Jump to content


Battle XP getting added to already owned Collectors tanks

New Balance BattleXP Collector Tanks Sandbox Jumbo Firefly

  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

mattts1 #1 Posted Feb 12 2020 - 00:19

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 8529 battles
  • 17
  • [ASD] ASD
  • Member since:
    10-01-2016
I noticed I now have a huge amount of Battle XP on my Jumbo, Firefly, and Churchill GC. Im guessing the value of all the components that were removed. Obviously there was already some battle XP on these tanks but no where near the 42k on the jumbo, 22k on the Firefly, and I believe 13k on the CGC.

There needs to be a better way to compensate players then dumping Battle xp on them. Considering it would require gold to make it useful.

Edited by mattts1, Feb 12 2020 - 03:01.


SKurj #2 Posted Feb 12 2020 - 00:24

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 16852 battles
  • 3,953
  • [FEELZ] FEELZ
  • Member since:
    09-05-2010

makes sense from wg point of view it costs you real cash then to make the xp useful...

 

of course no need to put the customer first...



TommyBuns #3 Posted Feb 12 2020 - 00:33

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 22492 battles
  • 909
  • Member since:
    12-31-2017

LOL... No matter what the players cry for, WG always finds a way to deliver it in an underhanded manner which enrages the player base . It's like a virtual rendition of 'The Monkeys Paw'.

 

Moral of the story?       Be careful what you ask for.



Collapsed_Eigenfunction #4 Posted Feb 12 2020 - 01:04

    Major

  • Players
  • 29323 battles
  • 5,282
  • [VALUE] VALUE
  • Member since:
    12-06-2011

View PostTommyBuns, on Feb 11 2020 - 23:33, said:

LOL... No matter what the players cry for, WG always finds a way to deliver it in an underhanded manner which enrages the player base . It's like a virtual rendition of 'The Monkeys Paw'.

 

Moral of the story?       Be careful what you ask for.


I never asked them to remove 20% of the game



dagengster #5 Posted Feb 12 2020 - 01:05

    Major

  • Players
  • 16440 battles
  • 4,681
  • [PHASE] PHASE
  • Member since:
    02-13-2012

Turn on accelerated crew training. This way, the exp u get from that point on will go into leveling your crew from non prem tanks.

Prems are meant to grind credits and exp (they get exp bonus).



mattts1 #6 Posted Feb 12 2020 - 01:52

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 8529 battles
  • 17
  • [ASD] ASD
  • Member since:
    10-01-2016

View Postdagengster, on Feb 11 2020 - 19:05, said:

Turn on accelerated crew training. This way, the exp u get from that point on will go into leveling your crew from non prem tanks.

Prems are meant to grind credits and exp (they get exp bonus).


I think you misunderstand the point of this post.. This is after the switch of the T6 vehicles to collector tanks so the accelerate crew training has presumably already been clicked.



CaptSpaulding55 #7 Posted Feb 12 2020 - 02:04

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 35840 battles
  • 829
  • Member since:
    04-28-2013

View PostTommyBuns, on Feb 11 2020 - 18:33, said:

 

 

Moral of the story?       Be careful what you ask for.

I, and many others, have been asking for new maps for what seems like forever.  



mattts1 #8 Posted Feb 12 2020 - 02:06

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 8529 battles
  • 17
  • [ASD] ASD
  • Member since:
    10-01-2016
There are 3 maps on the horizon.. Pearl River, Berlin (a new one), forget the third one.. But that is off topic for this post.

mrmojo #9 Posted Feb 12 2020 - 02:08

    Major

  • Players
  • 20503 battles
  • 2,970
  • [-LEG-] -LEG-
  • Member since:
    07-24-2011
Maybe the horizon on Mars

TommyBuns #10 Posted Feb 12 2020 - 02:29

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 22492 battles
  • 909
  • Member since:
    12-31-2017

View PostCollapsed_Eigenfunction, on Feb 11 2020 - 19:04, said:


I never asked them to remove 20% of the game

 

View PostCaptSpaulding55, on Feb 11 2020 - 20:04, said:

I, and many others, have been asking for new maps for what seems like forever.  


What I was referring to is all those people that complained about premium ammo. The solutions are always delivered in manners that seldom resemble what players asked for.

 

Case in point, how many of you guys requested the "special slots" for xmas tanks, which basically disabled increased credit earnings for premium tanks? Players were clearly stockpiling too many credits with the stacked modifiers, and not working their way towards tier 10. Enter WG with a solution that nobody asked for, but attributing it to the requests of the player base.

 

As for the maps, even increasing the current pool of available maps would be nice. During the event they had to earn the MTLS, ALL of the maps were in rotation, why aren't they currently?

 

As usual, this isn't a slight against the NA WG crew as It's obvious these decisions are all made at a level well above their pay grade. 



TommyBuns #11 Posted Feb 12 2020 - 02:32

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 22492 battles
  • 909
  • Member since:
    12-31-2017

View Postmattts1, on Feb 11 2020 - 19:52, said:


I think you misunderstand the point of this post.. This is after the switch of the T6 vehicles to collector tanks so the accelerate crew training has presumably already been clicked.


So WG is returning to you any combat/free exp. you may have spent on the modules for this tank. Unfortunately in a way that requires you to buy/spend gold to utilize it. Anybody see a pattern yet?

 

Sorry for being extremely cynical, but the facts are the facts.


Edited by TommyBuns, Feb 12 2020 - 02:33.


mattts1 #12 Posted Feb 12 2020 - 02:42

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 8529 battles
  • 17
  • [ASD] ASD
  • Member since:
    10-01-2016

View PostTommyBuns, on Feb 11 2020 - 20:32, said:


So WG is returning to you any combat/free exp. you may have spent on the modules for this tank. Unfortunately in a way that requires you to buy/spend gold to utilize it. Anybody see a pattern yet?

 

Sorry for being extremely cynical, but the facts are the facts.


Considering this a experimental change at this point, informing them that that isn't the best way to compensate the player is good.. Its not set in stone what the final product with be in the end. Even if they don't give us any XP for the loss of the components, I just dont want XP just sitting there. I would much rather see 0 there if the only alternative is battle xp,


Edited by mattts1, Feb 12 2020 - 02:50.


TommyBuns #13 Posted Feb 12 2020 - 03:46

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 22492 battles
  • 909
  • Member since:
    12-31-2017

View Postmattts1, on Feb 11 2020 - 20:42, said:


Considering this a experimental change at this point, informing them that that isn't the best way to compensate the player is good.. Its not set in stone what the final product with be in the end. Even if they don't give us any XP for the loss of the components, I just dont want XP just sitting there. I would much rather see 0 there if the only alternative is battle xp,


Hopefully you're right and I'm wrong.I'd love to be wrong,  I just have a feeling most people are inevitably going to be unhappy with the changes, and wait till crew 2.0 gets here...lol. That's a whole other kettle of fish.



mattts1 #14 Posted Feb 12 2020 - 03:48

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 8529 battles
  • 17
  • [ASD] ASD
  • Member since:
    10-01-2016
Yeah, dumbing down the crew system just sounds like a terrible idea.. 




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users