


ZZZ Bad Groups
#1 Posted Nov 12 2019 - 15:53

#2 Posted Nov 12 2019 - 15:59
Its not really complicated why bads are bad.
Their brains are trained by this game to be passive cucks, and lets be real most decent players have to be since there's really no other option unless you've really got your act together. Artillery punishes you for being spotted ever. Tank destroyers wipe half your HP in 1 shot, or 2 shots when you advance. No one is going to move up.
Since people don't understand how battles actually work, they think if they cluster it'll work.
Tanks need space so they can take cover in this game, because guns beat armor. That's just how it is. Pubbies don't understand that so they like to cluster.
Others think they can push and get annihilated since WG doesn't understand mega alpha and or DPM combined with super high penetration is terrible for the game.
And since WG's sold themselves into a self imposed corner...
They also won't fix it, since they're probably off to their next great project.
Said the great and mighty scrublord [edited]can
Edited by Guardianleopard, Nov 12 2019 - 16:03.
#3 Posted Nov 12 2019 - 16:05

#4 Posted Nov 12 2019 - 16:38
#5 Posted Nov 12 2019 - 17:11
Sonny_2013, on Nov 12 2019 - 11:53, said:
This is how randomness works, over the long run it helps you the same amount as it hurts you... sometimes it runs in streaks, other times it is very scattered... but in the end it is very equal about how it treats you.
What YOU bring to the party is more important, as that is what distinguishes you from average (good or bad). Over time, randomness gives you 14 average players on your teams and 15 average players against you, therefore YOU are what makes the difference and YOU are what gets you your win rate.
#6 Posted Nov 12 2019 - 17:15
Sonny_2013, on Nov 12 2019 - 08:53, said:

I don't mean this to be disparaging, but what if the "good run" was the abnormality that has returned to your norm?
#7 Posted Nov 12 2019 - 18:20
*ahem*
literally every time I have gotten my recents up to 60% I get a solid week or more of 0.3 dmg ratio, and/or chronic afkers polluting my teams on top of the most cancerous of crappy funnel maps.
do I think I'm a 60% player? no, not really. and the non-stop bot teams don't bother me that much (or apparently wargaming because they let folks like smellycolornumber (a pseudonym for a famous botter) pollute the queues for well over 100k battles). but, when those same bot teams are also synced to the most cancerous of repetitive trash small and funnel face check maps, that's when my personal entertainment value is greatly diminished to the point that I have a very rough time recommending the game, spending money on the game, or even bothering to participate in the player population...
#8 Posted Nov 12 2019 - 18:22
HOTA_CHATON, on Nov 12 2019 - 15:05, said:

So if a bad player makes clearly illogical statements that are not backed by credible evidence, then others shouldn't point it out?
How do you improve/reduce frustration if you are not willing to objectively measure your own mistakes and adjust?
#9 Posted Nov 12 2019 - 18:47
Markd73, on Nov 12 2019 - 12:22, said:
So if a bad player makes clearly illogical statements that are not backed by credible evidence, then others shouldn't point it out?
How do you improve/reduce frustration if you are not willing to objectively measure your own mistakes and adjust?
this part I get. but when strings of matches happen like this one on bad maps some of us can be forgiven for thinking that the only mistake made was actually playing the game...
http://wotreplays.eu/site/5088407#overlord-thepigsheflies-amx_13_90
#10 Posted Nov 12 2019 - 20:02
ThePigSheFlies, on Nov 12 2019 - 17:47, said:
this part I get. but when strings of matches happen like this one on bad maps some of us can be forgiven for thinking that the only mistake made was actually playing the game...
http://wotreplays.eu/site/5088407#overlord-thepigsheflies-amx_13_90
Good point
#11 Posted Nov 12 2019 - 20:57
Edited by Sonny_2013, Nov 12 2019 - 20:58.
#12 Posted Nov 12 2019 - 22:09
Sonny_2013, on Nov 12 2019 - 19:57, said:
You are thinking from an individual game perspective.
Over a large enough sample size, then your winrate is what you have earned.
#13 Posted Nov 13 2019 - 00:51
Sonny_2013, on Nov 12 2019 - 06:53, said:

Responses to your posts are increasingly technical so, what specific criteria did you utilize to determine 1) It's just "dummies", 2) Said "dummies" actually refused to win and 3) Why you are unable to help these alleged "dummies".
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users