Jump to content


Incoming! Concealment value correction!

KRZY

  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

KRZYBooP #1 Posted Oct 22 2021 - 19:49

    Community Coordinator

  • -Players-
  • 5102 battles
  • 1,490
  • [WGA] WGA
  • Member since:
    08-10-2015

Howdy Boom Jockies!

 

Just letting everyone know about a concealment value change.

 

More information on it can be found HERE.



Kharah #2 Posted Oct 22 2021 - 20:36

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 21185 battles
  • 972
  • [ASTER] ASTER
  • Member since:
    04-06-2019
Imagine if WG developers were this quick about fixing other mistakes in the game. That would be quite something.

redplayermagnet #3 Posted Oct 22 2021 - 21:00

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 40406 battles
  • 381
  • Member since:
    01-01-2015

View PostKharah, on Oct 22 2021 - 13:36, said:

Imagine if WG developers were this quick about fixing other mistakes in the game. That would be quite something.

hahahahahaha ya that would be something 



BianHong #4 Posted Oct 22 2021 - 21:22

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 6212 battles
  • 489
  • [KITTY] KITTY
  • Member since:
    01-07-2017

View PostKRZYBooP, on Oct 22 2021 - 10:49, said:

Howdy Boom Jockies!

 

Just letting everyone know about a concealment value change.

 

More information on it can be found HERE.

 

 

Those concealment values... that... is.. a... HEAVY TANK's CONCEALMENT VALUES!!! :facepalm:

 

WHY?!?! 114 SP2 is placed on the Tank Destroyer class but with a Heavy Tank class' concealment values?! WHY?!?!?

 



ironguardian #5 Posted Oct 22 2021 - 21:25

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 26092 battles
  • 221
  • [OPIC] OPIC
  • Member since:
    04-11-2013
Looks like a "nerf" personally...

HorribleForTheGame #6 Posted Oct 22 2021 - 22:42

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 1969 battles
  • 73
  • Member since:
    03-30-2021

View PostBianHong, on Oct 22 2021 - 21:22, said:

Those concealment values... that... is.. a... HEAVY TANK's CONCEALMENT VALUES!!! :facepalm:

 

WHY?!?! 114 SP2 is placed on the Tank Destroyer class but with a Heavy Tank class' concealment values?! WHY?!?!?

 

 

Tank Class has never been the sole measure of camo values.  But even when taking into consideration some balancing aspect of various attributes, these are a bit sus...

 

 

 



warrends #7 Posted Oct 22 2021 - 22:58

    Major

  • Players
  • 24265 battles
  • 3,060
  • Member since:
    05-19-2011
Thank you.

Brynar #8 Posted Oct 23 2021 - 00:50

    Captain

  • Players
  • 22466 battles
  • 1,270
  • Member since:
    09-02-2018
That doesn't strike me as even a noticeable difference. I wish WG would give the Senlac some love by giving it a camo rating in line with other tier 8 LTs. Probably a lost cause since it is now in the bond store, which essentially is the boneyard where obsolete Premium tanks go to die, with a couple of exceptions.

Avalon304 #9 Posted Oct 23 2021 - 12:30

    Major

  • Players
  • 27000 battles
  • 12,849
  • [SNPAI] SNPAI
  • Member since:
    09-04-2012

View PostHorribleForTheGame, on Oct 22 2021 - 14:42, said:

 

Tank Class has never been the sole measure of camo values.  But even when taking into consideration some balancing aspect of various attributes, these are a bit sus...

 

 

 

 

Vehicle size is the general guide for how stealthy a given tank will be. With gun caliber being the general guide for how much camo loss will occur after firing the gun.



Casual_Boops #10 Posted Oct 23 2021 - 17:21

    Major

  • Community Contributor
  • 42470 battles
  • 3,339
  • [BOOPS] BOOPS
  • Member since:
    05-14-2015
Camo sniping was never the way to play that tank anyway.... But it was a nice option to have. Shame that WG is removing that functionality..:facepalm:

HorribleForTheGame #11 Posted Oct 24 2021 - 00:45

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 1969 battles
  • 73
  • Member since:
    03-30-2021

View PostAvalon304, on Oct 23 2021 - 12:30, said:

 

Vehicle size is the general guide for how stealthy a given tank will be. With gun caliber being the general guide for how much camo loss will occur after firing the gun.

 

Explain the difference in the non firing camo of the JagdTiger vs the Grille 15 - or for that matter the 268v4 vs the Grille 15

Or why the WZ-113G has literally more than double the camo after firing than the Grille 15.

 

WG has always paid lip service to the reasoning behind what they set various hard and soft stats at, and instead pushed things in various directions at a whim, or for "balancing purposes". 

There's no reason to ignore obvious issues, even if you're a fanboy.

 

With respect to size, here's another fun one, with many of these having the same basic chassis/size.

 



bake3020 #12 Posted Oct 24 2021 - 02:07

    Major

  • Players
  • 134 battles
  • 3,096
  • [NOLOS] NOLOS
  • Member since:
    11-03-2011

View PostKharah, on Oct 22 2021 - 19:36, said:

Imagine if WG developers were this quick about fixing other mistakes in the game. That would be quite something.
 

We don't speak the appropriate language nor are we the majority of the player base either.  Sucks to be those that own that particular vehicle, if it's already been released. 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Avalon304 #13 Posted Oct 24 2021 - 07:54

    Major

  • Players
  • 27000 battles
  • 12,849
  • [SNPAI] SNPAI
  • Member since:
    09-04-2012

View PostHorribleForTheGame, on Oct 23 2021 - 16:45, said:

 

Explain the difference in the non firing camo of the JagdTiger vs the Grille 15 - or for that matter the 268v4 vs the Grille 15

Or why the WZ-113G has literally more than double the camo after firing than the Grille 15.

 

WG has always paid lip service to the reasoning behind what they set various hard and soft stats at, and instead pushed things in various directions at a whim, or for "balancing purposes". 

There's no reason to ignore obvious issues, even if you're a fanboy.

 

With respect to size, here's another fun one, with many of these having the same basic chassis/size.

 

 

Someone doesnt understand what "general guide" means.



HorribleForTheGame #14 Posted Oct 24 2021 - 14:19

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 1969 battles
  • 73
  • Member since:
    03-30-2021

View PostAvalon304, on Oct 24 2021 - 07:54, said:

 

Someone doesnt understand what "general guide" means.

 

Someone doesn't understand that his tireless white knighting of WG is beyond obvious.

 

Especially when I specifically stated in my original post here was about  "...sole measure of camo values..."

 

You couldn't restrain yourself from talking about generalities because someone dared to point out something many would deem to be long standing obvious issues.  In any case, generalities are meaningless when the exceptions to the general rule are so common.







Also tagged with KRZY

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users