Jump to content


In-Game Vehicles FAQ


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
265 replies to this topic

sar1945 #241 Posted Jul 22 2012 - 23:45

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 18824 battles
  • 14
  • [NATAC] NATAC
  • Member since:
    08-09-2011
***

cannot  start  a  new  topic ???


so  why  call  this  thread you  ask  we  reply??


why?

Ryan_66 #242 Posted Jul 23 2012 - 07:25

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 20481 battles
  • 61
  • Member since:
    03-18-2012
I  am wondering if anything will be done about the PzKpfw II , and its lack of a decent gun ( I know prototypes where built with a 37mm and a 5cm ) they where not put into production because the tank by this time was dated ( but you do have tanks that where just prototypes and blueprints) . Seriously its way under gunned

53mils #243 Posted Jul 23 2012 - 12:28

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 48318 battles
  • 62
  • Member since:
    05-06-2012
I know I posted this in an older FAQ section but never got a response so here goes again with hopes of getting a response and improving the game.
I'd like to thank the developers for making this game. I positively love it!
I do have a problem I noticed in the new 7.4 patch/update. The gun ranging seems to have been changed somehow. No matter what I've tried I cannot get a shot from a 105mm howitzer on an M7 Priest to go beyond 400m. come on now, really? Rifles can shoot farther then that, Should be able to get artillery rounds to go much farther after all when you think about it that is not much farther then 3 football fields.. I have to get so close to enemies now I'd be better off with a Tank Destroyer instead. It makes the SPG a sitting duck.
Also, having problem with Chaffee. It is a deficit tank no matter how much time in battle, survive or not , win or lose, it always is a losing credits machine. Much like a one arm bandit slot machine. Fully dressed going into a batlle if destroyed you can expect a 9K credit repair plus ammo resupply fees. Much of the time you end up with over 5K loss in credits, win or lose with survival.
Can you please readjust this soon. Like in the 7.5 release? Thank you

Valas1 #244 Posted Jul 24 2012 - 08:43

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 9817 battles
  • 193
  • Member since:
    06-12-2012
Will we ever see PZ IV H/J variants, with the side skirts and additional armor panels added to the turret? Either as upgrades/options for the current one, or a new tank altogether.

DoommasterAM #245 Posted Jul 25 2012 - 20:17

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 12143 battles
  • 34
  • Member since:
    05-31-2011
Will the developers ever bring in the Grizzly Medium Tank as a Canadian tank? and if that, will they transfer the Ram-2 over to be a Canadian tank as well?

Edited by DoommasterAM, Jul 25 2012 - 20:22.


DoommasterAM #246 Posted Jul 25 2012 - 21:48

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 12143 battles
  • 34
  • Member since:
    05-31-2011

View PostValas1, on Jul 24 2012 - 08:43, said:

Will we ever see PZ IV H/J variants, with the side skirts and additional armor panels added to the turret? Either as upgrades/options for the current one, or a new tank altogether.
dude... they had the hydraulic turret model as a beta premium tank... look in the takopedia, heres a link http://worldoftanks....any/pziv_hydro/

Shred3590 #247 Posted Jul 26 2012 - 15:31

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 32939 battles
  • 12
  • Member since:
    01-05-2012
I have noticed that the JagdTiger 8.8 cm suffers engine damage on almost every shot from the front.  It appears that the engine is in the back and the frequency of damage to the engine is disproportionate to the other tanks I have played, including the tanks with engines in the front.  Is this something that is going to be looked at?

KnightFandragon #248 Posted Jul 26 2012 - 17:19

    Major

  • Players
  • 4617 battles
  • 6,732
  • Member since:
    05-06-2011

View PostShred3590, on Jul 26 2012 - 15:31, said:

I have noticed that the JagdTiger 8.8 cm suffers engine damage on almost every shot from the front.  It appears that the engine is in the back and the frequency of damage to the engine is disproportionate to the other tanks I have played, including the tanks with engines in the front.  Is this something that is going to be looked at?

Nope, WORKING AS INTENDED....there is this notion that German engines broke every 15 seconds, so in game this is represented by absurdly easy to hurt German engines....I have seen more German engine fires then all other nations combined in my 4000 some games played lol....mainly Vk3601s, Panthers, Tigers and Lowes.

War_Byrdy #249 Posted Jul 28 2012 - 01:56

    Private

  • Players
  • 6740 battles
  • 7
  • Member since:
    04-13-2012
Are you going to fix the aiming for the SPG's? I use USA SPG's (Priest and M41). Last night I was on target every time I played (winning ACE Tanker). Today, I can't hit anything. This is not the first time this has happened. I wait for the aiming circle to finish, I am loaded, and BOOM! Miss by 30m? WTH? I'm not on a slope, and neither is the tank I'm firing at. I get really frustrated with the inconsistency of the aiming for SPG. It's not a huge advantage to be SPG, when you take into consideration how long it takes to load, and I usually get killed with 1 shot by an enemy tank. The aiming needs to be fixed please. Otherwise, it's useless having arty support (which many teams/tanks rely on).

nikko211 #250 Posted Aug 01 2012 - 17:24

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 1098 battles
  • 539
  • Member since:
    12-18-2011
I was wondering, what type of TD is Dicker Max? The only TD named "Max" were Stuer Emil class TD prototypes of 1945. The only two prototypes were named "Max & Moritz". Will this lead to something? Note: "Dicke Max" (big max) may have been the nickname for max.

KINGER911 #251 Posted Aug 01 2012 - 18:08

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 1095 battles
  • 16
  • Member since:
    12-03-2011
CAN YOU GUYS ALLOW THE PLAYERS TO USE THE "EXTRA" WEAPONS EQUIPPED ON THE TANKS, LIKE THE MACHINE GUNS?

KINGER911 #252 Posted Aug 01 2012 - 18:11

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 1095 battles
  • 16
  • Member since:
    12-03-2011
FOR THE M3 LEE MEDIUM TANK, WHY CAN'T PLAYERS (OR TANKERS) USE THE TURRENT ON THE TANK?

xXx_UNHOLY_xXx #253 Posted Aug 01 2012 - 21:38

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 59261 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    12-12-2011
can someone tell me if the second turret for the m10 is better or not cause it takes a Heap of grinding to get and the specs for armor are the same. its slower on turning speed and weighs an incredible amount more... is its sleeker look actually so low-profile that it makes it worth it or what.

it just don't make sense.

anyone?

BigBoy300 #254 Posted Aug 02 2012 - 19:38

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 1228 battles
  • 17
  • Member since:
    05-08-2012
will you add the t-35 heavy tank as a tier 6 - 8 tank? info here: http://www.militaryf...sp?armor_id=346

potatohead #255 Posted Aug 02 2012 - 22:04

    Private

  • Players
  • 9353 battles
  • 5
  • Member since:
    11-25-2011
Now that we have this new 7.5 upgrade, I guess I should sell all my heavies, their usless. I follwed the heavy tank trees. I can see by going Medium is the way to go. The best bang for your buck. lol

Does anybody think the same way or has a comment. (Potatoehead my in game name.)

This may sound cheezie but I spent over 500 dollars in this world of tanks. My two mean lines of heavies are Russian and manly German. All these tanks are somewhat related to WW11 The other countries bye the time you reach tier IX or X seem to be late 40's up to 60's.

Is there a reason for that. The country of Germany and Russia must have tanks developed in the late 40's up to the sixties. All I know is I got to start over again and develope the med. tank line. I guess I could just go Arty. LOL

Edited by potatohead, Aug 03 2012 - 15:28.


______Ricochet______ #256 Posted Aug 03 2012 - 05:19

    Captain

  • Players
  • 11947 battles
  • 1,553
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011
fix the e100

potatohead #257 Posted Aug 03 2012 - 06:16

    Private

  • Players
  • 9353 battles
  • 5
  • Member since:
    11-25-2011
Bye doing what to it. It's slow and no turret or treverse speed.

Vonholtz #258 Posted Aug 03 2012 - 08:36

    Major

  • Players
  • 16328 battles
  • 4,304
  • Member since:
    09-25-2011
Why did you change the T-127 MM seting? The T-127 used to only get matchs in tier 3 and 4 now I am geting all tier 5 match it gun can not hurt tier 5 tanks much at all. So was the T-127 changed to get tier 3 to 5 or was this a oversight in the 7.5 patch?

NickNightmare #259 Posted Aug 03 2012 - 13:35

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 27663 battles
  • 171
  • Member since:
    01-30-2012
Will the Pz b2 and that other captured french tank ever be available for purchase again?

PantherAce7 #260 Posted Aug 03 2012 - 22:33

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 12986 battles
  • 28
  • Member since:
    12-03-2011
Already researched 88 kwk l70 but not 88 pak l70 shouldn't i unlock both because they are THE SAME GUN but with a different name depending on if it is on a tank or a tank destroyer (there are much more examples of this too on german tree). Will you fix this or not? Personally i don't like researching things twice.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users