Jump to content


Posts are being deleted when comments are reserves are being used


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
17 replies to this topic

low_bidder #1 Posted Sep 22 2021 - 19:26

    Captain

  • Players
  • 35980 battles
  • 1,039
  • Member since:
    06-23-2015
I have noticed that some of my posts have been deleted relating to use of reserves. That being when three reserves are active the TWR rate goes significantly down.  Perhaps 20% or lower.

Edited by low_bidder, Sep 22 2021 - 19:29.


ArtyLove #2 Posted Sep 22 2021 - 19:37

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 1223 battles
  • 406
  • Member since:
    03-06-2018
Are you wearing the WG approved aluminum foil attire when making these conspiracy theory posts?

Cowcat137 #3 Posted Sep 22 2021 - 20:07

    Major

  • Players
  • 24071 battles
  • 10,815
  • [BOOPS] BOOPS
  • Member since:
    08-17-2015
We're just going to take your word for it?

nuclearguy931 #4 Posted Sep 22 2021 - 20:18

    Major

  • Players
  • 92835 battles
  • 12,683
  • [UMM] UMM
  • Member since:
    08-16-2011
They usually delete baseless posts/threads.

ArmorStorm #5 Posted Sep 22 2021 - 20:29

    Major

  • Players
  • 42543 battles
  • 10,224
  • [F__R] F__R
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
Really, you should be thanking WG for leaving ANY of your posts up. 

CAPTMUDDXX #6 Posted Sep 22 2021 - 20:47

    Captain

  • Players
  • 21392 battles
  • 1,888
  • [DAMN] DAMN
  • Member since:
    02-18-2012

View Postlow_bidder, on Sep 22 2021 - 13:26, said:

I have noticed that some of my posts have been deleted relating to use of reserves. That being when three reserves are active the TWR rate goes significantly down.  Perhaps 20% or lower.

Because your assertion is BS!



Kharah #7 Posted Sep 22 2021 - 20:57

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 19978 battles
  • 906
  • [ASTER] ASTER
  • Member since:
    04-06-2019

View Postlow_bidder, on Sep 22 2021 - 20:26, said:

I have noticed that some of my posts have been deleted relating to use of reserves. That being when three reserves are active the TWR rate goes significantly down.  Perhaps 20% or lower.

 

So then even if, and that's a big if, this assertion were true, you could quite easily fix this problem you have by just not using three reserves but just two?

 

Do you see how flawed this logic is?



Collapsed_Eigenfunction #8 Posted Sep 22 2021 - 21:02

    Major

  • Players
  • 29583 battles
  • 5,789
  • [CLAIM] CLAIM
  • Member since:
    12-06-2011
They’ve been taking down all the fun threads in general.

Projectile_Misfired #9 Posted Sep 22 2021 - 21:07

    Major

  • Players
  • 39469 battles
  • 6,407
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012

View Postlow_bidder, on Sep 22 2021 - 18:26, said:

I have noticed that some of my posts have been deleted relating to use of reserves. That being when three reserves are active the TWR rate goes significantly down.  Perhaps 20% or lower.

 

Now see. This is a theory that is actually testable (damn autocorrect keeps wanting to say testicle) and should be able to provide result in only a week.

 

So, to test your theory OP, at about the same time each day, create a "new" thread discussing your correlation of TWR to PRs. (Quick suggestion, once you make the first one, copy the post contents to your computer to make it easier to re-post it the next day...but maybe change the title slightly each day).

Do this for about a week (don't worry about replying to any of the post in the threads as they will be irrelevant to this test). At the end of that week, go back and see how many of your threads are still active.

 

 



Markd73 #10 Posted Sep 22 2021 - 21:16

    Major

  • Players
  • 36671 battles
  • 9,729
  • [2M8TA] 2M8TA
  • Member since:
    04-20-2011

View PostCollapsed_Eigenfunction, on Sep 22 2021 - 20:02, said:

They’ve been taking down all the fun threads in general.

 

IKR

 

I was disappointed when they took down the Maniac rage quit post. That had the making of a beauty.



__WarChild__ #11 Posted Sep 22 2021 - 21:54

    The Code Whisperer

  • Community Contributor
  • 47425 battles
  • 9,219
  • [OPIC] OPIC
  • Member since:
    06-03-2017

I think OP is right.  Wargaming deleted my Free M60 Codes post today for no apparent reason...except I guess they don't want people to get Free M60s or something...

 

:amazed:

 

 

__WarChild__



Shia_Halud #12 Posted Sep 22 2021 - 21:57

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 7953 battles
  • 533
  • [GOH] GOH
  • Member since:
    12-01-2019
Why complain about reserves when wot gave them to you for free? Perhaps wot doesn't want you to stack so many, limit yourself to use one at a time. Remember, "don't look a gift horse in the mouth"...stay well, be safe.

GeorgePreddy_lIl #13 Posted Sep 22 2021 - 22:05

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 270 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    09-08-2017

View Postlow_bidder, on Sep 22 2021 - 19:26, said:

I have noticed that some of my posts have been deleted relating to use of reserves. That being when three reserves are active the TWR rate goes significantly down.  Perhaps 20% or lower.

 

This kind of post makes me laugh out loud every time I read one.

 

Please... keep 'em coming !

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



heavymetal1967 #14 Posted Sep 23 2021 - 00:59

    Major

  • Players
  • 84020 battles
  • 30,089
  • [HSOLO] HSOLO
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012

View Postlow_bidder, on Sep 22 2021 - 14:26, said:

I have noticed that some of my posts have been deleted relating to use of reserves. That being when three reserves are active the TWR* rate goes significantly down up.  Perhaps 20% or lower higher.
 
*TWR = Tinfoil Wrap (by) Reynolds

 

Fixed that for you.



tod914 #15 Posted Sep 23 2021 - 01:21

    Major

  • Players
  • 73074 battles
  • 10,274
  • Member since:
    12-23-2013

View Postlow_bidder, on Sep 22 2021 - 13:26, said:

I have noticed that some of my posts have been deleted relating to use of reserves. That being when three reserves are active the TWR rate goes significantly down.  Perhaps 20% or lower.

 

Your prior posts regarding reserves weren't deleted.  They simply timed out.  Try one with a long duration next time.

 

Spoiler

 


Edited by tod914, Sep 23 2021 - 01:25.


stalkervision #16 Posted Sep 23 2021 - 01:31

    Major

  • Players
  • 89021 battles
  • 10,395
  • Member since:
    11-12-2013

View PostArtyLove, on Sep 22 2021 - 13:37, said:

Are you wearing the WG approved aluminum foil attire when making these conspiracy theory posts?

Aluminum foil doesn't work. It has to be lead. This man is giving false information.He obviously is controlled by the brain creatures ! : (



1stOregonVolCavalry #17 Posted Sep 23 2021 - 03:27

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 10515 battles
  • 141
  • [B-B-T] B-B-T
  • Member since:
    06-29-2020

View PostShia_Halud, on Sep 22 2021 - 21:57, said:

Why complain about reserves when wot gave them to you for free? Perhaps wot doesn't want you to stack so many, limit yourself to use one at a time. Remember, "don't look a gift horse in the mouth"...stay well, be safe.


Free? Where are these "free" reserves that you speak of? I'm all in for free ones. I usually have to either spend real money to get them as part of some special package or I have to earn them in missions. Per chance you mean "free" as in you can earn them in missions without spending any real money? First I miss out on the free M60 and now free reserves. Next the forum will tell me that logging into play WOT is free and I don't have to send some Nigerian prince named Ivan $10.00 every time I login to WOT.



Mojo_Blueman #18 Posted Sep 23 2021 - 03:40

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 61 battles
  • 192
  • Member since:
    08-23-2019

View PostShia_Halud, on Sep 22 2021 - 21:57, said:

Why complain about reserves when wot gave them to you for free? Perhaps wot doesn't want you to stack so many, limit yourself to use one at a time. Remember, "don't look a gift horse in the mouth"...stay well, be safe.

 

Nothing is "free". 






3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users