Jump to content


- - - - -

HACKER

Tell Me What You Think

  • Please log in to reply
46 replies to this topic

d3athstr1k3 #21 Posted Jun 20 2020 - 02:30

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 11032 battles
  • 15
  • [-LNF-] -LNF-
  • Member since:
    06-06-2012
whats the date on the replay lul, i cant share because i dunno what hes talking about

Edited by d3athstr1k3, Jun 20 2020 - 02:31.


JDF #22 Posted Jun 20 2020 - 10:56

    Major

  • Players
  • 24636 battles
  • 2,208
  • [GFLC] GFLC
  • Member since:
    08-14-2011

View Postbake3020, on Jun 19 2020 - 05:03, said:


I agree but I am always being amazed.  I saw a tuber showing a video, the other day with lazer directional abilities the other day so he'd know when to poke and shoot.  A few years back I saw another posted a video that showed vegetation removal abilities, similar to what was going on in the other tank game where people were able to lower their settings and see through it to spot opponents.  So hackers are constantly improving and getting better at their jobs.

 

True, creators of illegal mods might improve their crap, but all these mods don't alter things on the server; only in the client of the user (aimbots, lasers and so on).

Like Domo already pointed out, a mod that would (e.g.) double the reloadspeed of a tank, would mean changing data on the server. That would mean the server was hacked. So far there is no reason to assume nor any evidence the server is or has been hacked.

 

Without a link to the replay we can only guess what happened. Perhaps OP got double tapped by 2 different tanks where the killshot came from the T-150? Or he got hit by a friendly T-150 and an enemy T-150 within these 2 seconds? Again, without a replay we can only guess.

 



SemanticChicanery #23 Posted Jun 20 2020 - 19:32

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 15510 battles
  • 486
  • [XG1] XG1
  • Member since:
    01-25-2015

View Postd3athstr1k3, on Jun 20 2020 - 02:30, said:

whats the date on the replay lul, i cant share because i dunno what hes talking about

 

This dude here might not have great stats but I remember his name, and I have been nuked by him more than once

 

OP IS TRASH WHY ARE WE DOING THIS AGAIN



Frye_Em_Up #24 Posted Aug 15 2020 - 20:56

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 46332 battles
  • 19
  • [DAMD] DAMD
  • Member since:
    06-15-2017

My comments sent into WG as a gripe about the game.  Please read and comment with CONSTRUCTIVE criticism or supporting claims if you believe my comments are justified.  Just want to make the game fair for everybody...as it seems very lopsided at the moment.  Below is the snippet from a ticket after I told WG I may just quit the game altogether.

 

 

As you try to rebut my comments, I also want to bring up a few other issues in the game that WG has not confirmed, that I and my fellow tankers have realized that occur in this WoT.

1)  Unium players are assigned a special profile that enable them better, more lax RNG to allow them better spotting, target hitting and damage harvesting capabilities.  This is like a carrot dangling tactic WG uses to get players to become addicted to the game to improve their stats and spend money to become better.  WG doesn't intend to actually give most of the player base those better RNG profiles they have given to many of the assigned unicums and some content contributes.

 

2)  If modifications are available and allowed in WoT, then why aren't sanctioned mods available via the WoT client?  Why are cheat or unsanctioned mods available and constantly updated for cheaters to install and use.  Why not make the sanctioned mods available in the client only with some kind of digital signature, as WG's approved status?  My guess is WG wants cheaters in the game.  WG needs cheaters because it keeps players thinking they can get better if they play incessantly, as if they were addicted, spend money on the new tanks, gold and other upgrades.  It's in WG's favor to allow cheaters in the game as WG has shown they do NOT intend to actually permanently ban cheaters because they are actually beneficial to WG's revenue source.

 

In conclusion, it seems the game IS in fact, rigged.  That WoT is presenting a game to players as free to play, then there are in-game purchases that allow for certain advantageous and attractive attributes and are constantly take them away. That some players, possibly unknowingly, have a profile assigned to them by WG that gives them an advantage in the WoT.  That WG actually has and wants to keep a stable of cheaters in the game for the benefit of incoming revenue.

 

I would like to have a complete and conclusive response to my comments from WG, be it the executives or the programmers themselves.

 


Edited by Frye_Em_Up, Sep 28 2020 - 04:39.


_Tsavo_ #25 Posted Aug 15 2020 - 22:48

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 49664 battles
  • 21,658
  • Member since:
    02-16-2011

View PostFrye_Em_Up, on Aug 15 2020 - 14:56, said:

 

1)  Unium players are assigned a special profile that enable them better, more lax RNG to allow them better spotting, target hitting and damage harvesting capabilities. 

 


Stopped reading right there. 

 

If you want constructive feedback, you gotta start at some sane, logical point, not in tin foil land



wooserloop #26 Posted Aug 16 2020 - 00:01

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 11169 battles
  • 181
  • Member since:
    08-13-2011
  I have never seen hackers or hacks used.  Heard and seen mods but never cared for them.  I'm just as plain vanilla as you get.  However almost everything is explainable and not some mystic hacker cheating in game.  Sometimes things are not displayed correctly till after a match. Sometimes lag spikes cause strange effects.  I've seen high ping instances where several shots can be fired or machine gunned even, only to realize I was actually disconnected and non of the shots actually fired.  ALso I would ultimately be very dead reconnecting. 

Frye_Em_Up #27 Posted Aug 16 2020 - 17:49

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 46332 battles
  • 19
  • [DAMD] DAMD
  • Member since:
    06-15-2017

View Post_Tsavo_, on Aug 15 2020 - 22:48, said:


Stopped reading right there. 

 

If you want constructive feedback, you gotta start at some sane, logical point, not in tin foil land

 

Well I take your tin foil hat and crumple it up and toss it in the garbage.  You're free to express your opinion, but don't troll if you don't agree.  I arrived at this conclusion after discussing this concept with others I play with and they agreed.  I'm just trying to reach others who may agree or who have had similar experiences.  If you don't, your comments don't hurt my feelings.


Edited by Frye_Em_Up, Aug 16 2020 - 17:59.


Frye_Em_Up #28 Posted Aug 16 2020 - 18:04

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 46332 battles
  • 19
  • [DAMD] DAMD
  • Member since:
    06-15-2017

View Postwooserloop, on Aug 16 2020 - 00:01, said:

 Sometimes things are not displayed correctly till after a match. Sometimes lag spikes cause strange effects.  I've seen high ping instances where several shots can be fired or machine gunned even, only to realize I was actually disconnected and non of the shots actually fired.  ALso I would ultimately be very dead reconnecting. 

It's not lag spikes or anything like that.  It's the actual profile in the game that WG may have created a kind of hierarchy given players abilities to play the game.  It's as if there's some kind of hidden reward system/layer behind the ranking/WN8 or similar.  Kind of like these players are promoters for the game to dangle carrots in front of other players to show them how good they could be if they put in the time and money to become as good as them.  With this unknown layer in the game, WG stands to generate more profit.  With that said, and the profit potential available, do you think WG cares if the game is actually fair?


Edited by Frye_Em_Up, Aug 16 2020 - 18:05.


GeorgePreddy #29 Posted Aug 16 2020 - 18:18

    Major

  • Players
  • 14680 battles
  • 16,359
  • Member since:
    04-11-2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



VooDooKobra #30 Posted Aug 16 2020 - 18:53

    Major

  • Players
  • 10326 battles
  • 7,303
  • [W-UN2] W-UN2
  • Member since:
    04-23-2011

View PostFrye_Em_Up, on Aug 15 2020 - 12:56, said:

My comments sent into WG as a gripe about the game.  Please read and comment with CONSTRUCTIVE criticism or supporting claims if you believe my comments are justified.  Just want to make the game fair for everybody...as it seems very lopsided at the moment.  Below is the snippet from a ticket after I told WG I may just quit the game altogether.

 

 

As you try to rebut my comments, I also want to bring up a few other issues in the game that WG has not confirmed, that I and my fellow tankers have realized that occur in this WoT.

1)  Unium players are assigned a special profile that enable them better, more lax RNG to allow them better spotting, target hitting and damage harvesting capabilities.  This is like a carrot dangling tactic WG uses to get players to become addicted to the game to improve their stats and spend money to become better.  WG doesn't intend to actually give most of the player base those better RNG profiles they have given to many of the assigned unicums and some content contributes.

 

2)  If modifications are available and allowed in WoT, then why aren't sanctioned mods available via the WoT client?  Why are cheat or unsanctioned mods available and constantly updated for cheaters to install and use.  Why not make the sanctioned mods available in the client only with some kind of digital signature, as WG's approved status?  My guess is WG wants cheaters in the game.  WG needs cheaters because it keeps players thinking they can get better if they play incessantly, as if they were addicted, spend money on the new tanks, gold and other upgrades.  It's in WG's favor to allow cheaters in the game as WG has shown they do NOT intend to actually permanently ban cheaters because they are actually beneficial to WG's revenue source.

 

In conclusion, it seems the game IS in fact, rigged.  That WoT is presenting a game to players as free to play, then there are in-game purchases that allow for certain advantageous and attractive attributes and are constantly take them away. That some players, possibly unknowingly, have a profile assigned to them by WG that gives them an advantage in the WoT.  That WG actually has and wants to keep a stable of cheaters in the game for the benefit of incoming revenue.

 

I would like to have a complete and conclusive response to my comments from WG, be it the executives or the programmers themselves.

 

if you want to have a constructive discussion you will need to supply the data you gathered to form your theory, also can you back any of that up with facts instead of feels?

 

1. why would good players need a special profile to be good if they are already playing at a higher level?  there really is no benefit to this to the player especially when it has been proven that spending money does not make a player good.  also how does WG decide who gets this benefit and who doesnt? 

 

2. because those who make the cheat mods regardless of the game will always be upgrading their product since there will always be those who are so insecure about their game performance they feel they cant keep up with the good players unless they cheat.  sad thing is i am not sure how much more cheats in this game really translate to a better player.  while an aim bot may put the crosshairs on the tank it doesnt bypass rng, a bad player will still be a bad player but with a crutch.  also how do you feel they do not intent to ban cheaters when every time they do a wave you get multiple posts from people complaining they got banned?  

 

in conclusion the game has never been proven to actually been rigged, if by take them away you are talking about rebalancing op tanks then every game is guilty of balancing op items in their games.  i would still like to see your proof of a special profile as well that WG wants cheaters to stay



Burning_Haggis #31 Posted Aug 20 2020 - 07:09

    Major

  • Players
  • 49573 battles
  • 2,627
  • [CLASS] CLASS
  • Member since:
    04-09-2013

View PostFrye_Em_Up, on Aug 16 2020 - 11:04, said:

It's not lag spikes or anything like that.  It's the actual profile in the game that WG may have created a kind of hierarchy given players abilities to play the game.  It's as if there's some kind of hidden reward system/layer behind the ranking/WN8 or similar.  Kind of like these players are promoters for the game to dangle carrots in front of other players to show them how good they could be if they put in the time and money to become as good as them.  With this unknown layer in the game, WG stands to generate more profit.  With that said, and the profit potential available, do you think WG cares if the game is actually fair?

Makes my head hurt.

 

Sad part is I have heard many of these guys in TS going on about special accounts.   

 

 Holy crap, how the hell do you bash your head on the desktop for 41,000 games and still believe this sort of stuff?   



DRAGONFIRE_Sr #32 Posted Aug 20 2020 - 13:21

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 31876 battles
  • 446
  • [KS] KS
  • Member since:
    05-01-2011

Block Quote

 1)  Unium players are assigned a special profile that enable them better, more lax RNG to allow them better spotting, target hitting and damage harvesting capabilities.  This is like a carrot dangling tactic WG uses to get players to become addicted to the game to improve their stats and spend money to become better.  WG doesn't intend to actually give most of the player base those better RNG profiles they have given to many of the assigned unicums and some content contributes.

 There are no "Special profiles" assigned to the unicum players, what you will find, are well trained crews (Up to 9 skills...I think) in their tanks, and a ton of "stick time" playing this game. A good comparison would be that ANYONE can grab a pair of drumsticks and beat on a set of drums, but very few will be able to beat on them like Led Zeppelin's John Bonham, or Buddy Rich!!

 

Block Quote

 My guess is WG wants cheaters in the game.  WG needs cheaters because it keeps players thinking they can get better if they play incessantly, as if they were addicted, spend money on the new tanks, gold and other upgrades.  It's in WG's favor to allow cheaters in the game as WG has shown they do NOT intend to actually permanently ban cheaters because they are actually beneficial to WG's revenue source.

 While there are undoubtedly cheaters in the game, I really doubt WG would sanction them to increase the revenue stream! What would one cheater's cash be, when compared to the cash a non cheating player puts into the game? One cheater would end up running off many players that cant stand cheaters, thereby decreasing the revenue that WG has coming in.

 

Block Quote

 2)  If modifications are available and allowed in WoT, then why aren't sanctioned mods available via the WoT client?  Why are cheat or unsanctioned mods available and constantly updated for cheaters to install and use.  Why not make the sanctioned mods available in the client only with some kind of digital signature, as WG's approved status?

 There are WoT "approved" mods! You can find the links to them in the WoT forums!>>> http://forum.worldof...ks-mods-addons/ <<< I recommend Aslians mod packs.

 

Block Quote

 That WoT is presenting a game to players as free to play, then there are in-game purchases that allow for certain advantageous and attractive attributes and are constantly take them away. That some players, possibly unknowingly, have a profile assigned to them by WG that gives them an advantage in the WoT.

Yes WoT is F2P, and if you wish to advance faster in the game, you can spend real money that can help. None of it though, will make you shoot faster, see better, or be harder to hit by enemy shots...aside from the crew skills, and the equipment you choose to mount in your tanks. I do have to agree with one point you made here though, that is with the changing of attributes, this new equipment 2.0 is a pain to adjust all of my tanks to! The nerfs and buffs to tanks both new and old is a pain as well! You can count on that part never changing, as the "power creep" is meant as a way to encourage us all, to play and research the new lines to get to the new "META" tanks in the game.

 

If you look at my sig below, you may notice that I never have been more than an average player, and after a long break from playing, I'm not even close to that any more!

 



Der_Freischutz #33 Posted Aug 21 2020 - 01:30

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 31534 battles
  • 16
  • Member since:
    03-14-2012

View PostGWyatt, on Jun 18 2020 - 19:08, said:

 

As always, remove the players name if you would like to continue using the forum as it is against the rules to post it here.

 

EDIT: I failed to notice that my quote now contains the names I suggested be removed, fixed.

 

How about you guys just start enforcing rules... instead of allowing bots? Ooooh... I dunno, a simple line of code picking out identical IPs might work, or IPs that are too similar to be coincidence? MAKE WOT GREAT AGAIN! No more money from me, taking a hard stand against this BS after playing regularly for 10yrs (beta player here).

 

Time to start voting with my money...and if I'm violating any of your forum policies, then so be it as well. I'm also against socialism and censorship of differential opinions.

 

Thank you... Your friendly JOHNS HOPKINS GRAD!



VooDooKobra #34 Posted Aug 21 2020 - 02:55

    Major

  • Players
  • 10326 battles
  • 7,303
  • [W-UN2] W-UN2
  • Member since:
    04-23-2011

View PostDer_Freischutz, on Aug 20 2020 - 17:30, said:

 

How about you guys just start enforcing rules... instead of allowing bots? Ooooh... I dunno, a simple line of code picking out identical IPs might work, or IPs that are too similar to be coincidence? MAKE WOT GREAT AGAIN! No more money from me, taking a hard stand against this BS after playing regularly for 10yrs (beta player here).

 

Time to start voting with my money...and if I'm violating any of your forum policies, then so be it as well. I'm also against socialism and censorship of differential opinions.

 

Thank you... Your friendly JOHNS HOPKINS GRAD!

so how do you keep it from banning people playing the same game in the same house going through a home network?   When you are connected to a home network, either on wifi or by cable, you connect via your internet router. This router has a single public IP address, this is the only IP address that is visible to any system outside of your home network.  When you have multiple devices on the same home network they all connect out to the internet with the same public IP address. The internal IP address you have is hidden from the outside world.

 

It has been my experience on the forums that people do not generally get their posts edited because of what they say unless it violates the forums rules, also it seems to come down to how the idea is stated more than the idea itself.    then there is the comment on socialism, i am not really sure how that even applied because the way the game is set up seems more like capitalism.  through mutual contract people pay money to get either premium time, tanks, other stuff from the store for a set amount of money.  that is the fundamental principle of capitalism



Frye_Em_Up #35 Posted Aug 24 2020 - 17:44

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 46332 battles
  • 19
  • [DAMD] DAMD
  • Member since:
    06-15-2017

View PostDRAGONFIRE_Sr, on Aug 20 2020 - 13:21, said:

1. There are no "Special profiles" assigned to the unicum players, what you will find, are well trained crews (Up to 9 skills...I think) in their tanks, and a ton of "stick time" playing this game. A good comparison would be that ANYONE can grab a pair of drumsticks and beat on a set of drums, but very few will be able to beat on them like Led Zeppelin's John Bonham, or Buddy Rich!!

 

2. While there are undoubtedly cheaters in the game, I really doubt WG would sanction them to increase the revenue stream! What would one cheater's cash be, when compared to the cash a non cheating player puts into the game? One cheater would end up running off many players that cant stand cheaters, thereby decreasing the revenue that WG has coming in.

 

3. There are WoT "approved" mods! You can find the links to them in the WoT forums!>>> http://forum.worldof...ks-mods-addons/ <<< I recommend Aslians mod packs.

 

4. Yes WoT is F2P, and if you wish to advance faster in the game, you can spend real money that can help. None of it though, will make you shoot faster, see better, or be harder to hit by enemy shots...aside from the crew skills, and the equipment you choose to mount in your tanks. I do have to agree with one point you made here though, that is with the changing of attributes, this new equipment 2.0 is a pain to adjust all of my tanks to! The nerfs and buffs to tanks both new and old is a pain as well! You can count on that part never changing, as the "power creep" is meant as a way to encourage us all, to play and research the new lines to get to the new "META" tanks in the game.

 

If you look at my sig below, you may notice that I never have been more than an average player, and after a long break from playing, I'm not even close to that any more!

 

I appreciate your feedback and willingness to debate the topics I've presented.

 

1.  How do you know there are no "special profiles" in existance?  Did you make the game?  Were you in any way involved in it's development and know of it's complete workings?  Everybody certainly starts out with the same white canvas.  What it becomes later is where the grey area begins.  I believe there's a lot WG is not telling payers about the other working parts of the game.

 

2.  Why wouldn't they?  Certainly seems like they can't and won't get rid of cheaters.  I think the percentage of cheaters has never been greater.  What you're missing in what I wrote earlier is WG is just turning a blind eye to cheating.  If they can have honest players believe that they can accomplish what cheaters are doing, oblivious to fact that it is cheating, then why would they close the door on that opportunity where a honest, novice/naive player believes he must buy the latest premium or gold in efforts to improve or compensate?  It may not even be to compensate...but he psychology goes something like this: 'Lose repeatedly.  There's nothing else I like to play.  I'm already invested in this game.  Why not buy a new premium to distract myself from the losses and feel good about myself?'

 

3.  Yes, well aware of the sanctioned mods.  You didn't read or understand the full context of my comment.  In the game client, I am not able to install mods or a mod pack.  They are external to the client software itself.  Therefore they are added on as external software once out of game client.  So are mods that are not sanctioned.  They install the same way.  Why does WG not bring the sanctioned mod list to be able to browse and install in the game client itself???? WG made a page of what mods are sanctioned on their own site, why not bring it into the client it self!??!?!?  That's what I'm proposing.  Those sanctioned mods would have to be manually approved to exist in the in-client list and unsanctioned mods would no longer be able to be installed or used in WoT.  Simple right?  Tell that to WG.  They'll tell you some BS nonsense that it can't be done, when a seasoned developer will disagree.

 

4.  The "Power Creep" concept is just an avenue to keep players spending to keep up with the Jones's....Still have that IS-6B in my garage...haven't played it in.... forever.  I'm all for WG making money if they are actually genuine about what product they are selling.  It's not that I think WG should not make money.  There would be no game if they weren't allowed to make money.  But to change the game dynamics and temporarily introduce new vehicles that out preform others to drive up sales, only to later "rebalance" them so the fit into the current game meta....that destroys the idea that Power Creep exists in the first place.  You bought the vehicle when it was introduced with those attributes, it should exist as is in the game, NO MATTER WHAT.



GeorgePreddy #36 Posted Aug 24 2020 - 20:03

    Major

  • Players
  • 14680 battles
  • 16,359
  • Member since:
    04-11-2013

1. There's never been one shred of actual hard evidence that any individuals are treated specially by WG as far as getting better MM or Game Mechanics, etc. I'll go with Ocham's Razor on this one... which is, essentially that;  In the absence of good evidence to the contrary, the simplest explanation is usually the correct one.

 

2. You have no proof whatsoever that WG is "just turning a blind eye to cheating"... they say they are catching cheaters and banning them consistently, and you don't know if they are or not. So, it's a matter of "he said, she said". I tend to believe WG over your conspiracy theory.

 

3. WG did not develop those mods and therefore do not own the rights to them. When you go thru, say, Aslain for a mod... he gets paid by his advertisers.

 

4. WG does not nerf Premium tanks and haven't for a very long time, not since the great SP refund debacle. There is nothing to keep them from introducing slightly better tanks over time, which is absolutely power creep... but, again, there is nothing to keep them from doing it when, and as, they please.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



VooDooKobra #37 Posted Aug 24 2020 - 20:16

    Major

  • Players
  • 10326 battles
  • 7,303
  • [W-UN2] W-UN2
  • Member since:
    04-23-2011

View PostFrye_Em_Up, on Aug 24 2020 - 09:44, said:

I appreciate your feedback and willingness to debate the topics I've presented.

 

1.  How do you know there are no "special profiles" in existance?  Did you make the game?  Were you in any way involved in it's development and know of it's complete workings?  Everybody certainly starts out with the same white canvas.  What it becomes later is where the grey area begins.  I believe there's a lot WG is not telling payers about the other working parts of the game.

 

2.  Why wouldn't they?  Certainly seems like they can't and won't get rid of cheaters.  I think the percentage of cheaters has never been greater.  What you're missing in what I wrote earlier is WG is just turning a blind eye to cheating.  If they can have honest players believe that they can accomplish what cheaters are doing, oblivious to fact that it is cheating, then why would they close the door on that opportunity where a honest, novice/naive player believes he must buy the latest premium or gold in efforts to improve or compensate?  It may not even be to compensate...but he psychology goes something like this: 'Lose repeatedly.  There's nothing else I like to play.  I'm already invested in this game.  Why not buy a new premium to distract myself from the losses and feel good about myself?'

 

3.  Yes, well aware of the sanctioned mods.  You didn't read or understand the full context of my comment.  In the game client, I am not able to install mods or a mod pack.  They are external to the client software itself.  Therefore they are added on as external software once out of game client.  So are mods that are not sanctioned.  They install the same way.  Why does WG not bring the sanctioned mod list to be able to browse and install in the game client itself???? WG made a page of what mods are sanctioned on their own site, why not bring it into the client it self!??!?!?  That's what I'm proposing.  Those sanctioned mods would have to be manually approved to exist in the in-client list and unsanctioned mods would no longer be able to be installed or used in WoT.  Simple right?  Tell that to WG.  They'll tell you some BS nonsense that it can't be done, when a seasoned developer will disagree.

 

4.  The "Power Creep" concept is just an avenue to keep players spending to keep up with the Jones's....Still have that IS-6B in my garage...haven't played it in.... forever.  I'm all for WG making money if they are actually genuine about what product they are selling.  It's not that I think WG should not make money.  There would be no game if they weren't allowed to make money.  But to change the game dynamics and temporarily introduce new vehicles that out preform others to drive up sales, only to later "rebalance" them so the fit into the current game meta....that destroys the idea that Power Creep exists in the first place.  You bought the vehicle when it was introduced with those attributes, it should exist as is in the game, NO MATTER WHAT.

1. that question could also apply to you thinking there are special profilesDid you make the game?  Were you in any way involved in it's development and know of it's complete workings?

 

2.on what are you basing they turn a blind eye to cheaters? also on what are you basing your claim on the % of cheaters? 

 

3.  most games that allow mods work the way you describe, i use a fallout 4 mod it is external so not sure what you really want here.  

 

4. how many premium vehicles have WG nerfed since the super P? if anything they have buffed premium vehicles.  buffing older vehicles is not a bad thing


Edited by VooDooKobra, Aug 24 2020 - 20:17.


Frye_Em_Up #38 Posted Aug 26 2020 - 18:43

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 46332 battles
  • 19
  • [DAMD] DAMD
  • Member since:
    06-15-2017

View PostVooDooKobra, on Aug 24 2020 - 20:16, said:

1. that question could also apply to you thinking there are special profilesDid you make the game?  Were you in any way involved in it's development and know of it's complete workings?

 

2.on what are you basing they turn a blind eye to cheaters? also on what are you basing your claim on the % of cheaters? 

 

3.  most games that allow mods work the way you describe, i use a fallout 4 mod it is external so not sure what you really want here.  

 

4. how many premium vehicles have WG nerfed since the super P? if anything they have buffed premium vehicles.  buffing older vehicles is not a bad thing


1. There are special account's that content contributes and other notables have.

 

2. Where's the list of banned accounts?  That's proof, nothing else will do.  Who's to say WG isn't banning known cheaters because they are instrumental to bolstering revenue?  Prove to me they are indeed banning accounts, just saying so is not proof.  I want a list of names and SR of those banned accounts and the specific violations.

 

3.What I'm hinting at is that anybody who chooses to use mods, should be able to get them ONLY from the WoT game client.  Someone else who answered/countered my concern stated that said mod dev's get paid for or the ads they have on their site when you visit to download the mods. That's not a good enough reason.  WG needs to make the game airtight to discourage and completely eliminate cheat/unsanctioned mods.  It's only fair to honest players to treat the game as such.

 

4. WG has recently nerfed the Progetto 46.  In the past they also 'GHOST' nerfed the EBR 75 FL 10.  It does not play/move the same as when I bought it.  A few whiners complain that it's too fast, doesn't slow down when shot, bounces too many shots, etc...I've managed to hit a lot of EBR's and have also been hit lots in my EBR's prior to the extensive nerfs.  Too many cry babies play the game and when they don't do the damage they want they complain like little girls who have an itchy bum from not wiping properly.

 

They buffed the IS-6/B because it was a crap tank that used to be good.  Nobody plays it anymore because it can't pen anything.  I remember having fantastic battles in my IS-6B and now its just a slow marshmallow with a pee shooter for a gun.  They buffed it because they don't want people to think that they have players on a payment treadmill, which they obviously do.  And after the buff, it's still a craptank.



VooDooKobra #39 Posted Aug 26 2020 - 19:51

    Major

  • Players
  • 10326 battles
  • 7,303
  • [W-UN2] W-UN2
  • Member since:
    04-23-2011

View PostFrye_Em_Up, on Aug 26 2020 - 10:43, said:


1. There are special account's that content contributes and other notables have.

 

2. Where's the list of banned accounts?  That's proof, nothing else will do.  Who's to say WG isn't banning known cheaters because they are instrumental to bolstering revenue?  Prove to me they are indeed banning accounts, just saying so is not proof.  I want a list of names and SR of those banned accounts and the specific violations.

 

3.What I'm hinting at is that anybody who chooses to use mods, should be able to get them ONLY from the WoT game client.  Someone else who answered/countered my concern stated that said mod dev's get paid for or the ads they have on their site when you visit to download the mods. That's not a good enough reason.  WG needs to make the game airtight to discourage and completely eliminate cheat/unsanctioned mods.  It's only fair to honest players to treat the game as such.

 

4. WG has recently nerfed the Progetto 46.  In the past they also 'GHOST' nerfed the EBR 75 FL 10.  It does not play/move the same as when I bought it.  A few whiners complain that it's too fast, doesn't slow down when shot, bounces too many shots, etc...I've managed to hit a lot of EBR's and have also been hit lots in my EBR's prior to the extensive nerfs.  Too many cry babies play the game and when they don't do the damage they want they complain like little girls who have an itchy bum from not wiping properly.

 

They buffed the IS-6/B because it was a crap tank that used to be good.  Nobody plays it anymore because it can't pen anything.  I remember having fantastic battles in my IS-6B and now its just a slow marshmallow with a pee shooter for a gun.  They buffed it because they don't want people to think that they have players on a payment treadmill, which they obviously do.  And after the buff, it's still a craptank.

1. prove it and feels dont count

2. and yet every time there is a wave of bans there is also posts of people complaining they got banned. 

3.are you talking a loading system inside the client or the mods pre installed in the client?  if it is the second i see issues with devolpers not being on staff having the ability to keep up with patches.  having a mod not work properly because the mod dev hasnt updated it until after the patch may cause crashes

4. tbh the prog premium isnt really a nerf they buffed the reload time/rof so the numbers didnt change between the old version having the rammer and the new version not having it.  the fact the numbers didnt change and thet you can use a different piece of equipment to me is a buff, also i try not to believe ghost nerf claims unless actual proof is provided.  feels aint proof

 

as for the IS6 doesnt it have pref MM, didnt people lose their minds when WG was talking about major buffs in exchange for that pref MM?  


Edited by VooDooKobra, Aug 26 2020 - 21:10.


Frye_Em_Up #40 Posted Aug 27 2020 - 19:30

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 46332 battles
  • 19
  • [DAMD] DAMD
  • Member since:
    06-15-2017

View PostVooDooKobra, on Aug 26 2020 - 19:51, said:

1. prove it and feels dont count

2. and yet every time there is a wave of bans there is also posts of people complaining they got banned. 

3.are you talking a loading system inside the client or the mods pre installed in the client?  if it is the second i see issues with devolpers not being on staff having the ability to keep up with patches.  having a mod not work properly because the mod dev hasnt updated it until after the patch may cause crashes

4. tbh the prog premium isnt really a nerf they buffed the reload time/rof so the numbers didnt change between the old version having the rammer and the new version not having it.  the fact the numbers didnt change and thet you can use a different piece of equipment to me is a buff, also i try not to believe ghost nerf claims unless actual proof is provided.  feels aint proof

 

as for the IS6 doesnt it have pref MM, didnt people lose their minds when WG was talking about major buffs in exchange for that pref MM?  


1.  I didn't post my comment based on proof of what I had thought was factual.  My guess is you are attempting to take my post out of context or bait me into making claims I never intended to make.  I posted it on my suspicion that WG was doing the things in my original post.  I never claimed any of these things were factual, but was reaching out the the community at large via this forum to see if other agree.  That's all.  If you don't agree, I don't want to hear from you.  I want to see if my suspicions are shared among the community members and to what degree.  And if there is indeed evidence & facts that other have gathered and are willing to share.

 

2.  People whom were banned, complaining...where are they?  I've yet to see these complaints.  Who's to say it's not fake posts WG staff had put together to make the bans seem real???  There's many opportunities and things WG can do and I believe they will go to great lengths to deceive their player base.  They are after all....Russian!

 

3.  This is about the game...not the developers.  Who cares.  I use Solo's mod pack and it is always behind a few days when WG releases updates.  I have used Aslain's, however I prefer Solo's and am willing to wait for the updated mod pack to come out rather than switching to some other developer.

 

"having a mod not work properly because the mod dev hasnt updated it until after the patch may cause crashes"

 

  What a BS statement...they can certainly have in client button or something that takes you to the page, that is only accessed via the client for players rather than visiting the page itself.  Very much like Tank Rewards (TR) notifies you of a reward available, you click on the notification in the WoT client and it takes you directly to the TR page already signed in, ready for you to choose your reward.  Don't tell me it can't be done.  It's been done in every combination and permutation under the sun already.  No need to make excuses for WG's lack of vision and foresight that has only fostered cheating and very well hidden their deception.







Also tagged with Tell Me What You Think

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users