Jump to content


Leave the crew system alone and fix your MM first!

Crew system Matchmaking MM

  • Please log in to reply
44 replies to this topic

PJMC #21 Posted Dec 16 2020 - 02:29

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 29392 battles
  • 469
  • [2AFU] 2AFU
  • Member since:
    10-15-2013

View Postcoconut2011, on Dec 15 2020 - 16:44, said:

It should be: don't touch crew and MM.

 

Add more unique 3D styles if you really want money.

 

Because we  like to see your oversized AA gun silhouette before you crest a ridgeline...



2MOEJOE #22 Posted Dec 16 2020 - 02:32

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 6937 battles
  • 1,763
  • [OPIC] OPIC
  • Member since:
    11-28-2017
What do you care are you trolling?F@%k with my crews and I'm outa here because  this is the dumbest thing WGs has thought  of.

Edited by 2MOEJOE, Dec 16 2020 - 02:32.


Death_on_2_Treads #23 Posted Dec 16 2020 - 02:58

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 20403 battles
  • 70
  • [NYK] NYK
  • Member since:
    04-04-2014

View PostGeoMonster, on Dec 15 2020 - 18:05, said:

 

I guess for someone like yourself that loves to low tier seal club in platoons so that they can brag about an 81% win rate would say that MM is the best that it has ever been.  Why would you want it changed to not allow MM to be taken advantage of?

 

 

I had to log in just to give you an up!



_Tsavo_ #24 Posted Dec 16 2020 - 03:19

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 50101 battles
  • 21,833
  • Member since:
    02-16-2011

View Postdrgnrdr6, on Dec 15 2020 - 20:03, said:

I never said you failed to learn if you read what is said correctly you would see that i said you didn't 

pay attention.

 

And i was quite civil in my reply to you so why did you need to reply like the UNITURD YOU ARE.

OR JUST ANOTHER UNCIVILIZED IDIOT

 

AND BY THE WAY I AIN'T YOUR EFFN KID BOY!

 

Okay, kid.  You know what's arty safe?  Passive play.  Want to go after map control and wins?  Gotta go into the non arty safe spots.  

 

The only arty safe option is to not be spotted.  



spud_tuber #25 Posted Dec 16 2020 - 04:16

    Major

  • Players
  • 66542 battles
  • 11,016
  • Member since:
    08-26-2013

View Post_Tsavo_, on Dec 15 2020 - 20:19, said:

 

Okay, kid.  You know what's arty safe?  Passive play.  Want to go after map control and wins?  Gotta go into the non arty safe spots.  

 

The only arty safe option is to not be spotted.  

Which, honestly,  only delays the inevitable unless your team is more patient and better at vision.   

 

A fast push actually does more to reduce arty's effectiveness as a whole, but of course requires,  well, a push.  Not easy to do without better tools to coordinate with your team, though sometimes a 3 tank toon is enough. 

 

Rushing to strong defensive, but forward, places to sit and peek-a-boom with people gives arty relatively static targets that are near constantly lit.  I realize this is the current WoT meta, at least when arty isn't disrupting it.  Then again, this is the type of "camping" most likely meant on the original, infamous "arty prevents camping" statement.  

 

I guess that just goes to show how much WG suffers from right hand not knowing what the left is doing...



_Tsavo_ #26 Posted Dec 16 2020 - 04:29

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 50101 battles
  • 21,833
  • Member since:
    02-16-2011

View Postspud_tuber, on Dec 15 2020 - 22:16, said:

Which, honestly,  only delays the inevitable unless your team is more patient and better at vision.   

 

A fast push actually does more to reduce arty's effectiveness as a whole, but of course requires,  well, a push.  Not easy to do without better tools to coordinate with your team, though sometimes a 3 tank toon is enough. 

 

Rushing to strong defensive, but forward, places to sit and peek-a-boom with people gives arty relatively static targets that are near constantly lit.  I realize this is the current WoT meta, at least when arty isn't disrupting it.  Then again, this is the type of "camping" most likely meant on the original, infamous "arty prevents camping" statement.  

 

I guess that just goes to show how much WG suffers from right hand not knowing what the left is doing...

 

Yup,arty counters strong positions and discourages what's usually considered active, front line fighting here.  You can try to mitigate, but those spots are specifically not arty safe, and it irks me when peeps say, "lol, just be arty safe, bro", it's not designed that way



Trakks #27 Posted Dec 16 2020 - 06:51

    Major

  • Players
  • 5734 battles
  • 2,293
  • Member since:
    11-24-2011
I don't care about MM, but have to cast my vote against the new crew system. 

lnvalid_Target #28 Posted Dec 16 2020 - 07:12

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 11583 battles
  • 252
  • [CBRO] CBRO
  • Member since:
    06-23-2012
Leave our crews alone WG.

Kefic #29 Posted Dec 16 2020 - 14:03

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 17225 battles
  • 987
  • [ULFR] ULFR
  • Member since:
    03-20-2012

View Postdrgnrdr6, on Dec 15 2020 - 15:47, said:

I agree with the first part yes higher population is needed. But if you look at the rest of the changes coming it is not just

1 or 2 things it is a whole effn freight train of things. the HE changes and yeah right HE spam obviously they dont see the

premium ammo spam. The RAPE of arty again. So many changes due to all the cry babies against ARTY because they 

CANNOT figure out how to play ARTY safe. Got to cater to the cry babies. Hell I have been playing for 9 years and have

figured it out but that's due to playing arty. Also the crew changes why is it needed. crews are not broken there are other

things needed before the crew changes. Yes adapt but not at the cost of screwing over the player base. AW did same and 

lost a load of players. 

 

WG QUIT CATERING TO THE CRY BABIES AND TO THE BIG CLANS BECAUSE THE DON'T LIKE A CLASS OF VEHICLES

THAT OTHERS DO LIKE AND DO PLAY. WE WORKED FOR THOSE VEHICLES AND NOW YOU ARE GUTTING THEM AND 

WITH THE SEIGE MODE WE WON'T EVEN BE ABLE TO DEFEND OURSELVES.

Not to be an [edited], but looking at your stats...you haven't figured anything about this game out...to include playing Arty.



Kefic #30 Posted Dec 16 2020 - 14:08

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 17225 battles
  • 987
  • [ULFR] ULFR
  • Member since:
    03-20-2012

Arty does nothing but encourage camping.

 



Panzerjager72 #31 Posted Dec 16 2020 - 17:59

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 23661 battles
  • 680
  • [GLAD-] GLAD-
  • Member since:
    03-18-2016

Players: "We would like you to fix MM, wheelies and Arty"

 

WG: "We hear you! We have been working long tireless hours, days and years on new additions and changes.....so here is your new crew skin and 25% EXP booster that we have been working on".



LucasAnon #32 Posted Dec 16 2020 - 18:02

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 9342 battles
  • 502
  • [BABNS] BABNS
  • Member since:
    09-13-2014

View Post_Tsavo_, on Dec 15 2020 - 21:03, said:

There's is no such thing as arty safe. 

Yes, there is. Just dont press "Battle!" and you will be arta safe



Flakker2 #33 Posted Dec 16 2020 - 22:49

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 61798 battles
  • 2,579
  • [SIMP] SIMP
  • Member since:
    07-17-2010
MM can be tweaked and improved, instead of creating crew changes nobody asked for nor is needed by the game. For example, if your top 3 highest Tiers are 3 glass cannon TDs and they are matched against 3 heavily armored heavies, then that will have a significant impact on the battle if the MM chose tanks of more similar types.

Bronco272 #34 Posted Feb 13 2021 - 19:39

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 25026 battles
  • 41
  • [EMAIL] EMAIL
  • Member since:
    10-05-2014

View PostPanzerjager72, on Dec 16 2020 - 17:59, said:

Players: "We would like you to fix MM, wheelies and Arty"

 

WG: "We hear you! We have been working long tireless hours, days and years on new additions and changes.....so here is your new crew skin and 25% EXP booster that we have been working on".


Well, good news.  Wargaming has nerfed the wheeled vehicles (I would argue not enough, but it is a nerf in the right direction).  Wargaming is going to start testing artillery changes on the Sandbox test server in late February, early March 2021.

 

Granted, on the matchmaker, Wargaming has not really made significant changes recently, and it does not seem they will make changes in the near future.  And honestly, I cannot blame them at all.  I always hear people saying "matchmaker is rigged!", "fix the matchmaker!", "matchmaker sucks!".  Most people say the issues are related to blowouts, but maybe there are some other issues that I have not heard.  People don't usually say specific what is wrong with the matchmaker, much less how to fix the matchmaker.  When you all say "fix the matchmaker!", what exactly are you asking for?



killerman1997 #35 Posted Feb 13 2021 - 19:49

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 35424 battles
  • 228
  • [GURUS] GURUS
  • Member since:
    07-21-2012

I dont get why people are so rabid over crew 2.0

 

"Current Crews won’t be automatically converted into the new Crew 2.0. This will be a manual process done by the players by pressing a button “Convert Crew”."

-thedailybounce

 

im gonna be clicking that convert crew on every single crew i have. because its gonna be way better than what we have now....



umkhulu #36 Posted Feb 13 2021 - 20:09

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 124 battles
  • 2,342
  • Member since:
    07-15-2017

View Post_Tsavo_, on Dec 16 2020 - 01:37, said:

I fail to learn?  Kid, I've forgotten more about tanks than you'll ever learn 

 

You can be as patronizing as you like, but it seems that you have failed to learn that lesser stats does not mean lesser age!.... :)

 

 

 



Gtraxeman #37 Posted Feb 13 2021 - 20:20

    Captain

  • Players
  • 41867 battles
  • 1,491
  • [DHO6] DHO6
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013

View Postkillerman1997, on Feb 13 2021 - 19:49, said:

I dont get why people are so rabid over crew 2.0..........

Fear of the unknown. Also a lot of misinformation (from what Ive seen) about the very little information we have been given.

Im on the "wait and see" side of the issue. I am also looking forward to it perhaps being better.



Koala_In_The_Rain #38 Posted Feb 13 2021 - 20:22

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 32513 battles
  • 8,972
  • [TER] TER
  • Member since:
    02-28-2016

View PostGtraxeman, on Feb 13 2021 - 12:20, said:

Fear of the unknown. Also a lot of misinformation (from what Ive seen) about the very little information we have been given.

Im on the "wait and see" side of the issue. I am also looking forward to it perhaps being better.

 

So ... kinda new to WG, are we?  How are you liking your first week playing?  :sceptic:

 

:teethhappy::P



Gtraxeman #39 Posted Feb 13 2021 - 20:23

    Captain

  • Players
  • 41867 battles
  • 1,491
  • [DHO6] DHO6
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013

View PostKoala_In_The_Rain, on Feb 13 2021 - 20:22, said:

 

So ... kinda new to WG, are we?  How are you liking your first week playing?  :sceptic:

 

:teethhappy::P

????. Is this sarcasm? I think with my battle count and years played, Ive got an idea.



umkhulu #40 Posted Feb 13 2021 - 20:25

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 124 battles
  • 2,342
  • Member since:
    07-15-2017

If crew 2 is anything like the system implemented in World of Warships, I don't really have anything against it, but neither do i see any benefit!.Simply a change for change  sake and NOT an improvement!

 

And whose idea anyway?. Certainly doesn't seem to come from the player-base judging from the host of negative comments one reads on the forums!....

 

I wonder what the Russians have to say about it?

 






2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users