Tank Eye Candy Gallery
Ducman69
Feb 28 2012




(note the barbed wire on the sides)










































Hopefully some of these are new to you. Feel free to contribute more!
KnightFandragon
Feb 28 2012
T92? T95? In the same pic? Thats amusing. When did those tanks come out?
Also, whats with the barbed wire on the Tiger? THey were on the Russian front werent they? Tryin got keep those pesky Ruskies off their tanks eh?
Also, whats with the barbed wire on the Tiger? THey were on the Russian front werent they? Tryin got keep those pesky Ruskies off their tanks eh?
ledhed14
Feb 28 2012
The wire was for both camo and anti - sticky mine ..as well as n unintentional anti personel measure.
It was also sometime thought to help with heat rounds ..
It was also sometime thought to help with heat rounds ..
Ducman69
Feb 28 2012
KnightFandragon
Feb 28 2012
Ducman69, on Feb 28 2012 - 17:40, said:
FCM Char 2C Super-Heavy Tank

Weight 69 tons
Crew 12 - 13
Armor 13 - 45mm
Performance 17 k/mh
Armament 75mm, 4 x MG
Engine 2 - 180hp Gasoline
Length 10.27m (12m+ with tail mounted)
Height 4.01m
Width 2.95m

Weight 69 tons
Crew 12 - 13
Armor 13 - 45mm
Performance 17 k/mh
Armament 75mm, 4 x MG
Engine 2 - 180hp Gasoline
Length 10.27m (12m+ with tail mounted)
Height 4.01m
Width 2.95m
LOL, that is a very, very, very, pitiful 'super heavy' tank...13-45mm......could the french build a tank with any signifcant amount of armor? The BiS was not heavily armored...it just faced Panzer IIIs and IIs at the time, so it seemed like it was, same goes for the T34/76......
Ducman69
Feb 28 2012
By 1921 standards, it was one of the most heavily armored tanks of its day. The British MKVIII's (remember Indiana Jones) thickest armor plating was 16mm.
That French tank likely would have been very intimidating with its super thick front armor (relatively) and big ol' gun.
I just don't think they had developed the type of anti-tank guns necessary to penetrate thick armor reliably yet.
That French tank likely would have been very intimidating with its super thick front armor (relatively) and big ol' gun.
I just don't think they had developed the type of anti-tank guns necessary to penetrate thick armor reliably yet.
bdplaya
Feb 28 2012
The picture in the lee looks like the crew is fleeing and is about to explode.
Ducman69
Feb 28 2012
120mm_he
Feb 28 2012
Here are a few more.
http://static.ddmcdn...ank-classic.jpg
Funny how all the lee photos seem to have the crew bailing out of them. ;p
http://static.ddmcdn...ight-tank-2.jpg
http://static.ddmcdn...ttle-tank-3.jpg
http://static.ddmcdn...ttle-tank-1.jpg
http://static.ddmcdn...dium-tank-4.jpg
http://static.ddmcdn...ight-tank-6.jpg
http://static.ddmcdn...dium-tank-2.jpg
http://static.ddmcdn...v-panther-2.jpg
http://static.ddmcdn...ank-classic.jpg
Funny how all the lee photos seem to have the crew bailing out of them. ;p
http://static.ddmcdn...ight-tank-2.jpg
http://static.ddmcdn...ttle-tank-3.jpg
http://static.ddmcdn...ttle-tank-1.jpg
http://static.ddmcdn...dium-tank-4.jpg
http://static.ddmcdn...ight-tank-6.jpg
http://static.ddmcdn...dium-tank-2.jpg
http://static.ddmcdn...v-panther-2.jpg
Pongo
Feb 28 2012
Many of those are new to me, nicely done
Its like hollywood thought the M3 was an APC not a tank. Maybe thats where the Canadians got the idea for the kangaroo.
I wonder if the ausies resent Canadians taking the name kangaroo?
Its like hollywood thought the M3 was an APC not a tank. Maybe thats where the Canadians got the idea for the kangaroo.
I wonder if the ausies resent Canadians taking the name kangaroo?


