Jump to content


Incoming! Common Test 1.10 part 3 is now live

KRZY CT test common test check it out

  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

KRZYBooP #1 Posted Jul 23 2020 - 22:35

    Community Coordinator

  • Administrator
  • 4628 battles
  • 1,016
  • [WGA] WGA
  • Member since:
    08-10-2015

Howdy Boom Jockeys!

 

Bunches and bunches of changes for everyone to check out on the third test for 1.10. 

 

More information can be found HERE.



DrWho_ #2 Posted Jul 23 2020 - 23:08

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 32781 battles
  • 3,928
  • [B-S-B] B-S-B
  • Member since:
    07-29-2017
Binocs and camo net is still complex equipment and will cost 10 gold to demount, thx for listening to your customers

Einzelganger7 #3 Posted Jul 23 2020 - 23:17

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 9835 battles
  • 315
  • [WOLFD] WOLFD
  • Member since:
    09-12-2017

View PostDrWho_, on Jul 23 2020 - 16:08, said:

Binocs and camo net is still complex equipment and will cost 10 gold to demount, thx for listening to your customers


Exactly what I was going to say. Also, removing rammer from tier 2-4 but only buffing DPM of premiums and not doing the same with the Tech tree ones? I do not play such tiers but that is too low because the seal clubber premiums will remain with the same performance but all tier 2-4 tech tree tanks will get a DPM nerf.



Badkarma #4 Posted Jul 23 2020 - 23:38

    Captain

  • Players
  • 32257 battles
  • 1,458
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011

View PostDrWho_, on Jul 23 2020 - 23:08, said:

Binocs and camo net is still complex equipment and will cost 10 gold to demount, thx for listening to your customers

Anybody who thought these equipment changes wouldn't be revised, or that the Italian tech tree wouldn't get hosed, or that the Wheelibolas would get a meaningful nerf or that the 430U would get a meaningful nerf or....you see where i'm going with this right?



BaconMeLoveIt #5 Posted Jul 23 2020 - 23:51

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 15109 battles
  • 2,448
  • [VX] VX
  • Member since:
    06-10-2016

Block Quote

 

U.K.

AC 1 Sentinel

  • Changed the reload time from 2.3 to 2.07 s

Sexton I

  • Changed the reload time from 12 to 10.8 s

U.S.S.R.

T-28E with F-30

  • Changed the reload time from 6.1 to 5.49 s

T-29

  • Changed the reload time from 5.2 to 4.68 s

SU-76I

  • Changed the reload time from 4.3 to 3.87 s

A-32

  • Changed the reload time from 4.57 to 4.1 s

 

That's A LOT of low tier Soviet tanks being buffed.

ratpak #6 Posted Jul 24 2020 - 00:03

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 29675 battles
  • 2,587
  • [DHO-X] DHO-X
  • Member since:
    11-24-2010

if it takes multi millions of credits and a ton of gold to redo everything I'm walking. even after 10yrs and thousands of dollars spent on this game.  The player base is horrible and the game in no way near as fun as it used to be..

It's just not worth the grind to do it.



rockbutcher #7 Posted Jul 24 2020 - 00:18

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 24159 battles
  • 2,028
  • [T-Y-R] T-Y-R
  • Member since:
    03-06-2015

View Postratpak, on Jul 23 2020 - 18:03, said:

if it takes multi millions of credits and a ton of gold to redo everything I'm walking. even after 10yrs and thousands of dollars spent on this game.  The player base is horrible and the game in no way near as fun as it used to be..

It's just not worth the grind to do it.

Agreed.



omi5cron #8 Posted Jul 24 2020 - 00:31

    Major

  • Players
  • 28199 battles
  • 6,762
  • [THUGZ] THUGZ
  • Member since:
    04-01-2013
Dr Who has it right..."Binocs and camo net is still complex equipment and will cost 10 gold to demount". change that ONE thing and i would be able to accept this...THING...which absolutely no one ASKED for.

GealicWolf #9 Posted Jul 24 2020 - 00:40

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 10682 battles
  • 69
  • [ROCKY] ROCKY
  • Member since:
    01-22-2017

View PostBaconMeLoveIt, on Jul 23 2020 - 23:51, said:

 

That's A LOT of low tier Soviet tanks being buffed.

Did we really expect anything less?

 



EdibleEmpire #10 Posted Jul 24 2020 - 00:44

    Captain

  • Beta Testers
  • 28300 battles
  • 1,477
  • [THREW] THREW
  • Member since:
    09-08-2010

I don't understand why they insist on pushing Equipment 2.0 through. Did they even listen to the feedback or did they automatically dismiss it?

 

Also the Progetto 65 nerfs are counterproductive. The reload nerf? Sure. The gun handling nerf? LOL WHAT? The problem with the tank was the reload and the troll armor. One is getting solved but the second part of the nerf is unnecessary and dangerous.

 



RauASTER #11 Posted Jul 24 2020 - 00:51

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 37809 battles
  • 32
  • Member since:
    02-14-2013

View PostPatientRelaxedPerson, on Jul 24 2020 - 00:44, said:

Also the Progetto 65 nerfs are counterproductive. The reload nerf? Sure. The gun handling nerf? LOL WHAT? The problem with the tank was the reload and the troll armor. One is getting solved but the second part of the nerf is unnecessary and dangerous.

  

It's not russian, so nerfing it slightly to make it balanced is out of the question 



IceOtter #12 Posted Jul 24 2020 - 04:30

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 64303 battles
  • 469
  • [BE] BE
  • Member since:
    06-24-2012

View PostBaconMeLoveIt, on Jul 23 2020 - 16:51, said:

 

That's A LOT of low tier Soviet tanks being buffed.

 

Here is the really crazy thing:  they don't even sell the SU-76l anymore after they put it up for sale at 2am for 1/2 hour so their Russian cronies could buy it - because they said it broke low tier matchmaking.  And they're giving it a HUGE reload buff.  Because it's broken and it needs to be WAY more broken.  Because Wargaming is legit concerned about... well... anything really.  They just look at us with their dead eyes as the pity meter on the wall behind them reads ZERO.



Riverie #13 Posted Jul 24 2020 - 11:46

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 12015 battles
  • 3
  • [RHEYN] RHEYN
  • Member since:
    07-22-2016

View PostPatientRelaxedPerson, on Jul 23 2020 - 20:44, said:

Did they even listen to the feedback or did they automatically dismiss it?

They definitely doesn't listen to feedback. This new update is looking so trash. Buffing premiums tanks, nerfing line tanks, introducing a potentially game breaking equipment system, and forgetting what people have asked for years, ammo rabalance.


Edited by Riverie, Jul 24 2020 - 11:47.


SpectreHD #14 Posted Jul 24 2020 - 11:56

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 17146 battles
  • 17,687
  • [TT] TT
  • Member since:
    07-12-2010
No further nerfs to the armour/"weakspot" of the 430U. Penetrable with standard ammo and armour equivalent to the E-50M my [edited].

Edited by SpectreHD, Jul 24 2020 - 11:56.


KiltedAmerican #15 Posted Jul 24 2020 - 13:50

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 0 battles
  • 320
  • Member since:
    01-12-2020

View PostRiverie, on Jul 24 2020 - 05:46, said:

They definitely doesn't listen to feedback. This new update is looking so trash. Buffing premiums tanks, nerfing line tanks, introducing a potentially game breaking equipment system, and forgetting what people have asked for years, ammo rebalance.

 

Don't forget Crew 2.0 ....

 

All of it together is going to be one big damned Charlie Foxtrot.


Edited by KiltedAmerican, Jul 24 2020 - 16:44.


docroberts #16 Posted Jul 24 2020 - 14:56

    Captain

  • Players
  • 21088 battles
  • 1,515
  • [TONKX] TONKX
  • Member since:
    03-08-2013

View Postratpak, on Jul 23 2020 - 17:03, said:

if it takes multi millions of credits and a ton of gold to redo everything I'm walking. even after 10yrs and thousands of dollars spent on this game.  The player base is horrible and the game in no way near as fun as it used to be..

It's just not worth the grind to do it.

It never mattered to them , Ever . They keep squeezing what little bit they can out of ppl and then they post discussions to gather what ppl think so it makes it look like they care what we think .  In the end they will keep changing thing , change the EULA to suite any arguments . Break any and all promises . It's very depressing to watch your WN8 fall through the floor and know you cant make a difference in the lop sided teams you keep getting . Not like the days of old , team battles of KV1S and Tanks you wanted to grind to and armor that mattered . Spam AP and HE because that's all we had . They don't care and will continue to throw a coat of whitewash over the same board just to make it look like they improved things . 



enya1ius #17 Posted Jul 24 2020 - 16:22

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 33637 battles
  • 224
  • Member since:
    01-18-2013

I am struggling to think of a worse patch. I dont know a single soul that is looking forward to any "feature" they are adding, the endless nerfs to tech tree tanks and the terrible arguments for buffing the premium tanks. if all the tech tree tanks are nerfed it isnt a nerf to the premium tank. the low tier tanks would be on par with others at the tier so why buff them. when they sell the tanks they come with zero equipment and you could run them like that if you chose, there is nothing saying you have to put on a rammer. so the low tiers and the progetto 46 are getting zero nerfs. the ebr you could make an arguement is the only one getting a nerf but i guess they are stating that rather than rebalance and make a healthy game its just a whoopsie. but just like the 252 and e25 we all know they will continue to sell the ebr even after they state they are broken. this game get more and more depressing each year. I really need to get over the sunken cost fallacy and move on. 

 



JakeTheMystic #18 Posted Jul 25 2020 - 01:26

    Major

  • Players
  • 26495 battles
  • 3,687
  • [TRY] TRY
  • Member since:
    12-30-2011
Any plans to add the report feature for those who are teaming in the steel hunt mode? I recall last time that reports were only dealt with through support if the user happened to be streaming and had settings to save the vod. So will there are least be replays or are the cheaters still free to team up and roll solo matches? 

mrmojo #19 Posted Jul 25 2020 - 01:44

    Major

  • Players
  • 20503 battles
  • 3,020
  • [-LEG-] -LEG-
  • Member since:
    07-24-2011
Rubicon 2.0

KiltedAmerican #20 Posted Jul 25 2020 - 02:35

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 0 battles
  • 320
  • Member since:
    01-12-2020

View Postenya1ius, on Jul 24 2020 - 10:22, said:

(1) ... they will continue to sell the ebr even after they state they are broken.

(2) ... this game get more and more depressing each year. I really need to get over the sunken cost fallacy and move on. 

 

(1) Attrition ... I remember when tanks like the Cromwell and Type 59 flooded the MM for months after release, often filling the entire line-up. But, over time, they thinned-out. Through constant data collection, WG  probably has a pretty good idea of how many of each vehicle is active during any given week, and can make future projections based on the same data across several weeks, or an entire year.

 

(2) Welcome to the club ... apathy is the pathway to "Attrition" ...


Edited by KiltedAmerican, Jul 30 2020 - 14:03.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users