Jump to content


Combat Efficiency


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
167 replies to this topic

Chris774 #1 Posted Jan 24 2012 - 04:06

    Sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 8856 battles
  • 181
  • Member since:
    09-12-2010
Not sure where to post this but needed to share it. This is a combat efficiency calculator. All you have to do is input player name, click load data, then calculate efficiency. Basically tells you if you are a good player or not and you can look up other players ratings as well.

http://wot-news.com/...p/stat/calc/en/

My rating is 1216.29

UPD: Now at 1244.47

Synthetic_ #2 Posted Jan 24 2012 - 04:10

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 6272 battles
  • 358
  • [PIKE] PIKE
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011
I got mine apparently Im a good player. lol :Smile_Default:

Efficiency rating
1345.26

Updated: 1435.13 Ive made some progress.

Edited by nick9645, Aug 07 2012 - 20:56.


Mewn #3 Posted Jan 24 2012 - 04:11

    Captain

  • Players
  • 15970 battles
  • 1,344
  • Member since:
    08-25-2011
Woohoo! I'm Average!

Bill McNeal - "It's one thing, of course, to know you're adequate, but, to have a  fellow member of the press stand up and say 'Yes, you sir are adequate,'  Let me tell you it is a very special feeling."

UnknownPpl #4 Posted Jan 24 2012 - 04:12

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 6424 battles
  • 320
  • Member since:
    04-20-2011
If I keep play low tier tanks, my damage per battle sure low... Then I'm not a good player~ XD

Marie_Korbel #5 Posted Jan 24 2012 - 04:13

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 5577 battles
  • 21,938
  • Member since:
    10-03-2010
1648.66


Darn wanted better.

DingBat #6 Posted Jan 24 2012 - 04:13

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 19978 battles
  • 3,684
  • Member since:
    09-09-2010
Any idea where and how they get the data? I wouldn't mind writing a small program to do this.

And, I'm not sure how accurate this is, based on the number I got for myself. Smells a little fishy.

Shinkyo #7 Posted Jan 24 2012 - 04:16

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 27974 battles
  • 234
  • Member since:
    05-22-2011
thks for share.. mine is only 1283.72.  :Smile-izmena:

ShiningArmor101 #8 Posted Jan 24 2012 - 04:18

    Major

  • Players
  • 42798 battles
  • 4,337
  • [FINES] FINES
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011
As mentioned earlier, the efficiency rating is a qualitative characteristic which determines the efficiency of the player in combat. But not all fully understand the significance of these numbers

Table of efficiency rating values
less than 600 Bad players (~ 6%)
600 - 900 Players below average (-25%)
900-1200 Average players (~ 43%)
1200-1500 Good players (~ 22%)
1500-1800 Great players (~ 3%)
1800 more Unicums (~ 0,5%)
In brackets approximate percentage of players with this rating

Player name: MrSuicide

Average destroyed in the battle: 0.77176398841287
Average damage in the battle: 649.92971489556
Average spotted in the battle: 1.2677237383748
Average defense points in the battle: 0.39076078670529
Average captured points in the battle: 1.9159932916603
Average tank lvl: 5.64



Dam. I think I suck. o.O

Vashts #9 Posted Jan 24 2012 - 04:20

    Captain

  • Players
  • 6335 battles
  • 1,267
  • Member since:
    12-15-2011
1130.

average. sounds about right

UnknownChemistry #10 Posted Jan 24 2012 - 04:21

    Major

  • Veteran Testers
  • 20500 battles
  • 4,291
  • [F0XEY] F0XEY
  • Member since:
    03-14-2011
Efficiency rating: 1392.2


Looks like I'm only a "good" player. Was really hoping to be a "great" player. Looks like I've got a new goal now. :)

DingBat #11 Posted Jan 24 2012 - 04:22

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 19978 battles
  • 3,684
  • Member since:
    09-09-2010

View PostMrSuicide, on Jan 24 2012 - 04:18, said:

As mentioned earlier, the efficiency rating is a qualitative characteristic which determines the efficiency of the player in combat. But not all fully understand the significance of these numbers

Dam. I think I suck. o.O

There's a little button to calculate your efficiency after you've loaded yer stats. Yours is: 1085. Nothing to be ashamed of.

dwaindwarf #12 Posted Jan 24 2012 - 04:23

    Major

  • Players
  • 31639 battles
  • 2,250
  • Member since:
    06-18-2011
Its good to be Average

:Smile-playing:

Symder #13 Posted Jan 24 2012 - 04:32

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 9450 battles
  • 226
  • [F0XEY] F0XEY
  • Member since:
    03-25-2011
1627.17

noll11 #14 Posted Jan 24 2012 - 04:34

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 9118 battles
  • 759
  • Member since:
    04-23-2011
Efficiency rating
986.51

Ah well my account got wiped by WG recently. At least I'm average :D


WallCandy #15 Posted Jan 24 2012 - 04:35

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 6507 battles
  • 301
  • [BT] BT
  • Member since:
    03-04-2011
...

TEForest - 1107.25

ArmsDealer - 1271.2

Logicweasel - 1169.9

Lozarus - 1628.21

Barroom - 1637.06

WallCandy - 1670.02

Better at tanks, and better looking? I like this little script.

noll11 #16 Posted Jan 24 2012 - 04:36

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 9118 battles
  • 759
  • Member since:
    04-23-2011
Hmmm....anyone know why the top slot is "Unicums"?:blink:

8112204 #17 Posted Jan 24 2012 - 04:38

    Captain

  • Players
  • 17625 battles
  • 1,819
  • Member since:
    04-25-2011
Oooh, how fun!

You can manually type in some stats and see the efficiency too. Apparently your average capture and defence points combined makes more of a difference than your kill count per battle and almost as much as damage per battle. Think of the implications...

EDIT:

Hmm... I was wondering that too. What exactly is a "Unicum"?

Everlasting_Life #18 Posted Jan 24 2012 - 05:32

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 24170 battles
  • 295
  • Member since:
    12-03-2011
997.16

eh, average but always improving with better tanks :)

SamWhite #19 Posted Jan 24 2012 - 05:40

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 4566 battles
  • 48
  • Member since:
    12-31-2011
1486.42

Better than I thought it would be. Whew.


Ubershiet #20 Posted Jan 24 2012 - 05:57

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 3029 battles
  • 285
  • [KBT] KBT
  • Member since:
    10-02-2011
wow...894...I suck...thanks for sharing :S




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users