Jump to content


Do you believe Change towards the game is Mandatory?


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

lonezewolf #1 Posted Oct 19 2019 - 04:48

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 15576 battles
  • 1,313
  • [PTON] PTON
  • Member since:
    05-17-2014

Now, this was just a question that came to me very recently. Change, the change that has developed this world we live in from the stone-age to modern technology, Its the same for this game, yet I wasn't able to experience the beginning of this game. Some would perhaps say it was a real man's game, when the Kv-2 used to be tier 5 (That I heard) Or the overpowered M18-Hellcat. Or perhaps when the Kv-1 used to have a derp gun (Hardly remember this). 


Yet, lets come back to the point shall we, the game is in need of a change, and yes I understand its been changing progressively, yet, its not changing where the majority of the community can be happy. I won't say the whole of the WOT community can be pleased. However, judging by the never-ending forums of mm, and perhaps the new tanks that you have to buy could never earn them. (Personally I would like to earn the T34). 

 

 

I wouldn't know where to begin with this game, personally I would increase the players per match. Instead of always having 15 v 15, I would change more to a 30 v 30. It would add more of a variety, and keep the game a little interesting. I also wouldn't change any of the tanks and their characteristics. I personally don't have the knowledge to even begin with doing so.. However, not to bring up MM but its an inevitable subject to not bring up, I would only have it in specific tiers, not higher than its current tier. (For example) The T29 is great when its playing tiers 7 and below. However, it does have the ability to go up into high tier games, such as IX. This is when playing the game goes out of the window, as your gun pen will not be able to pen the hull of a Type tier 9 (Don't remember the name) Unless the player is of course not paying any attention to you. Even then, penning it at certain angle, would probably give it  back massage.

 

 

So I would just keep tiers strictly to its tiers, tier 5's stay on 5's and tier 10's stay on 10s. Perhaps for tier 10's it may make the credit expenditure a little more expensive, but its always fun to have the opportunity to go toe to toe.

 

 

All in all, all comments are welcomed. And I hope ya'll have a lovely weekend. 



Copacetic #2 Posted Oct 19 2019 - 05:05

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 47994 battles
  • 1,722
  • [ZEUS] ZEUS
  • Member since:
    02-04-2014

we do have a 30v30



lonezewolf #3 Posted Oct 19 2019 - 05:19

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 15576 battles
  • 1,313
  • [PTON] PTON
  • Member since:
    05-17-2014

View PostCopacetic, on Oct 19 2019 - 05:05, said:

we do have a 30v30

I meant in general games, not specific game types. 



alphadogg64 #4 Posted Oct 19 2019 - 05:33

    Captain

  • Players
  • 1163 battles
  • 1,077
  • Member since:
    08-17-2012
"when the Kv-2 used to be tier 5" "Or perhaps when the Kv-1 used to have a derp gun" Same thing. It was a tier 5 KV (no following number) with the KV-2s characteristics, which was followed by the KV-3 at tier 6.

ARR0ZD0CE #5 Posted Oct 19 2019 - 05:41

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 4480 battles
  • 125
  • Member since:
    03-27-2017
aren't the maps already pretty small for 15v15? not all of them I guess but i think making 30vs30 would need a whole bunch of new maps. Theres a 30v30 mode i'm pretty sure but i think its for tier 10's

CynicalDutchie #6 Posted Oct 19 2019 - 10:28

    Major

  • Players
  • 43683 battles
  • 4,495
  • [CYNIC] CYNIC
  • Member since:
    05-18-2011
The maps we currently have for random battles are way too small for 30v30 battles, they're even to small for 15v15 battles if we're being completely honest. If they were to change battles to a 30v30 format they'd have to remove every single map and replace them with bigger ones.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users