Jump to content


* * * * * 1 votes

[ S T ] 6 tanks are entering the super test.

KRZY

  • Please log in to reply
45 replies to this topic

KRZYBooP #1 Posted Apr 02 2021 - 17:04

    Community Coordinator

  • Administrator
  • 4887 battles
  • 1,371
  • [WGA] WGA
  • Member since:
    08-10-2015

Howdy Boom Jockeys, 

 

 

In addition to the previously mentioned changes to some Premium vehicles, we also aim to improve a number of reward vehicles. These are vehicles that players can receive for activities on the Global Map. The goal of the rebalance is to make them more relevant in the game.

Full list of planned changes:

M60

  • Complex improvement of the turret armoring

121B

  • Reload time will be changed from 8.7 to 8.1 s
  • Damage per minute will be changed from 2,689 to 2,909 HP
  • Top speed will be changed from 50 to 55 km/h
  • Reverse speed will be changed from 20 to 25 km/h
  • Armoring of the turret and upper glacis plate will be improved

KV-4 Kreslavskiy

  • Gun dispersion during movement and on hull traverse will be changed from 0.21 to 0.14 m
  • Engine power will be changed from 1,200 to 1,350 h.p.
  • Specific power will be changed from 12.96 to 14.6 h.p./t
  • Top speed will be changed from 30 to 40 km/h
  • Vehicle durability will be changed from 1,500 to 1,700 HP
  • Armoring of the turret front and the sides of the gun mantlet will be improved

Chieftain/T95

  • Gun dispersion during movement and on hull traverse will be changed from 0.18 to 0.14 m
  • Gun dispersion on turret traverse will be changed from 0.14 to 0.1 m
  • Reload time will be changed from 8.3 to 7.5 s
  • Damage per minute will be changed from 1,734 to 1,920 HP
  • View range will be changed from 380 to 400 m
  • Engine power will be changed from 750 to 850 h.p.
  • Specifics power will be changed from 15 to 17 h.p./t

IS-5

  • Gun dispersion during movement and on hull traverse will be changed from 0.24 to 0.2 m
  • Gun dispersion on turret traverse will be changed from 0.16 to 0.1 m
  • Gun depression angle will be changed from –5 to –7 deg.

T23E3

  • Gun dispersion during movement and on hull traverse will be changed from 0.2 to 0.14 m

Note that the above changes are not final and may be adjusted.

 



HejHejMonika #2 Posted Apr 02 2021 - 17:05

    Major

  • Players
  • 4041 battles
  • 2,621
  • [BOBA_] BOBA_
  • Member since:
    08-21-2020
Good to see that more outdated premiums are getting buffed.

cloudwalking #3 Posted Apr 02 2021 - 17:14

    Captain

  • Players
  • 198 battles
  • 1,087
  • Member since:
    08-29-2016

Some of these changes look really good.

 

My only real complaint that I see as of now...the chieftain.  IT'S CUPOLA IS THE ENTIRE PROBLEM WITH THE TANK...so it's hilarious to see nothing being done with it.  So it will still be pretty much garbage as long as the massive cupola on top is like it is now.  

 

 



_Tsavo_ #4 Posted Apr 02 2021 - 17:45

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 50201 battles
  • 21,995
  • [GPARD] GPARD
  • Member since:
    02-16-2011
M60: "Complex turret armor enhancement" = "Yo, guys, we're gonna leave the growth and uparmor the rest of the turret and call it strong!"

THE_SOCK_MONSTER #5 Posted Apr 02 2021 - 17:49

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 42955 battles
  • 98
  • [MOWR] MOWR
  • Member since:
    01-29-2011
Hopefully they give it the M60A3 turret... fingers crossed.

Spam_Goose #6 Posted Apr 02 2021 - 17:50

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 13664 battles
  • 86
  • Member since:
    07-26-2011
very good buffs, but I have some beef with the KV-4's. The gun needs some love than just dispersion on movement, needs better reload time and average damage (laughable 1,700 dpm). all are pretty bad for a 107 and for a rare to see on a heavy. More hull armor would be nice, but I'd like to atleast see some gun buffs added to it (just in reload would be fine as well)

yruputin #7 Posted Apr 02 2021 - 18:01

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 37057 battles
  • 889
  • [HOR] HOR
  • Member since:
    03-08-2016
LOL no AEphase 1 . Wargaming the numbers don't matter because you need to mess with the players. I bet you most chose the AE for BP reward so you'll bang on them:D

Spam_Goose #8 Posted Apr 02 2021 - 18:12

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 13664 battles
  • 86
  • Member since:
    07-26-2011

View Postyruputin, on Apr 02 2021 - 18:01, said:

LOL no AEphase 1 . Wargaming the numbers don't matter because you need to mess with the players. I bet you most chose the AE for BP reward so you'll bang on them:D

why would the AEPhase 1 be here? its perfectly fine where it is



Gothraul #9 Posted Apr 02 2021 - 18:18

    Major

  • Players
  • 3177 battles
  • 7,251
  • Member since:
    11-17-2014
This is a good start though there is room for more like dealing with the large tumors on the M60 and the Chieftain/T95 as well improving the armor a bit with the IS-5s hull. The KV-4 K can use a bit more armor for the hull front and a small bpm buff. The slight gun handling buff for the T23e3 is underwhelming as it can use a bit more. Overall this is great news for collectors and those sitting on heaps of bonds wanting something different to play on occasion.  

Spam_Goose #10 Posted Apr 02 2021 - 18:24

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 13664 battles
  • 86
  • Member since:
    07-26-2011

View PostGothraul, on Apr 02 2021 - 18:18, said:

This is a good start though there is room for more like dealing with the large tumors on the M60 and the Chieftain/T95 as well improving the armor a bit with the IS-5s hull. The KV-4 K can use a bit more armor for the hull front and a small bpm buff. The slight gun handling buff for the T23e3 is underwhelming as it can use a bit more. Overall this is great news for collectors and those sitting on heaps of bonds wanting something different to play on occasion.  

I agree, I mainly got the Kv-4 K because you never see them (and its pretty fun when people dont know how to pen you) but front hull definitely should have a small buff since it see 10's, where it is pretty bad



grego34 #11 Posted Apr 02 2021 - 18:44

    Captain

  • Beta Testers
  • 37024 battles
  • 1,797
  • Member since:
    10-26-2010
nothing for FV215 B?? 

BigJohnsonLogan #12 Posted Apr 02 2021 - 19:08

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 45915 battles
  • 370
  • [COLD1] COLD1
  • Member since:
    06-21-2013

View Postgrego34, on Apr 02 2021 - 12:44, said:

nothing for FV215 B?? 

The M60 has been out for how long and they just figured out it needs a buff. Maybe another 5 years for FV215 B to get a Buff, otherwise the T95/FV4201 owners would start crying their Reward tank was not overpowered enough ...



Spam_Goose #13 Posted Apr 02 2021 - 19:20

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 13664 battles
  • 86
  • Member since:
    07-26-2011

View Postgrego34, on Apr 02 2021 - 18:44, said:

nothing for FV215 B?? 

Might be in the next super test buffs, just be patient :)

 



Jaguarz #14 Posted Apr 02 2021 - 19:58

    Captain

  • Players
  • 9265 battles
  • 1,223
  • Member since:
    04-06-2012
M60 just needs lose the tumor, theres no justification for it after the M48 lost its, unless they up armour it to e3 levels.

Edited by Jaguarz, Apr 02 2021 - 20:01.


Avalon304 #15 Posted Apr 02 2021 - 20:51

    Major

  • Players
  • 26429 battles
  • 12,048
  • [Y0RHA] Y0RHA
  • Member since:
    09-04-2012

View PostJaguarz, on Apr 02 2021 - 11:58, said:

M60 just needs lose the tumor, theres no justification for it after the M48 lost its, unless they up armour it to e3 levels.

 The justification is the M48 actually did get a turret that looked like the one it currently has.

 

Taking the tumor off the M60 would make it not an M60. It would only look vaguely like an M60 at that point. Should they up armor it? Yes probably, but not to E3 levels, something similar to the E 5 or Renegade though would make it better. (Chieftain/T95 also needs the Renegade treatment too).



bake3020 #16 Posted Apr 02 2021 - 21:11

    Major

  • Players
  • 134 battles
  • 2,245
  • Member since:
    11-03-2011

View Post_Tsavo_, on Apr 02 2021 - 16:45, said:

M60: "Complex turret armor enhancement" = "Yo, guys, we're gonna leave the growth and uparmor the rest of the turret and call it strong!"


That's code for making the "TOOMAH" on top more resilient.



Sam_Sanister #17 Posted Apr 02 2021 - 22:47

    Captain

  • Players
  • 29777 battles
  • 1,934
  • Member since:
    10-11-2013

View PostHejHejMonika, on Apr 02 2021 - 10:05, said:

Good to see that more outdated premiums are getting buffed.

Now they just need to buff outdated tech tree tanks.



Spam_Goose #18 Posted Apr 02 2021 - 23:16

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 13664 battles
  • 86
  • Member since:
    07-26-2011
Its not a TOOMAH!

Spam_Goose #19 Posted Apr 02 2021 - 23:17

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 13664 battles
  • 86
  • Member since:
    07-26-2011

View PostSam_Sanister, on Apr 02 2021 - 22:47, said:

Now they just need to buff outdated tech tree tanks.

but that doesn't make them money :^)

 

 



Jaguarz #20 Posted Apr 02 2021 - 23:40

    Captain

  • Players
  • 9265 battles
  • 1,223
  • Member since:
    04-06-2012

View PostAvalon304, on Apr 02 2021 - 20:51, said:

 The justification is the M48 actually did get a turret that looked like the one it currently has.

 

Taking the tumor off the M60 would make it not an M60. It would only look vaguely like an M60 at that point. Should they up armor it? Yes probably, but not to E3 levels, something similar to the E 5 or Renegade though would make it better. (Chieftain/T95 also needs the Renegade treatment too).

 

The very, very vast majority of M48s came with a tumor, same as the M60 but variants of the M60 exist(ed) without said tumor, they changed the M48 to the M48a5 variant because the tumor was dumb as balls, they could easily renamed the M60 to one of the Israeli variants which binned the US tumor we have all come to despise.

 

M60 variant Magach 6r with additional dozer blade which is just a M60 with a uprated engine and no tumor.

 

Posted Image


Edited by Jaguarz, Apr 02 2021 - 23:55.






Also tagged with KRZY

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users