Jump to content


GAME IS RIGGED!


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

GeneralAirforce #1 Posted Sep 17 2019 - 23:41

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 0 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    06-06-2012
Hi. In 3 days, 25 battles I won only 3.  I want to know exactly how matchmaking works. Not like what tiers are matching together but how exactly you select the specific players for each game. So obviously you stack casual players together to play against experienced skilled players and as a result the win is predicted already in the beginning of the battle. I want bare proofs from you of the opposite. Thanks.

__WarChild__ #2 Posted Sep 17 2019 - 23:46

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 33356 battles
  • 6,070
  • [OPIC] OPIC
  • Member since:
    06-03-2017

You are 100% correct.  Congratulations on figuring that out!

 

:great:



GenPanzer #3 Posted Sep 17 2019 - 23:49

    Major

  • Players
  • 44900 battles
  • 3,791
  • [EFFIT] EFFIT
  • Member since:
    08-15-2011
You are rigged, because your account shows no battles.

Markd73 #4 Posted Sep 17 2019 - 23:50

    Major

  • Players
  • 32795 battles
  • 5,487
  • Member since:
    04-20-2011

View PostGeneralAirforce, on Sep 17 2019 - 22:41, said:

Hi. In 3 days, 25 battles I won only 3.  I want to know exactly how matchmaking works. Not like what tiers are matching together but how exactly you select the specific players for each game. So obviously you stack casual players together to play against experienced skilled players and as a result the win is predicted already in the beginning of the battle. I want bare proofs from you of the opposite. Thanks.

 

You are shifting the burden of proof.

https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/222/Shifting-of-the-Burden-of-Proof

 

It is up to the person making the claim to provide evidence. We can simply dismiss your claim until you  provide said evidence.


Edited by Markd73, Sep 17 2019 - 23:51.


Moose_Sausage #5 Posted Sep 17 2019 - 23:57

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 28891 battles
  • 217
  • [CDEV] CDEV
  • Member since:
    07-29-2013
Get him, George.

_Tsavo_ #6 Posted Sep 17 2019 - 23:58

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 46490 battles
  • 19,863
  • [RELIC] RELIC
  • Member since:
    02-16-2011

View PostGeneralAirforce, on Sep 17 2019 - 17:41, said:

Hi. In 3 days, 25 battles I won only 3.  I want to know exactly how matchmaking works. Not like what tiers are matching together but how exactly you select the specific players for each game. So obviously you stack casual players together to play against experienced skilled players and as a result the win is predicted already in the beginning of the battle. I want bare proofs from you of the opposite. Thanks.

 

Two things:

 

1.) You made the claim, so the burden of proof is on you.  That which is claimed without evidence is dismissed without evidence.

2.) https://wiki.wargami...Matchmaker_(WoT)  There you go, how it works.



__WarChild__ #7 Posted Sep 18 2019 - 00:06

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 33356 battles
  • 6,070
  • [OPIC] OPIC
  • Member since:
    06-03-2017

Y'all are ruining this.  OP is onto something here...

 

:trollface:



Ndtm #8 Posted Sep 18 2019 - 00:07

    Major

  • Players
  • 17694 battles
  • 4,624
  • Member since:
    05-01-2012

View PostGeneralAirforce, on Sep 17 2019 - 23:41, said:

Hi. In 3 days, 25 battles I won only 3.  I want to know exactly how matchmaking works. Not like what tiers are matching together but how exactly you select the specific players for each game. So obviously you stack casual players together to play against experienced skilled players and as a result the win is predicted already in the beginning of the battle. I want bare proofs from you of the opposite. Thanks.

What..? are you saying good players can't be "casual"? is your definition of "casual" only "bad" players?

View Post_Tsavo_, on Sep 17 2019 - 23:58, said:

Two things:

 

1.) You made the claim, so the burden of proof is on you.  That which is claimed without evidence is dismissed without evidence.

2.) https://wiki.wargami...Matchmaker_(WoT)  There you go, how it works.

Dun goofed the url (the closing parentheses)



Later_o7 #9 Posted Sep 18 2019 - 00:16

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 21038 battles
  • 88
  • [YOUJO] YOUJO
  • Member since:
    07-20-2013
nice b8 m8

Projectile_Misfired #10 Posted Sep 18 2019 - 00:46

    Major

  • Players
  • 38695 battles
  • 2,954
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012

View PostGeneralAirforce, on Sep 17 2019 - 22:41, said:

Hi. In 3 days, 25 battles I won only 3.  I want to know exactly how matchmaking works. Not like what tiers are matching together but how exactly you select the specific players for each game. So obviously you stack casual players together to play against experienced skilled players and as a result the win is predicted already in the beginning of the battle. I want bare proofs from you of the opposite. Thanks.

You have it wrong OP. MM is not stacking the teams to determine which will win and which will lose. 

That is left completely up to RNG. Remember, it's "plus" OR "minus" 25%. 

Therefore, one team will get the "+25%" RNG. While the other team gets the "-25%" RNG. It's simply a 50/50 shot that you'd land on the team with the "+25%".

 

Don't get me wrong OP. I'm not saying that the team with the "+25%" RNG will always win. There are some players out there that can actually overcome the "-25%" RNG handicap. Place a few of those type of players on the same team, and the advantage that the "+25%" RNG had could be moot.



ArmorStorm #11 Posted Sep 18 2019 - 02:06

    Major

  • Players
  • 37704 battles
  • 8,632
  • [F__R] F__R
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View PostProjectile_Misfired, on Sep 17 2019 - 17:46, said:

You have it wrong OP. MM is not stacking the teams to determine which will win and which will lose. 

That is left completely up to RNG. Remember, it's "plus" OR "minus" 25%. 

Therefore, one team will get the "+25%" RNG. While the other team gets the "-25%" RNG. It's simply a 50/50 shot that you'd land on the team with the "+25%".

 

Don't get me wrong OP. I'm not saying that the team with the "+25%" RNG will always win. There are some players out there that can actually overcome the "-25%" RNG handicap. Place a few of those type of players on the same team, and the advantage that the "+25%" RNG had could be moot.



VooDooKobra #12 Posted Sep 18 2019 - 02:11

    Major

  • Players
  • 10035 battles
  • 5,959
  • [MOVE] MOVE
  • Member since:
    04-23-2011
sooooo you make an account, no tanks, no battles and we are supposed to be like little sheep and believe what you say out of the goodness in our spleens?  oh wait or was it the goodness in our liver?

Blocksupstudios #13 Posted Sep 18 2019 - 02:22

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 13632 battles
  • 491
  • Member since:
    06-22-2013

1) make a new account

2) go on the forums

3) make a post about how "MM is rigged"

4) profit!



GeorgePreddy #14 Posted Sep 18 2019 - 03:11

    Major

  • Players
  • 14680 battles
  • 13,667
  • Member since:
    04-11-2013

View PostMoose_Sausage, on Sep 17 2019 - 19:57, said:

Get him, George.

 

It's simple... Random Battles MM is skill-random, WG says that indubitably, and there is absolutely no hard evidence otherwise, and therefore, according to Ockham's Razor, you should accept that.

 

 

 

 

 

 



rockbutcher #15 Posted Sep 18 2019 - 03:24

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 22644 battles
  • 1,105
  • [-OPS-] -OPS-
  • Member since:
    03-06-2015

View PostBlocksupstudios, on Sep 17 2019 - 20:22, said:

1) make a new account

2) go on the forums

3) make a post about how "MM is rigged"

4) profit!


Look at his 'member since.'  Still a troll, and he got you.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users