since:
    06-11-2011
Personally, I'm waiting for them to add the dragons and wizards tech tree.

Cowcat137 #15 Posted Sep 16 2019 - 17:56

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 14248 battles
  • 6,811
  • [6-ACR] 6-ACR
  • Member since:
    08-17-2015


Cowcat137 #16 Posted Sep 16 2019 - 17:59

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 14248 battles
  • 6,811
  • [6-ACR] 6-ACR
  • Member since:
    08-17-2015
Objekt 279 Late : four tracks, four loaders and four cannons.

f95marcus #17 Posted Sep 16 2019 - 18:04

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 55074 battles
  • 51
  • [AIMED] AIMED
  • Member since:
    06-09-2012

A simple NOOOOO ty from me. Wheeled vehicles were bad enough, this would further

ruin the game for me. I am already playing much less.


 



Tao_Te_Tomato #18 Posted Sep 16 2019 - 18:05

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 27827 battles
  • 2,788
  • [TER] TER
  • Member since:
    02-28-2016

View PostTVWizard2, on Sep 16 2019 - 17:50, said:

really wouldn't put it past WG at this point, they'll throw anything they can into their cesspit of a game

 

Triple barreled E-100?? SURE, PUT THAT IN THERE

Double barreled STI?? WHY NOT, SOUNDS LIKE A GREAT ADDITION

Experimental German Gauss cannon tank?? Sure, be sure to give it 2000 alpha

 

ugh :facepalm:

 

Plasma rifle in the 40 watt range.



TELEFORCE #19 Posted Sep 16 2019 - 18:09

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 14376 battles
  • 923
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011
The more I read this, the more I would actually like a tank version of Warship Gunner :B

redjkent #20 Posted Sep 16 2019 - 18:17

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 98148 battles
  • 1,281
  • [Y2KBB] Y2KBB
  • Member since:
    07-24-2014
i dont know what people expect from an arcade shooter, realism is not part of arcade games, also your playing a free to play game they have to make there money somehow they should go to a subscription based system gets rid of the freeloaders they dont care about this game anyhow no lose in losing them




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users