Jump to content


Combat Efficiency


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
167 replies to this topic

Greneral_Maow #41 Posted Jan 29 2012 - 05:41

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 7313 battles
  • 4,198
  • Member since:
    10-17-2010

View PostWallCandy, on Jan 24 2012 - 04:35, said:

...

TEForest - 1107.25

ArmsDealer - 1271.2

Logicweasel - 1169.9

Lozarus - 1628.21

Barroom - 1637.06

WallCandy - 1670.02

Better at tanks, and better looking? I like this little script.

_grenadier_ - 1769.8 awwwwwwwww yeaaa

Filthy #42 Posted Jan 31 2012 - 22:10

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 18063 battles
  • 124
  • Member since:
    04-22-2011
1887.05

destruya #43 Posted Jan 31 2012 - 23:44

    Captain

  • Beta Testers
  • 8412 battles
  • 1,727
  • [PANSY] PANSY
  • Member since:
    07-07-2010
Efficiency rating
1880.24

I am a proud (and often upset) Unicum.

UnMoveingTarget #44 Posted Feb 01 2012 - 03:21

    Sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 3072 battles
  • 169
  • Member since:
    07-29-2010
1458.8
  for me

Ulfnar #45 Posted Feb 02 2012 - 05:19

    Sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 5252 battles
  • 121
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010
I'd like to acctually see their data distribution based on these algorithms to see whether or not those brackets are factual or just arbitrary. but yea 2016.28 for me according to that thing.

leonidesalinas #46 Posted Feb 03 2012 - 03:24

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 6159 battles
  • 579
  • Member since:
    08-02-2010

View PostWallCandy, on Jan 24 2012 - 04:35, said:

...

TEForest - 1107.25

ArmsDealer - 1271.2

Logicweasel - 1169.9

Lozarus - 1628.21

Barroom - 1637.06

WallCandy - 1670.02

Better at tanks, and better looking? I like this little script.

1282.5. better then Gates and Weasel. whoo. :D

Dinbatu #47 Posted Feb 03 2012 - 12:33

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 4730 battles
  • 573
  • Member since:
    09-10-2010
Mine is 1787.74  :Smile-izmena:

__RNG #48 Posted Feb 03 2012 - 17:18

    First lieutenant

  • WGLNA Gold League Player
  • 43266 battles
  • 746
  • [RDDT] RDDT
  • Member since:
    07-21-2010
2099.09

No idea what it is, but apparently I'm a Unicum. <3

RNGesus_Giveth #49 Posted Feb 03 2012 - 20:46

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 21590 battles
  • 261
  • [F0XEY] F0XEY
  • Member since:
    08-02-2010
1543.72  :o

Not sure how this is calculated, exactly. I have a 51% win rate, but I'm apparently in the top 3%. I definitely think I'm better than at least 70% of the people I've seen in public battles (no offense), but hm.

Keifomofutu #50 Posted Feb 03 2012 - 22:16

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 9243 battles
  • 895
  • Member since:
    07-29-2010
1477.  Its pretty good but it could be great! :Smile-izmena:

TheArc #51 Posted Feb 04 2012 - 14:56

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 1483 battles
  • 94
  • Member since:
    05-31-2011

View PostSnoozer, on Jan 28 2012 - 09:21, said:

Your all horrible lol 1975.51
First, the conjunction for you are is "you're" not "your." The word "your" shows possession.

As in, my epeen is bigger than your epeen! 2065.76:P

As to Unicums, I have no idea. The only thing that even comes to mind is that he meant to write Unicorn, as in "a mythical creature."

FWIW, I think the thing overvalues cap/defend points.

AGK #52 Posted Feb 04 2012 - 23:14

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 57841 battles
  • 642
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011
1336, im a good player but not satisfied.. need to do better

Boom_Box #53 Posted Feb 05 2012 - 06:21

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 11752 battles
  • 905
  • [REL-V] REL-V
  • Member since:
    11-17-2010
1800.2, WTF is a Unicum?

120mm_he #54 Posted Feb 05 2012 - 06:39

    Major

  • Players
  • 16470 battles
  • 15,511
  • [PBS] PBS
  • Member since:
    02-17-2011

View PostBoom_Box, on Feb 05 2012 - 06:21, said:

1800.2, WTF is a Unicum?


Unicum is something that is 'unique' ala you being a good player in wot.

I blame your shameless hotchkiss spam. :Smile-hiding:

Boom_Box #55 Posted Feb 05 2012 - 07:06

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 11752 battles
  • 905
  • [REL-V] REL-V
  • Member since:
    11-17-2010

View Post120mm_he, on Feb 05 2012 - 06:39, said:

Unicum is something that is 'unique' ala you being a good player in wot.

I blame your shameless hotchkiss spam. :Smile-hiding:

Yeah avg tank level is 6.5. My little T-34, E8, and 735F have spammed a lot targets. The other two most played is T32 and Pershing.

_Lion #56 Posted Feb 05 2012 - 09:41

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 30299 battles
  • 4,008
  • [-G-] -G-
  • Member since:
    05-08-2011
1531.73

I can live with that for now....

vit12345 #57 Posted Feb 05 2012 - 10:53

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 10965 battles
  • 593
  • Member since:
    02-11-2011
1741.26


not Unicum yet lolhttp://forum.worldof...mile-tongue.gif

W4lt3r #58 Posted Feb 05 2012 - 11:38

    Captain

  • Beta Testers
  • 11283 battles
  • 1,222
  • [SSGS] SSGS
  • Member since:
    07-06-2010

View PostWallCandy, on Jan 24 2012 - 04:35, said:

...

TEForest - 1107.25

ArmsDealer - 1271.2

Logicweasel - 1169.9

Lozarus - 1628.21

Barroom - 1637.06

WallCandy - 1670.02

Better at tanks, and better looking? I like this little script.
2041.06
Damn... I'm the 0.5% (or maybe 0.1%?)

Also nice rating arc.. Even with those 460-odd games.
Though I guess it looks at the average tank level and then compares it to the average damage done per match. 350 average damage with tier 2.7 average tanks is fairly good actually.

Battleship_Indiana #59 Posted Feb 05 2012 - 13:32

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 1827 battles
  • 66
  • [EDWRD] EDWRD
  • Member since:
    05-02-2011
1026.08

Gochtune #60 Posted Feb 05 2012 - 13:32

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 18868 battles
  • 581
  • Member since:
    04-10-2011
1476.3

I'm a good player. I thought I'm somewhere around average... Oh well.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users