Jump to content


SKILL balanced MATCHMAKER


  • Please log in to reply
50 replies to this topic

Poll: skill based mm (50 members have cast votes)

who wants skill BALANCED mm

  1. yes (14 votes [28.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 28.00%

  2. no (36 votes [72.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 72.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote Hide poll

GeorgePreddy_lIl #41 Posted Oct 12 2021 - 21:15

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 270 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    09-08-2017

As everyone can see... at this moment there are 35 against SBMM, and only 13 for... do you believe in democracy or not ??

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



cavalry11 #42 Posted Oct 14 2021 - 14:40

    Captain

  • Players
  • 61395 battles
  • 1,666
  • [-NHL-] -NHL-
  • Member since:
    06-24-2013
What would it hurt for them to do it on a trial basis, then let us vote. WG would probably slant it the way they want it to turn out but it would be an interesting experiment.

GeorgePreddy_lIl #43 Posted Oct 14 2021 - 17:30

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 270 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    09-08-2017

The results of the vote are already in:

 

SBMM lost 36 to 14 against using SBMM for Random Battles.

 

Case closed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



extracheesey #44 Posted Oct 14 2021 - 18:05

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 228 battles
  • 114
  • Member since:
    06-26-2021

View Postcavalry11, on Oct 14 2021 - 14:40, said:

What would it hurt for them to do it on a trial basis, then let us vote. WG would probably slant it the way they want it to turn out but it would be an interesting experiment.

Off the top of my head, the costs of developing an entirely new MM system would be not be justified for a one off experiment. There seems no reason to incur that cost so some sad sack can feel better about a win rate for a week. 



GeorgePreddy_lIl #45 Posted Oct 15 2021 - 02:55

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 270 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    09-08-2017

Wargaming's thoughts on the subject:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



cavalry11 #46 Posted Oct 15 2021 - 20:51

    Captain

  • Players
  • 61395 battles
  • 1,666
  • [-NHL-] -NHL-
  • Member since:
    06-24-2013
Another words WG has no intention of fixing something a lot of people see as being messed up, typical WG attitude and its shills.

extracheesey #47 Posted Oct 15 2021 - 21:10

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 228 battles
  • 114
  • Member since:
    06-26-2021

View Postcavalry11, on Oct 15 2021 - 20:51, said:

Another words WG has no intention of fixing something a lot of people see as being messed up, typical WG attitude and its shills.

"a lot" doesn't mean 10 or 12 forum dwellers out of a population of 121 191* players this week. And, the last time WG listened to the players about MM, we got templates. Yay!

 

*source https://wot-news.com/stat/server/us/norm/en/



Markd73 #48 Posted Yesterday, 02:56 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 36671 battles
  • 9,729
  • [2M8TA] 2M8TA
  • Member since:
    04-20-2011

View Postcavalry11, on Oct 04 2021 - 14:07, said:

I still do not understand why WG and a lot of players do not want a skill based MM. WG has its own rating system just use that.

 

Look at it from the better player perspective. They put in the time and effort to "get good" and now others are asking for them to carry more bads as a reward with SBMM. 

 

No thanks. If you want better battles then put in the effort and get better yourself.



GeorgePreddy_lIl #49 Posted Yesterday, 05:01 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 270 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    09-08-2017

View Postcavalry11, on Oct 15 2021 - 20:51, said:

 Another    In other  words WG has no intention of fixing something a   lot of    few  people see as being messed up, typical WG attitude and its shills.

 

Fixed.

 

LOOK AT THE RESULTS OF THE POLL !!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



cavalry11 #50 Posted Today, 03:38 AM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 61395 battles
  • 1,666
  • [-NHL-] -NHL-
  • Member since:
    06-24-2013
Nothing but chicken[edited] people who do not even understand the topic, it would not hurt good players or help bad players it would just be fairer. I do not know about the rest of you but i am tired of always having the worst team and  lot of times a lot worse.

Ehrlichmann #51 Posted Today, 01:57 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 29025 battles
  • 551
  • [AFTTE] AFTTE
  • Member since:
    05-02-2011

It will never happen -

 

Bots, afk, double-reds, suiciders, bush-humpers, Apollo Mod cheaters, it will never happen.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users