Jump to content


* * * - - 4 votes

[ S T ] T32M enters the Super Test

KRZY

  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

KRZYBooP #1 Posted Sep 29 2022 - 22:32

    Community Coordinator

  • Administrator
  • 5570 battles
  • 1,688
  • Member since:
    08-10-2015

Howdy Boom Jockeys!

 

Spoiler

The vehicle is equipped with a 105 mm gun. It has a damage per shot of 320 HP, and a reload time of 11 seconds in the standard configuration. Penetration is 218 mm with a standard AP shell, and 252 mm with a special APCR shell. The aiming time is 1.7 s, and the gun accuracy is 0.33. These characteristics will make shooting extremely comfortable.

In terms of survivability and mobility, this is a classic American heavy tank with an extremely durable turret.



Avalon304 #2 Posted Sep 29 2022 - 22:44

    Major

  • Players
  • 29026 battles
  • 13,677
  • [SNPAI] SNPAI
  • Member since:
    09-04-2012
Yea... this one just seems lazy...

_BobaFett #3 Posted Sep 29 2022 - 23:14

    Major

  • Players
  • 342 battles
  • 2,198
  • [BOBA_] BOBA_
  • Member since:
    03-10-2018
Is this a new tank? The only difference I can see is the gun handling.

gpc_4 #4 Posted Sep 29 2022 - 23:50

    Major

  • Players
  • 53359 battles
  • 7,611
  • [DHO-X] DHO-X
  • Member since:
    07-06-2014
How about another Japanese tier 8 premium and not the tenth tier 8 premium American HT?

Avalon304 #5 Posted Sep 30 2022 - 00:56

    Major

  • Players
  • 29026 battles
  • 13,677
  • [SNPAI] SNPAI
  • Member since:
    09-04-2012

View Post_BobaFett, on Sep 29 2022 - 15:14, said:

Is this a new tank? The only difference I can see is the gun handling.

 

Just a premium version of the tech tree T32 with better gun handling but worse DPM. It doesnt look different at all from what I can see. The could have made it the T32E1 which has a better upper plate and at least looks a little different, but they went the lazy route here for some reason.



cloudwalking #6 Posted Sep 30 2022 - 01:28

    Major

  • Players
  • 198 battles
  • 2,912
  • Member since:
    08-29-2016

View PostAvalon304, on Sep 29 2022 - 22:44, said:

Yea... this one just seems lazy...

 

seems?

 

Thanks for answering questions in that event thread you posted, Krzy...



wifibandit #7 Posted Sep 30 2022 - 01:45

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 1333 battles
  • 411
  • [GFLC] GFLC
  • Member since:
    01-16-2014
I don't even know why you are showing this, back to the drawing board.

Engineer777 #8 Posted Sep 30 2022 - 02:18

    Captain

  • Players
  • 27630 battles
  • 1,536
  • [KEA] KEA
  • Member since:
    01-03-2013
Lazy

Kharah #9 Posted Sep 30 2022 - 03:06

    Captain

  • Players
  • 28427 battles
  • 1,396
  • [FINES] FINES
  • Member since:
    04-06-2019
Cringe.

ArcticTankHunter #10 Posted Sep 30 2022 - 03:46

    Captain

  • Players
  • 27096 battles
  • 1,139
  • [OSU-V] OSU-V
  • Member since:
    05-22-2014

View PostAvalon304, on Sep 30 2022 - 00:56, said:

 

Just a premium version of the tech tree T32 with better gun handling but worse DPM. It doesnt look different at all from what I can see. The could have made it the T32E1 which has a better upper plate and at least looks a little different, but they went the lazy route here for some reason.

Ya, people don't even do their research. I don't even know where the T32M came from.

 

They can add T32E1.

They can give T32E1 a 90mm gun that deals 240 or 280 damage with good pen. Just like Caernarvon 32pdr or T26E5.

APCBC M82 for 216mm

T44 HVAP for 302mm just for balance.

 

Current T32 gun is using M77 AP and HVAP M304.

 

View PostAvalon304, on Sep 29 2022 - 22:44, said:

Yea... this one just seems lazy...

 

Making Premium tanks unique is what sells, not copy and paste from tech tree and expect to sell. Yes, back to the drawing board for WG. I totally agree on this one. A higher pen 90mm gun that does 280 damage like T42. The E1 version is more ideal.

 

 


Edited by ArcticTankHunter, Oct 03 2022 - 02:36.


Avalon304 #11 Posted Sep 30 2022 - 06:12

    Major

  • Players
  • 29026 battles
  • 13,677
  • [SNPAI] SNPAI
  • Member since:
    09-04-2012

View Postcloudwalking, on Sep 29 2022 - 17:28, said:

 

seems?

 

For now? Yes, because things could change between this version and the version released.



ThaneTyrian #12 Posted Sep 30 2022 - 06:27

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 21674 battles
  • 988
  • [-T-O-] -T-O-
  • Member since:
    03-02-2012

View PostAvalon304, on Sep 29 2022 - 13:44, said:

Yea... this one just seems lazy...

Agreed!  Like the BLACK Cammos... REALLY?!



The_real_Charlotte_Wells #13 Posted Sep 30 2022 - 08:52

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 799 battles
  • 40
  • [3_NZ] 3_NZ
  • Member since:
    09-30-2011

T32E1 in reality and modelled.

 

(Credit to Wikipaedia and 'that other tank game that shall not be named';)

 

 



SpectreHD #14 Posted Sep 30 2022 - 09:31

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 17309 battles
  • 17,791
  • [TT] TT
  • Member since:
    07-12-2010

View PostThe_real_Charlotte_Wells, on Sep 30 2022 - 15:52, said:

T32E1 in reality and modelled.

Spoiler

 

 

Thanks for the historical picture although I do not think the other tank modeled it right. The glacis at the "beak" is not at such a sharp angle and the top of the upper glacis curves onto the top of the hull instead of a sharp angle.

 

But still, thanks for the photo of the T32E1. No idea where Wargaming got the "M" from. Probably the same place they got the M54 from.


Edited by SpectreHD, Sep 30 2022 - 09:33.


Avalon304 #15 Posted Sep 30 2022 - 09:47

    Major

  • Players
  • 29026 battles
  • 13,677
  • [SNPAI] SNPAI
  • Member since:
    09-04-2012

View PostThaneTyrian, on Sep 29 2022 - 22:27, said:

Agreed!  Like the BLACK Cammos... REALLY?!

 

Eh, for a specific event or offer I can understand it and am ok with it. But this isnt even that currently.



americankraut #16 Posted Sep 30 2022 - 09:47

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 35940 battles
  • 616
  • [AIMED] AIMED
  • Member since:
    02-19-2012
Instead of fixing the power creeped researchable t32, you can but the effective one for 60$......

Avalon304 #17 Posted Sep 30 2022 - 09:48

    Major

  • Players
  • 29026 battles
  • 13,677
  • [SNPAI] SNPAI
  • Member since:
    09-04-2012

View Postamericankraut, on Sep 30 2022 - 01:47, said:

Instead of fixing the power creeped researchable t32, you can but the effective one for 60$......

 

The T32 was just recently buffed and is pretty ok right now.



wifibandit #18 Posted Sep 30 2022 - 13:37

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 1333 battles
  • 411
  • [GFLC] GFLC
  • Member since:
    01-16-2014

View Postamericankraut, on Sep 30 2022 - 00:47, said:

Instead of fixing the power creeped researchable t32, you can but the effective one for 60$......

They just buffed it, more playable now.



IndygoEEI #19 Posted Sep 30 2022 - 20:08

    Major

  • Players
  • 79274 battles
  • 7,994
  • [_WOO_] _WOO_
  • Member since:
    01-06-2012

Lazy.  I may want a prem t32, but this ain't it.  I like this approach though...

 

View PostArcticTankHunter, on Sep 29 2022 - 21:46, said:

Ya, people don't even do their research. I don't even know where the T32M came from.

 

They can add T32E1.

They can give T32E1 a 90mm gun that deals 280 damage with good pen.

APCBC M82 for 216mm

T44 HVAP for 302mm just for balance.

 

Current T32 gun is using M77 AP and HVAP M304.

 

 

Making Premium tanks unique is what sells, not copy and paste from tech tree and expect to sell. Yes, back to the drawing board for WG. I totally agree on this one. A higher pen 90mm gun that does 280 damage like T42. The E1 version is more ideal.

 

 

 



martingalindo #20 Posted Oct 01 2022 - 00:08

    Captain

  • Players
  • 56516 battles
  • 1,207
  • [CRDWN] CRDWN
  • Member since:
    03-24-2011
Mmmm okey, not OP good tank, better accuracy than line version.
 





Also tagged with KRZY

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users