Jump to content


* * - - - 3 votes

So, how you like one-sided wins and losses?


  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

JoeDaP #1 Posted Sep 12 2022 - 19:24

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 35040 battles
  • 37
  • Member since:
    11-30-2011

That's the question to the WoT masses.

 

Do you enjoy the one sided wins and losses?



fredbow #2 Posted Sep 12 2022 - 19:27

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7558 battles
  • 164
  • Member since:
    12-06-2013
No

1Nomad #3 Posted Sep 12 2022 - 19:38

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 25372 battles
  • 49
  • Member since:
    08-23-2013
 

View PostJoeDaP, on Sep 12 2022 - 18:24, said:

That's the question to the WoT masses.

 

Do you enjoy the one sided wins and losses?

 

It is better to have a game with rigging than no game at all, isn't it? One sided wins and losses are a side effect of rigging games and therefore can't be helped. Without rigging bad players would never win and keep spending money on this game, and the game would be out of business.

 


Edited by 1Nomad, Sep 12 2022 - 19:38.


_BobaFett #4 Posted Sep 12 2022 - 19:41

    Captain

  • Players
  • 334 battles
  • 1,963
  • [BOBA_] BOBA_
  • Member since:
    03-10-2018
Wrong mindset.

ATruk #5 Posted Sep 12 2022 - 20:25

    Major

  • Players
  • 86352 battles
  • 2,975
  • [OVERC] OVERC
  • Member since:
    03-16-2013
;Well yes, of course. Only one side can win. I know every body wants to win, but there will always have to be one side that loses too. Don't you see that?

PapioTitan #6 Posted Sep 12 2022 - 20:34

    Captain

  • Players
  • 54697 battles
  • 1,914
  • [YOON] YOON
  • Member since:
    12-21-2013
I enjoy striving to get the most out of all my battles; wins or losses. Not my problem if my teammates have other ideas.

CAPTMUDDXX #7 Posted Sep 12 2022 - 22:49

    Major

  • Players
  • 24852 battles
  • 2,786
  • [DAMN] DAMN
  • Member since:
    02-18-2012

View PostJoeDaP, on Sep 12 2022 - 13:24, said:

That's the question to the WoT masses.

 

Do you enjoy the one sided wins and losses?

 

View Postfredbow, on Sep 12 2022 - 13:27, said:

No

 

View Post1Nomad, on Sep 12 2022 - 13:38, said:

 

 

It is better to have a game with rigging than no game at all, isn't it? One sided wins and losses are a side effect of rigging games and therefore can't be helped. Without rigging bad players would never win and keep spending money on this game, and the game would be out of business.

 

Every battle result other than Draws are One Sided. One side wins period whether 15 to 0 / 0 to 15 anywhere between or Cap.

There is no Frgging rigging Grow Up and Get Over It!



Desert_Fox_1969 #8 Posted Sep 12 2022 - 23:04

    Major

  • Players
  • 52774 battles
  • 2,568
  • [RSRS] RSRS
  • Member since:
    12-22-2013

View PostCAPTMUDDXX, on Sep 12 2022 - 16:49, said:

 

 

Every battle result other than Draws are One Sided. One side wins period whether 15 to 0 / 0 to 15 anywhere between or Cap.

There is no Frgging rigging Grow Up and Get Over It!

You know that how? You programmed the MM? You work for Warfailing? The MM is trash and so is the playerbase. 

 



fredbow #9 Posted Sep 12 2022 - 23:27

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7558 battles
  • 164
  • Member since:
    12-06-2013

View PostJoeDaP, on Sep 12 2022 - 18:24, said:

That's the question to the WoT masses.

 

Do you enjoy the one sided wins and losses?

Did you mean lopsided wins and losses?? 



stalkervision #10 Posted Sep 13 2022 - 00:32

    Major

  • Players
  • 97750 battles
  • 10,540
  • Member since:
    11-12-2013
When ever have one sided wins and losses been a thing with this game I ask you ? :P

Edited by stalkervision, Sep 13 2022 - 00:33.


SplitSecond296 #11 Posted Sep 13 2022 - 00:43

    Sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 3443 battles
  • 102
  • [SHEEN] SHEEN
  • Member since:
    02-22-2022
its so much fun 

Ehrlichmann #12 Posted Sep 13 2022 - 01:03

    Captain

  • Players
  • 32548 battles
  • 1,449
  • [SCPZK] SCPZK
  • Member since:
    05-02-2011

The outcome is not rigged - IF so, show the causational relationship that creates the win/loss!?

Outcomes are decided by the decisions/lack of decisions made by the players in the match.

 

Its very very simple to predict the outcome:

1.  Add up:  Bots, afks, suicides, useless scouts, double-red incompetents, non-moving TD campers - per side.

2.  Add up:  Unicums and purples. - per side.

3.  Side with the most non-players from #1 will lose.

4.  Side with the most from #2 will win.

5.  That simple.



_Tsavo_ #13 Posted Sep 13 2022 - 01:04

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 52126 battles
  • 22,884
  • [GPARD] GPARD
  • Member since:
    02-16-2011

It's a game, from my perspective if I've lost to a landslide, I did something wrong.  If I've won against a landslide, they've done something wrong.

 

Do I like them?  About as much as any other match, it's a match and I'm on to the next one right after



JoeDaP #14 Posted Sep 20 2022 - 16:41

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 35040 battles
  • 37
  • Member since:
    11-30-2011

Excuse me for not clarifying.

I guess I should have said lop-sided wins or losses.

Does it feel more competitive if you win or lose by one, two or three difference?

How do you feel it's competitive if you win or lose by blow out?



R_V #15 Posted Sep 21 2022 - 21:13

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 64764 battles
  • 20
  • [F-3] F-3
  • Member since:
    03-10-2012

Not until the past patch have I seen so many 15-3 games. Out of 21 battles, 12 were that way.  Is it WG ? The stupidity of play ? Intentional throwing by the spin-off business of hired gaming to fake someones stats ?   It's probably a combo of all the above, but it clearly is out of hand. Can WG correct it ? Probably not. Should they want to ? Probably . However, historically, WG was the 1st to introduce 3rd part "cheats" by distributing warpack in what was purported to be a vanilla game. // Stats become corrupt each time WG nerfs tanks of longevity. Nerf a tank, new owners never get the opportunity to achieve the same as those before because the tank now under performs comparably. Bottom line , to refer to WOT as a game of skill and tactics is a marginal argument anymore. Its a full blown business model where little is done to correct the flaws but constant changing keeps a cash flow as gullible players chase imaginary goals in a pixelated world. Honestly went to sht when Serb walked away.  But, hey. It was once a grand game.

 



TankerJoe_1 #16 Posted Sep 22 2022 - 22:20

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 144 battles
  • 8
  • Member since:
    09-15-2022
Being a new player, I see quite a bit wrong with this game. Pretty much everything the above have listed. I used the 3 days of free premium and I can say that I do not see myself paying for anything in this game. Also, as a casual gamer, I will casually play this game intermittently.

Ehrlichmann #17 Posted Sep 23 2022 - 07:09

    Captain

  • Players
  • 32548 battles
  • 1,449
  • [SCPZK] SCPZK
  • Member since:
    05-02-2011

WoB will always have lopsided games until the issues regarding the players are addressed

in a meaningful way.

 

Bot, afk, suicides junkies, double-red hordes, red-line campers, rigging, cheating, etc

The more ^^^ happens the worse the game gets....is it really that hard to understand?

 



slayer6 #18 Posted Sep 23 2022 - 07:33

    Captain

  • Players
  • 16849 battles
  • 1,307
  • Member since:
    05-17-2011
I’d gladly be on the losing side 15-0 in 4 minutes than on a drawing side at 0:00 with 13:9 score…  Or a 13 minute win…




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users